|
NewMediaJournal.us
www.NewMediaJournal.us
Return
to Article
Kindle Compatible
Dr.
Paul L. Williams, PhD
Americans Must Defend Constitutional Rights from
Foreign Attack
October 16, 2009
I am a United
States citizen on trial in Canada for exposing a situation at McMaster
University in Hamilton, Ontario that threatened the lives and welfare of
Canadians and Americans alike. My book "The Dunces of Doomsday,"
published in the U.S. by Cumberland House, revealed potential terrorist
threats from al-Qaeda affiliates at McMaster. The university is suing me
for libel, demanding $4 million in punitive and aggregated damages.
Unlike American libel laws where the plaintiff must prove that what said
about him is not true and it was said in malice, Canadian libel laws,
like the British, put the burden of proof on the defendant, not on the
plaintiff.
What I wrote and said about McMaster from my home in Pennsylvania falls
well within the standards of responsible journalism. Nevertheless, I
have been dragged into court in Toronto, Canada, to be tried under
Canadian law that lacks the U.S. Constitutional protection of free
speech.
This ordeal has damaged my professional career, depleted my life
savings, and placed me in financial jeopardy.
I am not alone.
Other writers have suffered a similar fate, including Joe Sharkey, a New
Jersey-based freelance business journalist is being sued for reporting
about a plane crash he survived over the Amazon. A woman who claims
Sharkey offended the "dignity” of Brazil by criticizing its air-traffic
control is suing him for libel in Brazil. This despite the U.S. National
Transportation Safety Board’s conclusion that the Brazilian air traffic
control was responsible to the crash. She demands $500,000 and apologies
in national and international media outlets.
Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, whose criticism of a Khalid bin Mahfouz, a Saudi
billionaire who funded al Qaeda, has resulted in a judgment by default
in British court against her for allegedly defaming the Saudi. She was
ordered to pay $250,000, apologize in international media outlets and
destroy her book: Funding Evil; How Terrorism Is Financed – and How to
Stop It.
The same ordeal can befall all investigative reporters in the U.S.
unless federal legislators pass The Free Speech Protection Act 2009,
which is now before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Last week my pretrial took place in Toronto. It was not a pleasant
experience. My Canadian lawyers and the appointed mediator spent seven
hours attempting to coerce me into signing an apology to McMaster
University for stating the truth. They maintained that none of my
statements were factual according to Canadian libel laws.
I pointed to the fact that McMaster was home to several al-Qaeda members
who plotted to blow up Canada’s Parliament and behead its prime
minister. In fact, a week before my pretrial took place, the guilty plea
of a McMaster student, Saad Gaya, to charges of terrorism captured the
headlines of Canadian newspapers. Gaya was one of eighteen al-Qaeda
affiliates also charged with planning to blow up trucks loaded with
bombs at the Toronto Stock Exchange, the Toronto office of the Canadian
Security intelligence Service and a military base on Ontario. He was the
eleventh to be convicted. The remaining seven members of the group,
known as the "Toronto 18,” remain in prison awaiting trial. Such
statements of fact have done little to persuade McMaster to drop the
lawsuit, and my trial is set for April 2010.
In Canada, as in England and Brazil, truth is not an absolute defense.
No American citizen should be stripped of his/her Constitutional rights
by foreign countries or foreign entities.
Congress should act immediately to pass the Free Speech Protection Act
2009.
About Dr. Paul L. Williams,
PhD
Dr. Paul L. Williams, PhD, is an American
author, journalist and consultant on radical Islam and
counterterrorism. He is also an adjunct professor of humanities.
He is the author of six books, including The Day of Islam: The
Annihilation of America and the Western World, in which he
expands on the American Hiroshima scenario he believes to be
imminent, in which simultaneous nuclear attacks on 7 to 10
American cities would create havoc in American society. Prior to
this, he served for seven years as a consultant to the FBI about
terrorist and mafia criminal organizations. |