About Mark Silverberg Mark Silverberg is an attorney
with a Masters Degree in Political Science and International
Relations from the University of Manitoba, Canada. A former
member of the Canadian Justice Department and a past Director of
the Canadian Jewish Congress (Western Office) based in
Vancouver, he served as a Consultant to the Secretary General of
the Jewish Agency in Jerusalem during the first Palestinian
intifada. He is a member of Hadassah's National Academic
Advisory Board, a foreign policy analyst with the Ariel Center
for Policy Research (Israel) and the International Analyst
Network (U.S.), and has been interviewed on Israel National
Radio as an authority on American foreign policy in the Middle
East. His editorials and articles on Middle East affairs have
appeared in the Hebrew and English editions of the NATIV Journal
of the Ariel Center for Policy Research (Israel), American
Thinker, Israel Insider, the Conservative Voice, Israel Unity
Coalition, Midstream and Outpost magazines and Arutz Sheva
(Israel National News). He has lectured extensively on subjects
of counterterrorism, jihadism, homeland security issues and
intelligence matters and is a Featured Writer with the New Media
Journal
(Chicago) and a Contributing Editor for Family Security Matters.
He is the author of "The Quartermasters of Terror: Saudi Arabia
and the Global Islamic Jihad (Wyndham Hall Press, 2005).
Mark Silverberg
The Final Reckoning
November
27, 2008
On November
25th, TIME magazine reported that the Bush administration was in
the process of establishing relations with the Palestinian terrorist
group Hamas and has warned Israeli Prime Minister Olmert against
resorting to any military action against it or Iran before he leaves
office. If true, the US and Israel are on a collision course. Nations
not only have the right, but the obligation to defend their citizenry
and territory from attack. As such, it is only a matter of time before
Hamas and its Palestinian sympathizers are called to account for the
death and destruction wrought by thousands of missiles they have fired
into Israeli cities, towns and kibbutzim over the past three years.
Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar noted recently: "We do not recognize the
State of Israel or its right to control any of the land of Palestine.
Palestine is holy Islamic land. Our national problem is not related only
to the West Bank, Gaza, and al-Quds (Jerusalem)...but to Palestine, all
[the territory of] Palestine." By that he meant Israel proper or what he
terms "the Zionist entity." Unfortunately, Zahar is not alone in this
thinking. A recent poll of Palestinians on the West Bank and Gaza asked:
"Do you support or oppose suicide bombings against Israeli civilians?"
Fifty-six percent (56%) said they support it. This parallels the results
of an earlier survey conducted jointly by Public Opinion Research of
Israel and the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion. That survey found
that only 13% of Palestinians agreed with the statement that "Hamas was
a terrorist group"; 82% agreed that Hamas was a "freedom-fighting
organization"; and a mere 10% believed that bombings targeting Israeli
civilians in buses and restaurants could be classified as "acts of
terrorism."
These attitudes suggest
an enormous ethical and moral divide between Palestinian and Israeli
cultures. What the Bush administration fails to understand is that Hamas
didn't get elected by accident. It got elected because its very
rationale for existence reflects the prevailing attitude within
mainstream Palestinian society. For the Palestinians, terrorism is not a
weapon borne of desperation but a strategic choice. If Hamas and its
Palestinian supporters seek the annihilation of Israel, they had best
understand the ultimate consequences.
Military historian
Victor Davis Hanson of the Hoover Institute writes: "Real peace
and successful reconstruction are in direct proportion to the degree to
which an enemy has been vanquished - the aim being that an enemy will
come to understand that it cannot go on being what it has been." In
effect, only after eradicating the reasons for which wars are fought -
slavery, fascism, Nazism and Japanese militarism - can real peace and
re-construction follow. According to Hanson, an enemy is vanquished when
it is rendered incapable and unwilling to continue the conflict.
