Put a Shine on This...Madam Speaker
The Fifth Column Erik Rush, Featured Writer
April 8, 2008
 

Our inimical lich of a House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was at it again last week, subtly sabotaging our military’s efforts in Iraq, potentially demoralizing and compromising our troops in a transparent election year political ploy. On April 4, Pelosi admonished General David Petraeus not to “put a shine” on developments in Iraq when he and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker testify before Congress this week. Petraeus and Crocker's report will ostensibly illustrate Iraq's political and military progress since their last report to Congress in September.

 

“We have to know the real ground truths of what is happening there, not put a shine on events,” the Speaker said. She was referring to recent violence in Iraq’s southern city of Basra which took place after Iraq’s national forces targeted Shiite militiamen there in late March. Said militiamen are loyal to the porcine radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, whom most practical folks believe should have been assassinated at least two years ago. The incidents in Basra resulted in skirmishes of varying intensity in other Shiite areas and only abated after al-Sadr ordered his followers to stand down.

 

The Speaker’s comments were calculated to do two things: One, to neutralize any positive effect Petraeus’s report might have on Americans’ morale as regards the Iraq conflict, the surge in particular. The other was prophylaxis – to neutralize, ahead of time, the positive political effect Republicans enjoy whenever good news comes out of Iraq. The last was an effort on Pelosi’s part to remind Americans why so many of them are considering casting votes for dyed-in-the-wool socialist elites in the upcoming general election.

 

Indeed, on Sunday and Monday, the establishment press made more of the fact that Democrats in Congress were taking a critical stance of the Petraeus- Crocker hearings than the hearings themselves. How are things going in Iraq, by the way? It doesn’t matter; Petraeus is going to lie anyhow.

 

Despite the Iran-backed thorn in the side represented by al-Sadr, the surge has been effective relative to foreign terrorists in Iraq, who were the source of the greatest portion of mayhem prior to the surge. This is generally not good, given the establishment media and far Left Congress’s success in presenting the Iraq campaign as an abysmal failure of the highest order and focusing Americans on their opportunity to anoint a new Democrat savior in November.

 

It then behooves congressional Democrats, Pelosi in particular given her position, to carefully place these propagandistic land mines in every area that has potential to draw our attention from where they would have it. Iraq was folly, it is a quagmire, worse than Vietnam, and any Republican administration will only promise more of the same. Forget what the troops who have been there relate (should it escape the press’s truth-quashing filtration system) apropos the necessity of our efforts; they’re just stupid, brainwashed kids. Our overwhelming desire must be to get out at any cost, or there is no motivation whatsoever to vote for the Democrat nominee.

 

If one did not know better, one might think that Pelosi and the Democratic National Committee had a direct line to al-Sadr’s headquarters. Our national security? A secondary consideration. The troops and Iraqi citizens who might be maimed or die as a result of her words? Of whom do you speak? All that matters is the undead’s next feed, the next ill-gotten political gain, the next successful misdirection.

 

Not that Pelosi corners the market on such treachery. Let us not forget the past treason of Representative John Murtha, who has also stooped as low as being a contributor to the far Left blog The Huffington Post; lending credence and legitimacy to that abomination with his office speaks for itself. During a radio address on April 5, Senator Joe Biden (D-Del) persisted in the call for our withdrawal from Iraq with baseless claims that the surge has failed.

 

“Pelosi and [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid also called for a ‘change’ in strategy in Iraq...” – “Iraq War Policy Debate Returns to Capitol Hill with Petraeus, Crocker Hearings,” Fox News, Monday, April 07, 2008

 

My, doesn’t that sound familiar? “Change” without clarification thereupon. It’s duplicitous business as usual in Congress, but Americans have been so inundated by the press with Iraq as a lodestone, the carny-like antics of Democrat candidates and self-destructive acts of the Spears sisters that they’re numb to these machinations.

 

One could argue that it is the fault of congressional Republicans and the Bush administration that we have Pelosi, Reid and the Democrats in control of Congress at all – and they would be correct, but only in part. The fault also lies with Americans who have become accustomed to being spoon-fed media propaganda, those who have abandoned critical thinking, and those who eschew their civic duties by not voting at all.

 

All of this militates against the political process intended by the founders of this nation – which ought to be first on the list of “change” anyone addresses.

Erik Rush is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He is a New York-born columnist, author and speaker who lives in Colorado and writes columns of sociopolitical fare for The New Media Journal as well as dozens of nationally-distributed print and online news sources. He is also a Staff Writer and Acting Associate Editor and Publisher for the New Media Alliance, Inc., a national coalition of writers, journalists and grass-roots media outlets. Erik is the veteran of numerous radio appearances and is the author of several books; his latest, “Annexing Mexico: Solving the Border Problem Through Annexation and Assimilation”, has just been released by Level 4 Press.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The New Media Journal.us © 2010
A Division of BasicsProject.org