NewMediaJournal.us
www.NewMediaJournal.us
Return
to Article
Kindle Compatible
Paul R. Hollrah, O.E.
Testosterone Shortage Strikes GOP
December 15,
2009
Medical dictionaries tell us that testosterone is an
anabolic steroid that is produced in the bodies of both males and females.
And while females are, from a behavioral standpoint, more sensitive to the
hormone than males, an adult
human male produces, on average, about forty to sixty times more
testosterone than an adult human female.
In the human male, testosterone plays a key role in the development of
uniquely male physical characteristics... male sex organs, facial and
body hair, muscle mass, and vocal quality. It is also thought to be a
major contributing factor in the level of competitiveness and
aggressiveness among males.
However, Deborah Blum, author of
Sex on the Brain, tells us that there's a lot of "quick political
reaction” to theories about a cause-and-affect role for testosterone in
competition and aggression. She says, "Feminists become understandably
annoyed by the oversimplified, back-to-the-kitchen notion that women
don't have the hormonal underpinnings for competition. And plenty of
men...masculinists, if you like...are equally annoyed at being dismissed
as a bunch of naturally bad-tempered apes."
Clearly, Ms. Blum has not spent a great deal of time around
conservatives and Republicans in recent times. At a time in our nation’s
history when events call for conservative leaders to be "naturally
bad-tempered apes,” almost to a man, those of the male gender who speak
for conservatives and Republicans are milquetoast wimps. It’s almost as
if conservative and Republicans had been tossed into a gigantic
centrifuge and spun until all of the testosterone resided in the bodies
of conservative women.
On the Republican side of the aisle in Congress we find few truly
courageous and outspoken members. Senators Tom Coburn and Jim Inhofe of
Oklahoma are exceptions. Coburn is an outspoken critic of wasteful
government spending and unworkable healthcare reform, while Inhofe plays
that same role on cap-and-trade and other environmental issues. What is
needed is for Republicans in Congress to emulate former senator Alan
Simpson (R-WY), a man who was never at a loss for words.
When asked why they are not more aggressive in their response to
Democrats and their policies, Senate Republicans would likely murmur
something about the Senate being the world’s foremost "gentlemen’s
club.” A "gentlemen’s club” run by the likes of Harry Reid and Dick
Durbin?
Whatever strength of character the Republican Party enjoyed during the
Reagan years quickly dissipated when Reagan left the White House and
George H.W. Bush moved in. In October 1986, Vanity Fair published a
feature-length article titled, "Is George Bush too nice to be
President?” In preparing the article, writer Gail Sheehy traveled with
the Bush campaign for weeks, during which time she interviewed dozens of
Bush’s senior advisors, campaign aides, closest friends, and family
members. She asked all of them the same set of questions, one of which
was, "What is it that George Bush feels passionately about?”
Not surprisingly, none of the people closest to Bush had a ready
answer...not even his own wife. After thinking for a moment they all
came up with inane responses such as "Peace,” "Justice,” or "Fairness.”
Then, after being elected, Bush thought he could make a gentlemen’s
agreement with House and Senate Democrats to sign some targeted tax
increases...mostly federal user taxes that did not affect the general
public...in exchange for the Democrats’ agreement to cut federal
spending. It must have come as a huge surprise to him that there is no
honor among Democrats. He signed their tax increases and then sat back
to await the spending cuts...which never materialized. The Democrats
merely laughed at his gullibility and used his "read my lips, no new
taxes” pledge to defeat him for reelection in 1992. He never once
mentioned the Democrats’ treachery in his own defense.
In 1994, Newt Gingrich and other Republicans signed a "Contract with
America,” promising much-needed reform in Congress. The voters responded
positively and Republicans experienced four productive years between
January 1995 and January 1999, conducting themselves as we would expect
them to. But then, when Gingrich chose not to seek reelection in 1998,
the House leadership fell to Dennis Hastert (R-IL) and Tom Delay
(R-TX)...both of whom set about organizing a congressional majority that
was indistinguishable from Democrats.
