
Paul R. Hollrah
The End of the Culture War
November 4, 2008
In a September 8,
2008 article titled, “The Culture War’s Decisive Battle has Begun,”
Herbert E. Meyer describes, clearly and succinctly, the opposing sides
in the culture war that has dominated American politics for decades.
He begins with the observation that, in every war,
there is a decisive battle… a battle that does not end the war but which,
from the perspective of history, is the moment at which one side’s
ultimate victory – and the other side’s defeat – is sealed. He cites
Gettysburg as the decisive battle of the Civil War and Midway as the
decisive battle of World War II. And he is convinced that this year’s
presidential election is shaping up to be the decisive battle of the
Culture War.
Meyer explains,
“On one side are the Traditionalists. We believe that church and State
should be separate, but that religion should remain at the center of
life. We are a Judeo-Christian culture, which means we consider those
ten things on a tablet to be commandments, not suggestions. We believe
that individuals are more important than groups, that families are more
important than governments, that children should be raised by their
parents rather than by a village, and that marriage is a sacred
relationship between a man and a woman. We believe that rights must be
balanced by responsibilities, that personal freedom is a privilege we
must be careful not to abuse, and that the rule of law cannot be set
aside when it becomes inconvenient.
“We believe in economic liberty, property rights, and in giving
purposeful and industrious entrepreneurs the elbowroom they need to
start and run their businesses – and thus create jobs for all the rest
of us – with a minimum of government interference...(W)e believe that
despite its imperfections the United States is history’s most blessed
country, and when attacked we will defend this country with our lives.”
He continues, “On the other side of this Culture War are the Left Wing
Liberals. They are uncomfortable with our traditions, with the
inevitable inequalities of our free-market economy, and with our
military power. They dislike our values, our morality, and our unabashed
displays of patriotism. At first – back in the 1960s – they were content
merely to develop and pursue their own radical culture within ours. They
tuned out, turned to drugs, and pushed the level of sexual license to a
point our country had never known. They were so distressed by our
imperfections that they refused to recognize or celebrate our
achievements.
“Then they tuned in, and developed a political agenda whose logical
outcome would be the overthrow of the American Revolution itself. While
we believe that power flows from God to the people, they believe the
supreme power is the State, which decides what rights, if any, should be
allowed to the people. And because there is no God above the State,
there also is no truth; no such thing as right or wrong, good or evil.
Since they are working to do good – by their definition of
the word – whatever crimes they commit along the way don’t matter. But
if we are bent on doing what they define as harm, they will use
any legal trick in the book to stop us. In short, the rule of law means
whatever they want it to mean at any given moment.
“They believe that rights are more important than responsibilities, that
groups are more important than individuals, and that one’s stand on
public issues is more important than one's private actions or morality.
And while they are careful never to condone the tactics of our country’s
foreign enemies, they always see some justification in our enemies’
cause. They don't actually want us to be defeated by our foreign
enemies; they wish merely to see us humbled and humiliated by them.”
In his September 8, 2008 Best of the Web
column, James Taranto observes that “until 10 days ago, it looked as if
there wouldn’t be much hatred at all in this year’s campaign...neither
man has aroused much true hatred.” But, he says, “McCain’s vice
presidential nominee...is arousing a lot of it.”
Taranto goes on to
quote columnist Nick Cohen of London's left-wing Observer, who says, “My
colleagues in the American liberal press had little to fear at the start
of the week...But instead of protecting their precious advantage, they
succumbed to a spasm of hatred and threw the vase, the crockery, the
cutlery and the kitchen sink at an obscure politician from
Alaska...Hatred is the most powerful emotion in politics...Hate can sell
better than hope. When a hate campaign goes wrong, however, disaster
follows.”
Needless to say, the American left’s campaign of
hatred against Sarah Palin has gone terribly wrong. It has turned
against them and the more they mock her and attack her, the more popular
she becomes.
The world has produced few transcendent leaders in the
last century, but whenever they have been needed most, they have
appeared...almost as if by providence. When the forces of fascism
overran Europe, Winston Churchill was there to lead the fight against
it. And when totalitarian communism engulfed the Soviet Union and all of
Eastern Europe, Ronald Reagan was there to defeat it. And now, as a
bitter Culture War threatens to “overthrow the American Revolution,” we
must find a leader who can lead us to victory in the decisive battle.
Would it be overly presumptuous to believe that Gov.
Sarah Palin might be such a transcendent figure? Never mind what
conservatives and Republicans might say about her...their opinions would
be dismissed as biased by elitist liberals. But if the seething hatred
and the intense fear that Palin generates among liberals and Democrats
is any indication of the role that she is capable of playing in the
outcome of the Culture War, then perhaps our search is over.
As former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, a leading
Democrat has said of Palin, “She didn’t have to prove she was ‘of the
people.’ She really is the people.” She is, as another writer
describes her, “The embodiment of everything the left has been railing
against for decades.”
Every election is an important event in history, but
none have had the overriding significance of the General Election of
November 4, 2008. This election will determine whether our country will
continue on toward perfecting the greatest experiment in self-governance
known to man, or if, by electing Barack Obama, we will declare the
experiment to have been a failure and take a sharp turn to the
left...down the road toward neo-fascism.
A recent poll tells us that 30% of Democrats say they
will not vote for a black candidate. However, if those Democrats decide
to ignore their long-held prejudices, just because Obama has a “D”
behind his name, that may be enough to turn the election in his favor.
The American Revolution and everything it stands for will have been
overturned and the United States will be well on its way to becoming a
socialist “paradise,” much like Cuba today or the Soviet Union of the
last century.
On the other hand, if the voters choose John McCain
and Sarah Palin to lead us, then the good guys will have won the Culture
War, the Democratic Party will suffer a mortal wound, and the nation’s
pollsters will be thoroughly discredited, once and for all.
Either way, the end
of the Culture War is at hand. Which road will we take?