Only then can its terror apparatus be dismantled; its leadership
replaced, its capacity to wage further war be eliminated; its weapons
seized; its militias hunted down; its propaganda machine terminated; its
educational system reformed; its human and financial resources channeled
back into massive social and economic reconstruction, and its population
prepared for a new and better future. If his historical analyses of war,
victory and defeat are correct, neither Israel nor the US will be able
to accommodate or moderate an enemy whose entire rationale for existence
is its divinely-inspired mission to conquer Israel and compel its
citizens to submit to Islam.
Faced with a choice
between annihilation and survival, Israel will choose survival. War is
neither pleasant nor desirable, but in an environment where Palestinian
suicide bombers are trained from infancy to hate Jews and are revered as
"martyrs," where Palestinian children play soccer with the decapitated
head of a fallen Israeli soldier and have an orgy in the blood of their
Israeli victims, where Palestinian mothers celebrate the "martyrdom" of
their children, and where Palestinians are taught a culture of death in
their textbooks, schools and summer camps, in their mosques and
marketplaces, in their radio and television programs, in their video
games and on the Internet, total war becomes necessary to eradicate the
culture that breeds such pathologies. Churchill, Eisenhower and Patton
understood this. They understood that it would have been impossible to
dismantle the Hitler Youth, the Nazi SS, the death camps and the cult of
Aryan supremacy without the complete and total destruction of the Third
Reich. Only such destruction permitted the re-birth of a new Germany
from the ashes of World War II. The idea that a genocidal, messianic
regime like Hamas can be bribed or cajoled into denying its rationale
for existence is the height of folly and flies in the face of history.
Eventually, a point
will be reached when Israel will be forced to act with or without
America’s blessing. Just as the creation of free and democratic
societies in Germany and Japan after World War II necessitated a
comprehensive purge of their pre-war political, economic, military,
social and cultural infrastructures, including the re-education of their
entire populations and the rebuilding of their societies over many
years, so Palestinian society must undergo a profound upheaval followed
by an equally profound metamorphosis that will sweep away the concept of
"martyrdom" and religiously-inspired genocide and sow the seeds for a
new tomorrow. Like it or not, the "death cult" must be extirpated from
the Palestinian psyche. That will not be achieved by forcing the
Israelis to concede Palestinian statehood to terrorists, relinquishing
the Golan Heights to Syria, returning the Sheba ‘a Farms area to
Hezbollah-controlled Lebanon, dividing Jerusalem, rectifying Israel’s
borders, or settling on a refugee compensation formula – at least, not
in the first instance. Real peace will be achieved only after the
Palestinians have been brought to the realization that their dream of
conquering Israel is futile, and that whatever the future holds for
them, it will be far better than the hell of war they have brought upon
themselves.
The US administration and the Europeans are wrong in believing that
there is "no military solution" here. As Michael Ledeen of the
American Enterprise Institute points out: "Peace cannot be
accomplished simply because some visiting envoy, with or without an
advanced degree in negotiating from the Harvard Business School, sits
everyone down around a table so they can all reason together."
Eventually, Israel will be forced to re-occupy Gaza and possibly the
West Bank, and return to its pre-Oslo administration for the foreseeable
future. Prior to Oslo, Israel controlled the curriculum in Palestinian
schools and prevented hate-mongering clerics from preaching in the
mosques. Israeli military officers served as mayors in Palestinian
cities and the Israeli civil administration assumed control over water
and land rights as well as economic activity. An acceptable level of
prosperity, order and security was maintained - unlike today. A return
to pre-Oslo would also permit Palestinian society to be restructured and
rebuilt until such time as a new generation of moderate Palestinian
leaders can assume responsibility for the future of their nation.
In the end, the
Palestinians will eventually learn to reject violence not because it is
politically ineffective, but because it is morally wrong. To achieve
that level of understanding may take decades, but one thing is certain -
only a society freed from the demons of its past can succeed. The
scourge of "martyrdom" and the jihadist rationale that epitomizes
Hamas must be eradicated from Palestinian society. Anything short of
this merely prolongs Palestinian agony, delays Palestinian
reconciliation and re-construction, sows the seeds for continuing the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and renders a new Palestinian rebirth
impossible.