New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
About Thomas D. Segel
Thomas D. Segel, a career journalist and broadcaster, completed 26 years of service in the United States Marine Corps, with the majority of his assignments spent in joint service commands covering military events and action throughout Asia. His post military career was as Director of Information for the Marine Military Academy, followed by employment as a Texas state official. His position at the time of retirement was Director for the Division of Information, Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, Rio Grande State Center.
Past Articles
We Didn’t Elect You To Do This!
Education in America: A Study in Stupid
"Trust Me!”...The Most Abused Phrase in Washington
Hey America, Knock Off the Pity Party
Have We Become A Nation of Lemmings?
We’ve Heard It, But Do We Believe It...”Trust Me!”

Thomas D. Segel
We Didn’t Elect You To Do This!
August 1, 2009
 

Well, Mr. and Mrs. Congressional Member. You are now heading home for another month-long holiday at taxpayer expense. A few of you may even have enough backbone to face your constituents on the issue of this massive healthcare takeover. You might even answer some of the questions that are really bothering us out here in the flyover states.

 

Do you really think we sent you to Washington so you can have mandatory audits of employers who self-insure their workers? Do you think we placed you in office so politicians can ration our healthcare? Do you really believe a government committee should decide what healthcare treatments and benefits we receive?

 

As one of the Washington elite, do you really think you are qualified to name a Health Choices Commissioner who can rule on our care, and even deny us the right to appeal? And can you tell us just when we authorized you to provide free health care to every legal and illegal immigrant in the United States?

 

We don’t remember telling you we wanted every person in the United States to carry a National Identification Health card. We also don’t remember telling you we wanted the government to have access to all of our individual bank accounts and money transfers. While on that subject, when did we tell you that we wanted the government to subsidize the healthcare of organizations such as the United Auto Worker Retirees and ACORN with our tax dollars?

 

Perhaps you can explain to us why all private healthcare plans must conform to government rules and participate in a healthcare exchange. While explaining, please tell us why you will be paying ACORN and AmeriCorps to sign up people for the Government Healthcare Plan.

 

When did the government become so knowledgeable it could determine the wages of doctors, nurses and other providers? How are you improving care when your bill calls for every doctor, regardless of specialty, to receive the same pay? How does it improve services to have the government reduce medical and physician services for Medicaid? How did you arrive at the idea of the government deciding just who can rent or purchase a power-driven wheelchair?

 

While on the subject of patient care, when did the government become experienced enough in medical treatment to know what a preventable re-admission to a hospital is…and fine hospitals for such readmissions?

 

Oh, and by the way, we notice that doctors who treat those unauthorized hospital re-admissions will also be penalized by the government. Some of our better hospitals and clinics are owned and operated by doctors, but your bill pointedly prohibits such ownership. You have also decided to make it a Washington DC decision to even expand the number of hospital beds anywhere in the United States. Why?

 

Among the many wrong-headed provisions in this gigantic, pork laden bill we notice the government will now instruct us on advance care planning, living wills, durable powers of attorney, and other legal concerns, Oh yes, these consultations will also be mandatory. But, we see you have found a good cost saving measure by rationing mental health services.

 

When you get home, please tell us just how you arrived at having the government give us a list of end-of-life resources and mandating a program that orders what end-of-life treatment we will receive.

 

We all realize you will be unable to explain any of this, because you haven’t bothered to read the 1017 page bill that authorizes everything reported on in this commentary. But, maybe, just maybe, you can take the time to read up on these items. They, and many more just like them, can be found on the first 494 pages of this unbelievable document.
Social Bookmarking
               

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review