
Erik Rush
Jackson & Obama: Unfortunate Words?
July 15, 2008
I try to avoid
making commentary out of commentaries of news items. I also try to avoid
using the word “I” in my columns overmuch, but the reader shall see how
that worked out. This is actually a commentary on a commentary of a
commentary on a news item, if that makes any sense at all.
Last Friday evening I
had the honor of joining Mr. Hannity and Mr. Colmes on their Fox News
television program. They, along with the urchinesque Tamika Mallory
(Director of Al Sharpton’s National Action Network) and I, analyzed the
July 11 New York Post
column by the Post’s D.C. Bureau Chief, Charles Hurt.
In his column, Mr. Hurt
addressed civil rights activist the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s recent on-air
sotto voce claim that he wanted to castrate Democrat presidential
nominee Barack Obama. The comment, supposedly made during a time Jackson
did not know his lapel microphone was live, was subsequently “heard
around the world,” as it were. Jackson later apologized (equivocally,
some suggested) and his apology was ever-so-magnanimously accepted by
the candidate.
Hurt’s claim is that
Jackson knew his microphone was live and “somewhere, deep down, he
wanted the world – and Obama – to know how much he wants to ‘cut his
nuts out.’”
A daring statement;
hence the analysis in which I was invited to participate.
Neither Hannity nor
Colmes nor Ms. Mallory nor I actually believed that Jackson had done
this intentionally – but it did make for some lively speculation. The
core message this columnist tried to convey is that while it illustrated
the seething hatred Jackson probably does have for Obama, more
importantly, it illustrated the hypocrisy of both men and race politics
in America.
It was surprising to
see how many people were puzzled that Jackson would have animas toward
Obama. I would have been astounded if he did not. The perception of
Jackson as a person of prominence and power in the eyes of black
Americans is his very life. Suddenly, this was threatened by an upstart,
just-add-water sage who captured the Democrat presidential nomination
after a half-hour or so in the U.S. Senate. He is more articulate and
far easier on the eyes than Jackson, he usurps Jackson’s message, his
audience, and then has the nerve to remind him of the credibility he
lost (with the 2001 revelation of his love child with a Rainbow
Coalition staffer) by chastising black men who don’t raise their
children.
Far be it for me to
excuse anything Jesse Jackson says or does, but colloquialisms for
castration are quite often used figuratively in many sections of
our culture. Jackson might well have been speaking to “castrating” Obama
in the arena of politics or his general credibility.
“It's embarrassing when Europeans come over here, they all
speak English, they speak French, they speak German. And then we go over
to Europe and all we can say is ‘merci beaucoup.’”
– Sen. Barack
Obama
Well, of course they
do. European countries are geographically situated like our states. What
choice do they have?
That night I would have
far more relished discussing Sen. Obama’s admonition that Americans
learn Spanish as a second language. I found it a bit disconcerting that
the television news outlet that has broken every big Obama story wasn’t
on this one like white on rice. That issue alone – properly packaged,
which is what it seems to be all about these days – could easily cost
Obama the presidency. Last week at a campaign event in Georgia, Obama
not only made the above declaration, he also pooh-poohed the notion that
we have a problem with immigrants not learning English and scolded
Americans for their lack of multi-lingual skills.
“Instead of worrying about whether immigrants can learn
English -- they'll learn English -- you need to make sure your child can
speak Spanish.”
– Sen. Barack
Obama
Make sure my child can speak Spanish?
Forget the fact that we
have a radical element in America that is vigorously denying the
necessity for immigrants to English. Obama points to Europe. Let’s
examine that for a moment. Look at the shape Europe is in culturally;
ask yourself why we’re moving in that direction and who wants us to do
so. It sure isn’t conservatives. Europe opened the door for the wretched
refuse of Africa and Asia. Many were Muslims; now there is real concern
when radical Islamists take to European streets in numbers. The far Left
answer to incursion always seems to be accommodation: Let the scum
in. Cater to them. Short term sacrifice for long term...sacrifice.
Wait a minute...
The fact is that people
have been emigrating to the U.S. and emulating American culture for
decades because we are all that and a bag of damn chips. It’s far
Left invertebrates and puke-gutted Bolsheviks like Obama and his
puppet-masters who seek to convince us otherwise, and to compromise
America on every level possible. Obama’s assertions are treasonous
propaganda based on perverted, flawed logic. There is every reason for
émigrés to the U.S. to learn English. For the European, travel means
speaking another language. It is analogous to a New Yorker discovering
that folks in New Jersey speak a completely different tongue. Unless a
European plans to work in a hometown factory or vineyard for their
entire life, the only way to successfully interact with the people they
will meet is to learn other languages.
People in Europe and in
other parts of the world learn English for the same reason. For the last
hundred-plus years, America has set the standard in commerce, politics
science, and a host of other areas. In order to remain competitive,
people found they had to learn English. There is no reason Americans
should be made to feel guilty about this. Obama’s comparison of
Europeans to American tourists visiting a densely-populated, extremely
diverse continent is beyond disingenuous.
This is what we get,
however, when we rashly look to the political left. The Democrat Party
is no longer one we can use when we’re miffed at Republicans, like a
child playing one parent off of the other. Had Ronald Reagan not come
along and infused our citizens with confidence, our economy with
stability and our enemies with fear, Bill Clinton would have been voted
out in 1996.
Until Democrats either
take their party back from the far Left, or Americans realize that the
party has been compromised to the degree that it no longer even
approaches viability, our spirit, culture, economy and national security
will remain in the gravest danger.