
Paul R. Hollrah
Bernie & Ruth & Chuck & Hillary
March 16,
2009
No,
we’re not suggesting a sequel to the 1969 film, Bob & Carol & Ted &
Alice, a film starring Natalie Wood, Robert Culp, Elliott Gould, and
Dyan Cannon as hip new-age couples struggling with the temptations of
mate-swapping. What concerns us here is a much more serious real-life
drama in which some 4,800 investors have been defrauded of an estimated
$64.8 billion by an unscrupulous New York investment advisor, Bernard
Madoff. Although, given the principal actors in the film and in the
ongoing Madoff scandal, some interesting parallels might be drawn.
Madoff, CEO of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC, a Wall
Street investment advisory, former Chairman of the NASDAQ Exchange,
admired and trusted by thousands of America’s wealthiest individuals and
foundations, has done more to destroy the faith of the American people
in those who are entrusted with the responsibility for growing and
managing our invested capital than any living human being. Because of
Madoff, millions of Americans now lay awake at night questioning whether
their stock portfolios, their mutual funds, and their annuities are safe
and secure.
On a
day when Madoff faced hundreds of his investors in a Manhattan
courtroom, before being assigned a prisoner number and hauled off to
jail, more questions have been raised than have been answered. Most
importantly, to what extent have the bureaucrats at the Securities &
Exchange Commission (SEC) failed in their responsibility to regulate and
police the securities industry? In the Madoff case they obviously
dropped the ball, and it’s not because they weren’t warned.
For
example, we know that in 2005, a Boston investment advisor and
derivatives expert, Harry Markopolos, submitted a nineteen-page report,
anonymously, to the SEC saying it was "highly likely” that Madoff
Securities was "the world's largest Ponzi Scheme.” Markopolos reminded
the SEC that he had first brought the Madoff matter to the attention of
their Boston field office in 1999, during the Clinton Administration,
but no action was taken. In his report he asked the SEC to be discreet
about circulating the report, saying, "I am worried about the personal
safety of myself and my family.”
In
his filing, Markopolos suggested two possible scenarios. Under Scenario
#1, which he described as "unlikely,” he said, "I am submitting this
case under Section 21A(e) of the 1934 Act in the event that the
broker-dealer and (electronic communication network) depicted is
actually providing the stated returns to investors, but is earning those
returns by front-running customer order flow. Front running qualifies as
insider trading since it relies upon material, non-public information,
that is acted upon for the benefit of one party to the detriment of
another party.”
Under
Scenario #2, which Markopolos described as "highly likely,” he said,
"Madoff Securities is the world’s largest Ponzi Scheme. In this case
there is no SEC reward payment due the whistle-blower so basically I’m
turning this case in because it’s the right thing to do.”
In
neither case was any action taken by the SEC auditors. Why? Is it
because Madoff has friends in high places? The Center for Responsive
Politics has looked into the Madoff family’s political contributions
between June 1993 and October 2008. Federal Election Commission records
show that members of the Madoff family made some 250 political
contributions to 45 candidates and committees totaling $391,350. .
Two
of the largest recipients of Madoff family cash were Senators Chuck
Schumer (D-NY), $27,000, and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) $23,500. The
Madoff family also made seven contributions totaling more than $104,000
to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, a committee chaired by
Schumer. Other major recipients of Madoff cash were Cong. Ed Markey
(D-MA), $34,000; and Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), $25,000.
So
how did Madoff Investment Securities, "the world’s largest Ponzi
Scheme,” escape detection for over a decade in both Democratic and
Republican administrations? Did senior Democrats in Congress take steps
to run interference for Madoff?
Those
within the SEC, past and present, who had every opportunity to
intervene, but didn’t, must be brought before Congress and publicly
exposed. And those who refuse to disclose details of how they managed to
overlook Madoff’s criminal activity should be indicted and prosecuted
According to The Washington Post, an internal probe at the SEC is said
to focus, in part, on the relationship between Madoff’s niece, Shana
Madoff, and her husband, Eric Swanson. Shana Madoff served as compliance
officer for the Madoff firm, while Swanson, a former SEC official, was
involved in a 2004 SEC examination of Madoff’s business prior to their
marriage. Swanson also conducted an internal review of a Madoff
examination that occurred in 1999.
The
SEC maintains, according to the Post, that Swanson played no role in any
Madoff examinations after the onset of his personal relationship with
Shana Madoff. And while it would be irresponsible not to examine what
impact the Madoff-Swanson relationship might have had on the SEC’s
overall failures, it is unlikely that Swanson would have been in a
position to have a controlling influence over multiple SEC
investigations of that magnitude.
Two
other possibilities present themselves. First, as Madoff heads off to
prison… probably for the rest of his life… some question whether he
entered a guilty plea, without offering a defense and without the
benefit of a jury trial, in order to protect his wife, Ruth, his
brother, Peter, and his two sons, Mark and Andrew, from being
prosecuted. That suspicion will likely cause federal investigators to
look more closely at the role played by other members of the Madoff
family.
And
finally, for a case of this magnitude to be rushed through the system,
from indictment to incarceration, in such a short time frame makes one
wonder if there are not more powerful forces acting behind the scenes.
If undue influence was exerted in Washington it is much more likely that
such pressure would have come from influential members of Congress. The
SEC should be required to provide copies of all emails and other
communications, written and telephonic, between members of Congress and
the Madoff firm. And if that avenue of investigation runs into a
roadblock we can be relatively certain that we are on the right track.
The story of Bernie & Ruth & Chuck & Hillary might prove to be far more
intriguing, and far more rife with villains, than that of Bob & Carol &
Ted & Alice.