Recent Articles
Amazing Grace: The American Sequel
Electoral Reform: The Multiple Vote
The Electoral College Has Failed
Real Electoral Reform
Something is Rotten...in the US Senate
Obama’s “Butt Boys”
Off with Their Heads
Our Sacred Cows are Coming Home to Roost
The Impatient Mr. Fitzgerald
Russian Democracy: A Missed Opportunity
Slackers & Useful Idiots

About Paul R. Hollrah
Paul R. Hollrah is a freelance writer. He is a member of the Civil Engineering Academy of Distinguished Alumni at the University of Missouri - Columbia and a Senior Fellow at the Lincoln Heritage Institute. He currently resides in Tulsa, Oklahoma.


Paul R. Hollrah

Amazing Grace: The American Sequel
January 15, 2009
 

One of the finest film productions in recent years has been the British film, Amazing Grace, the story of how William Wilberforce, a young idealist in the British Parliament during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, waged a decades-long struggle to bring an end to the slave trade in the British Empire.

 

I can well remember the end of the movie. As the screen went dark and the credits began to roll, no one moved... everyone in the theater sat quietly as if glued to their seats. And then, as the house lights came on and moviegoers began to usher silently from the theater, I’m sure that most white moviegoers felt the same overwhelming sense of sadness that I felt. One can only imagine what black moviegoers must have felt.

 

William Wilberforce was first elected to Parliament in September 1780, at the age of twenty-one, and quickly earned a reputation as a reformer. In 1783, he was introduced to a former ship’s surgeon, The Rev. James Ramsay, who had observed firsthand the living conditions of slaves, both aboard ship and on the plantations of St. Kitts, in the Caribbean.

 

Deeply moved by what he heard, it spelled the beginning of what was to become the central purpose of Wilberforce’s life for the next fifty years. Wilberforce became the champion of the anti-slavery cause and the anti-slavery movement had what it needed most, a strong and relentless voice in Parliament.

 

The years that followed were a mixture of success and failure. Bills to reduce overcrowding on slave ships were passed. A “toothless” compromise calling for “gradual abolition” passed in 1792. A bill to outlaw the use of British ships in the slave trade failed in 1794. A bill to prohibit British subjects from aiding or abetting the slave trade to the French colonies passed in 1806. Bills designed to outright abolish the slave trade failed numerous times over a forty year period.

 

But finally, on July 26, 1833, just three days before Wilberforce’s death, a bill to abolish slavery was passed by Parliament. His fifty year struggle to end slavery in the British Empire was won posthumously.

 

Thus, if it is true that confession is food for the soul, the British people have now publicly made their confession. What remains now is for Americans to make the same cathartic confession, telling the powerful story of slavery and emancipation in our own country. Unfortunately, while it is a story that demands to be told, it is a story that Hollywood filmmakers will likely ignore because it would be entirely too damaging, perhaps even fatal, to the Democratic Party. For example:

 

▪ It was Democrats, northern and southern, who insisted that slaves be counted as just three- fifths of a person... a device designed to increase the congressional representation of the slave states, while maintaining the fiction that a black man was something less than a white man.

 

▪ It was Democrats, northern and southern, who enacted the Fugitive Slave Laws of 1793 and 1854 and who gave new life to the pro-slavery movement with the enactment of the Missouri Compromise and the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

 

▪ It was Democrats, northern and southern, who opposed the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, outlawing slavery and giving blacks full citizenship and voting rights.

 

▪ It was Democrats, northern and southern, who opposed passage of the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1875.

 

▪ It was Democrats, northern and southern, who embraced the Ku Klux Klan as the party’s own paramilitary arm, achieving through terror, arson, and murder, that which they could no longer achieve within the law.

 

▪ It was Democrats who enacted Black Codes, denying African Americans the same rights and privileges afforded to whites, and it was Democrats who enacted the Jim Crow laws, restricting the use of public accommodations by blacks.

 

It was not until the presidency of Lyndon Baines Johnson in the 1960s, when Democrats began to see African Americans as a potentially valuable voting bloc, that the party embraced equality in education and job opportunities for blacks.

 

All of these things are part of our history, but if one were to ask the average black man-on-the-street to recite a credible history of the black man in America, few would be able to do so.

 

Whatever black history is taught in our public schools and on our college campuses is a fraud. It is written by and taught by individuals with a left wing agenda who fully understand the value of the black vote and who value political success at the polls above all else. They understand that, if African Americans were to vote in roughly the same proportions as the rest of the population (53-47 percent for Democrats over Republicans, or vice versa), Democratic strength in the U.S. Congress and the state legislatures would be reduced by half, or more, and the election of a Democratic president would be next to impossible.

 

It is far better to simply deny the truth to black people, young and old alike.

 

But truth is truth and it cannot be suppressed forever, no matter whose ox is being gored. Let us hope that, with the election of Barack Obama as President of the United States, we have arrived at a point in history where we can actually begin to tell the truth about ourselves... painful as it may be. If Mel Gibson had the courage to produce and film The Passion of the Christ, perhaps there is also someone in Hollywood with the courage to produce a film titled, Amazing Grace – The American Sequel.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The New Media Journal.us © 2010
A Division of BasicsProject.org