New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
About Jack Puglis
Jack Puglis, a lifelong conservative, managed engineering development for most of his career and more recently has prepared and presented numerous training courses in leadership, management and organizational development. He has been a lifelong student of economics, finance, management science, leadership theory and politics. Jack Puglis holds a BS and MS in electrical engineering and an MBA.
Social Bookmarking
Bookmark and Share
Past Articles
John Hall’s Shame
The Nefarious Force Behind Cap & Trade
Obama’s Healthcare Experiment: A Leftist Fantasy...

Jack Puglis
John Hall’s Shame
October 2, 2010

Democrat Congressman John Hall’s (NY-19) campaign manager, somebody named Patrick McGarrity, must fail to understand the meaning of his own words.

 

McGarrity authored an email that described the mission of the Facebook ANTI-C.R.A.P.T.A.S.T.I.C. (Collectivist Redistributionist Anti-American Progressive Totalitarian Antagonistic Slanderous Treasonous Insidious Cretin) page as hate filled. [Strike 1]


Here’s the correct mission statement: "To undermine C.R.A.P.T.A.S.T.I.C.s and their dangerous agenda.” What McGarrity posted instead was in fact a description of C.R.A.P.T.A.S.T.I.C. behavior – radical leftist behavior. Could McGarrity deliberately and dishonestly have plugged the wrong words into his email? Message to McGarrity: the C.R.A.P.T.A.S.T.I.C. definition describes you and your candidate, John Hall’s political position. [Strike 2]

 

John Hall’s shame: by this attack, he is defending totalitarianism, socialism, tyranny and communism. There can be no other conclusion from his negative comments about the ANTI- C.R.A.P.T.A.S.T.I.C. (A-C) page, since it is clearly dedicated to moderate, common sense, constitutional conservatism. All of the A-C page's posts, links and notes support this position. [Strike 3. You’re out, McGarrity.]

 

McGarrity, who lives in an ethical desert, refers to the A-C group as "dangerous and extreme.” As with all radical leftists, he makes such vicious claims but fails to identify just what is dangerous or extreme. It is easy to write bitter words; it is hard to back them up. McGarrity's words are the true hate-filled rhetoric.

 

You may view the A-C page on Facebook and decide for yourself if you see any item that is "dangerous or extreme.” Hint: you will find nothing of the sort, but you will note a great deal of material showing how our radical liberal government is causing damage to the nation.

 

Extreme is an interesting pejorative. Apparently, based upon McGarrity’s words, his candidate, John Hall, subscribes to Barack Obama’s far-left radical progressive socialist agenda. Far left radicals are extreme, by definition. This is Marxism on display in a candidate’s heart for all to see.

 

By contrast, the A-C page, like the tea parties, dwells on the moderate right. McGarrity seems to fail to understand what the far right is. The moderate conservatives of the A-C page and the tea parties strongly reject the radical right just as they abhor the radical left.

 

The Republican Party has lost its way in recent years and has drifted to the left of center. The Democrat Party has not so drifted, but rather has driven itself to the extreme left. From the vantage points of both parties, moderate conservatives look very far away, politically.

 

They are applying the term extreme right with malice of intent, but both groups have moved so far off course that patriotic constitutional ideals also look very strange to them. Their mutual leftward shift, coupled with the high levels of corruption in both parties, marks them as unfit to govern.

 

Strong feelings expressed on the A-C Facebook page therefore do not constitute extremism or radicalism; violations of the United States constitution by the president and the congress—and possibly by John Hall in the future—do.

 

The far right in the United States bears several striking analogies to the far-left radical Marxists of the Obama administration and the present Democrat congress. The extremists on the left and the right both want to exceed the constitution’s authority: the far left through tyranny, the far right through the dissolution of government. Both would destroy the health and well-being of our nation. Both ideologies are unacceptable to the A-C page.

 

The A-C page, in lockstep with the tea parties, argues for adherence to the constitution, the same document that Barack Obama describes as an obstacle to his progress. The A-C page holds precious the ideals of fiscal responsibility, limited government, reduced restrictions of freedoms and respect for the natural rights of individuals as guaranteed by our constitution.

 

In order for John Hall to participate in the radical leftist conversion of the nation to Marxism, he must assist Obama in the destruction of our constitution, our government and our way of life. It appears that McGarrity is exposing the reality of John Hall’s ideals. His dangerous and extreme ideals.

 

McGarrity is telling you, then, that John Hall subscribes to far-left radical progressive values via tyrannical changes to the system. Is this who you want in congress?

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review