I’m enjoying the
prime time primaries, carefully considering what each politician
brings to the table as they all campaign to participate in what
policy wonks might consider the political equivalent of the National
League and American League playoffs in baseball.
It’s exciting and
compelling observing the players moves; assessing "statistics”
comprised of voting records and accomplishments; and listening to
analysts determine the catalyst behind voter reactions, compare and
contrast the candidates’ styles, analyze the spin, and comment on
occasional heartfelt passion, as each contender competes to "go to
the show,” our nation’s 2008 presidential election.
After the Democrats
choose their candidate and the Republicans choose their candidate,
each will compete to win the electoral votes in the 50 states. They
do not win based on the popular vote; they win based on which states
electoral votes they’ve earned. This is not unlike the World Series
in baseball. The team that takes the series becomes the champion
based on the best of seven games played, not on the number of runs
cumulatively earned during the series.
Each contender
canvasses the country, focusing on a variety of constituents who
make up the voting blocks; single woman, black voters, Latino
voters, compassionate conservatives, Hawks, Doves, religious right,
etc. Each special interest group’s combined influence can make the
difference between taking or losing a state. In one sense,
politicians seem to cater to these factions, yet in another sense
they are forced to consider their interests and promise to represent
these interests if elected in office. This is our system of checks
and balances at work, making sure that each person, in each group,
in each state is considered on their own merit and that the electors
represent the majority in their state. It is in this way, our
president will represent a United States.
The number of electoral votes of each state is the sum of its
number of U.S. Senators (always two) and its U.S. Representatives;
the District of Columbia has three electoral votes. I learned the
importance of the Electoral College by playing a game called
Landslide when I was just a kid. At the end of the game, the
Vote cards are meaningless; the only thing that counts is how many
states you’ve won through these vote cards. It is because of this
game that I understood the worth of winning such states as New York,
California, Illinois, Florida, and Texas. I also learned that while
you can win a state early on, it can be taken right from under you
if you are not careful.
Finally, this game illustrated why we have two houses of
Congress; the House of Representatives is balanced by the Senate, in
which each state is represented equally no matter what the size.
As we watch the
Candidates make their cases to the people, building a base of
support for their election, while at the same time learning
intimately what issues are most important to Americans, we need to
take a moment and be grateful to the Founders for developing a
peaceful process for changing office and for ensuring that this
truly is a government by the people, of the people, and for the
people. Simply look at what just took place in Pakistan with the
assassination of its former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto,
Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe murdering people to make sure he stays in
office, and Russia’s Vladimir Putin handpicking his successor in
Russia. Conservative or Liberal, who ever wins office in the
upcoming election is an American who will take an oath to protect
our Constitution.
"I do solemnly
swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability,
preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Take this
opportunity to listen to the candidates and listen to how people
across the United States are responding to their messages. No matter
who wins, no matter what are differences, we are all Americans.