New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Recent Articles
Caught in the Cobweb
Chris Dodd & The Last Check
House Poor & The Liquidity Crunch
Killing the American Spirit
Restoring Economic Sanity
Sarah the Spoiler

About Tony Rubolotta
Tony Rubolotta works in the technology industry.

Click here to email Tony Rubolotta

Tony Rubolotta

House Poor & The Liquidity Crunch
October 2, 2008

A friend called several months ago to let me know a house was being auctioned in his neighborhood, which is right next to the apartment I live in now. He went on to say the house was identical to his and the minimum asking bid was well below market value. When I asked what it was, he said $430,000. I told him I didn’t have the 20% down payment for a mortgage. When he said I didn’t need a down payment, I thanked him for the information and let it drop.

 

Ten to 15 years ago, my friend’s house would have sold for about $175,000. Today he says he can get $500,000. I doubt that is the case in view of recent events, but that kind of appreciation struck me as "unnatural”. This same friend also claims he has no savings. My friend and I are in some respects in the same boat, we are both house poor, he because of his mortgage and me because I’m trying to accumulate the down payment. My problem is that housing prices were rising faster than I could save the money.

 

I’ve been looking to buy a new car for several years in a row now, but my priority was buying a house. The car would just have to wait. Actually, a number of other purchases I may have made are being postponed for the same reason. My wife and I are disciplined spenders and keep our credit card balances at zero. I would say we live well but certainly not beyond our means. Because of this, I am going to be punished by the government and forced to give money to people who showed no spending discipline. While they were enjoying a home essentially gifted to them by the government, I did without, by choice because it was the right thing to do.

 

The latest scare tactic being thrown out by Democrats and Republicans is that without the bailout plan, the economy will be ruined by a lack of "liquidity”. In other words, the credit and cash required to enable people to spend beyond their means won’t be available. The second mortgages used to buy autos and pay for college won’t be available because the artificially pumped up home equity won’t be there. Bankers and lenders forced to make high-risk loans to unqualified buyers won’t make loans at all to avoid charges of discrimination and subsequent prosecution. There is some truth to this, and housing prices falling to their real market value is going to hurt those who were foolish enough to believe they could get something for nothing. One way or another, the spending spree by people that never had the money to spend in the first place and should never have gotten credit in the second place is going to end.

 

Without a bailout plan the economy will adjust and heal itself, perhaps not fast enough for some people in time for their re-election, but it will happen. With a bailout plan, the real beneficiaries are the thieving politicians and their thieving CEO chums, several now sitting as advisor to Obamessiah. Here is how it works.

 

The Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac thieves stole millions of dollars and got away with it thanks to their political connections, like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Obamessiah. Those millions will be used to buy bundled mortgages at 20 cents on the dollar from bureaucrats appointed by their political friends and following the rules crafted by other political appointees. Those bundles will be too large for you or I to afford and the government will say it has to be done that way to keep administrative costs down. The profits will be reaped when a new flock of unqualified high-risk borrowers spend money they can’t pay back to buy those same mortgages at 60 cents on the dollar. A part of those profits will get back to the politicians as campaign contributions.

 

The bailout plan, by the way, has absolutely no provisions for repeal of the regulations that have led to this fiasco. The bailout plan is designed to maintain the illusion that government can rescue a troubled economy. Nothing else will change and the government mandated practices will still be there. The economic laws that grind away at this folly will not suspend themselves based on scare tactics. It’s a vicious cycle that must be broken.
Social Bookmarking

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review