Hastert and Delay were still there when George W. Bush arrived on the
scene in 2000, cozying up to liberals and the mainstream media by
claiming to be a "compassionate” conservative...Apparently unaware that
conservatism was and always has been the soul of compassion, it was
further proof that Bush really didn’t know what it meant to be a
conservative. And when he failed to use his veto pen even once to
restrain a profligate Republican Congress, it was clear that he was also
a stranger to traditional Republican values.
What Bush and the Frist-Hastert-Delay Congress did was to make it
impossible for lifelong rank-and-file Republicans to defend the party
that has always been the last best hope for America.
Who can deny that the ultimate fate of our country was set in concrete
during the Roosevelt Administration when New Deal Democrats decided that
political power could be solidified by purchasing the allegiance of
special interests...interest groups and individuals who wanted something
from government...and using other people’s money to do it?
The Democrats accelerated their march toward a socialist Utopia with the
New Frontier and the Great Society of the Kennedy-Johnson era, they
gained momentum during the Carter and Clinton administrations when they
decided that they could solidify the black vote by forcing banks to make
mortgage loans to people with little or no ability to repay the loans,
and they reached full fruition in 2008 when they elected an ineligible
Marxist to the White House, elected a San Francisco radical as House
Speaker, and gained a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, led by
the Searchlight, Nevada flash, Harry Reid.
The complete socialization of America and the destruction of the
capitalist system has been the sole raison d’être of the Democratic
Party for more than seventy-five years, and were it possible to paint a
picture of what party leaders have seen as their ultimate dream during
all those years, the Obama Administration and the Pelosi-Reid Congress
would be their ideal. The current crop of Democrats in the White House
and in Congress are simply the most evil and corrupt group of
politicians ever to set foot in Washington. It is Chicago-San
Francisco-Las Vegas social and political morality transported to
Washington and customized to engulf the entire nation.
One political commentator described the current status of Obamacare as
"a moment in history.” To which syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer
responded, "Yes, and Waterloo was also a moment in history.” At a moment
in history when all but a few national Democrats appear intent upon
committing political suicide, there are few competent leaders on the
Republican side to urge them on and to hasten the day.
As matters now stand, the shortage of testosterone among conservative
and Republican men is so critical that, as conservatives move to capture
the ground that Democrats abandon, we will likely be led by women and
minorities.
Among the most effective and outspoken conservative women we have
Michelle Bachman, Tammy Bruce, Amanda Carpenter, Mona Charen, Linda
Chavez, Liz Cheney, Ann Coulter, Monica Crowley, Carly Fiorina, Mary
Katharine Ham, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin, K.T. McFarland, Angela
McGlowan, Kate Obenshain, Sarah Palin, Star Parker, Dana Perino, Frances
Rice, Kathy Rothschild, Phyllis Schlafly, Teri Thompson, and Meg
Whitman...to name just a few. They are joined by a growing number of
strong and eloquent black men, such as Herman Cain, Jay Parker, Rev.
Wayne Perryman, Lt. Col. Allen West (USA, Retired), and Walter Williams.
But where are the truly fearless conservative white men...the "naturally
bad-tempered apes” of whom Deborah Blum spoke? In the eleven months
since George W. Bush left office, Barack Obama and the Democrats in
Congress have blamed him for almost everything but the sinking of the
Lusitania. Dick Cheney has not taken it lying down; he has attempted to
set the record straight. But Bush has spent full time turning the other
cheek...by his silence, lending credence to the charges made against
him.
Has
Vanity Fair ever received an acceptable answer to its question? It
should be obvious to all by now that George H.W. Bush was too nice to be
president. But now we can add Bob Dole, George W. Bush, and John McCain
to the list. Because liberals and Democrats are what they are, the last
thing the country needs is wimpish "nice guy” Republicans in the Oval
Office. If they don’t possess enough real testosterone to act like
"naturally bad-tempered apes” when the occasion demands, then we don’t
need them. They can fall into the ranks with the rest of us.
About Paul R. Hollrah, O.E.
Paul R. Hollrah is a
freelance writer. He is a member of the Civil Engineering Academy of
Distinguished Alumni at the University of Missouri - Columbia and a
Senior Fellow at the Lincoln Heritage Institute. He currently resides in
Tulsa, Oklahoma.