As published in The
World & I Magazine
According to the
AMA, in many communities around the United States, there is a
physician shortage, which presents a serious health care problem.
For a host of reasons, more than twenty million people are affected
by the inability to access quality medical services. While the
premise of a popular television show, "Northern Exposure,” alluded
to this very predicament some time ago, most viewers were likelier
caught up in the relationships between the quirky inhabitants of
Cicely, Alaska instead of pondering the very real implications for
those without access to a qualified doctor.1
Similar to the
circumstances in which the main character, Dr. Joel Fleischman, upon
graduating from Columbia University medical school (which he
attended on a scholarship from the state of Alaska), finds himself
assigned to be the General Practitioner of a tiny Alaskan town in
order to pay for his education, "medical schools have
adopted a selective medical school admission policy to enhance a
primary care choice in underserved communities.”2
The reality, though, is that while some students eventually
practice in underserved communities, others do not.
Limited access to
medical care is not always because doctors are unavailable. When
ill, people who live in urban areas are sometimes unable to travel
on a crowded bus or take other forms of mass transit in order to
receive medical care.3
Other reasons
creating an inability to meet the demand for physician services
include population growth, a larger number of people living beyond
age sixty-five and needing the most services, doctors working fewer
hours, some specialty areas, such as ER, are more attractive because
of their less demanding schedules (primary care is more
time-intensive), and our supply of physicians from U.S. medical
schools is not growing.4
However, the reason
which might cause the greatest concern is that there are several
states which do not cap non-economic damage awards in medical
negligence cases, which has created sky rocketing insurance premiums
for medical providers. Many doctors refuse to practice in states
like Nevada, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oregon, Illinois, and Wisconsin,
which make it more difficult to grow a financially lucrative
practice without having to work twelve-hour days to generate more
income to cover these additional insurance costs, or in which their
careers can be jeopardized by settling in sometimes unwarranted
lawsuits.
‘"When there’s a
potential for an enormous jury award, of which trial attorneys may
receive one-third or more, lawyers may be more willing to take a
chance on a case involving a sad outcome, whether actual negligence
was involved or not. "Defending these extra suits will surely tax
our health care system because they will lead to higher medical
liability premiums,” said Susan Turney, MD, who is Executive Vice
President/CEO of the Wisconsin Medical Society.5
According to a
survey taken by The American Hospital Association, there are
seventeen "crisis states," so defined by their legal and legislative
environment. They experience difficulty with both recruiting
physicians and with finances and operations. Hospitals blame
increased professional liability expenses for lost physicians,
reduced coverage in their emergency departments, and ability to
provide obstetric services. As a result of an inability to recruit
enough medical school graduates to fill their OB/GYN residency
slots, hospitals in Pennsylvania are interviewing a greater
proportion of residency applicants from international medical
schools, whose level of education is much harder to ascertain.6
"A study published
in early July [2003] by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) found
that states with caps on noneconomic damage awards or total damage
awards in malpractice cases benefit from about twelve percent more
physicians per capita than states without such laws.”7
In states without
caps, there are longer wait times for some medical services, such as
colonoscopies, and available specialists and general practitioners
can’t always accept new referrals because of their heavy workload.
It might seem
logical to just graduate more doctors to help meet the growing
demand for them, but the number of applicants is dropping. Also,
many medical school applicants are forced to attend foreign medical
schools because there are only 126 accredited medical schools in the
U.S.
"There have been
two newly accredited schools since 1980: Mercer University School of
Medicine in Georgia, and Florida State University College of
Medicine. That’s an annual increase of less than 0.1 percent--an
order of magnitude smaller than the U.S. population growth rate of
about .9 percent, according to the 2002 CIA World Factbook.”8
Alison Stewart
speculates in Consumer Health Journal that one reason contributing
to the shortage of medical schools located in the U.S. stems from
the fact that they are so tightly regulated, such as requiring
accreditation by doctor-run organizations like LCME, which is
jointly run by the AAMC and the American Medical Association.
In addition to
this, "It costs quite a bit to start a new medical school" said Dr.
David Stevens, vice president of the medical school standards and
assessment for the AAMC, and current secretary of the Liaison
Committee on Medical Education, or LCME, the group in charge of
accrediting new medical schools.”9
Furthermore, it is
partially because of costs associated with being able to meet these
regulations, that no foreign school has been able to create a campus
in the United States and that existing schools find it difficult to
expand their operations; they are seemingly unable to meet all the
conventions which must be satisfied without putting their existing
accreditation in jeopardy.
It is the opinion
of George Howley, the 1999 director of Casper, Area Economic
Development Alliance, that the reason for such resistance to Ross
University, based in the Caribbean, establishing a campus in Wyoming
was because "doctors are opposed to the potential competition, not
to the supposed risk of lower-quality care." He further explained
the reasoning was "to protect the income to the doctors."10
The litigation
surrounding the practice of medicine, a shortage of doctors, and
population growth all have contributed to the changing face of
medical care. One result of the increased liability risks faced by
doctors is what is referred to as "Managed Risk Medicine” which can
result in "ordering superfluous tests or choosing treatments based
on their likelihood to lead to a malpractice lawsuit.11
Additionally, when
the FDA delays approval of new products, it has the effect of
reducing their potential profitability, potentially influencing
pharmaceutical companies to focus on refining previously approved
products instead of investing in new ones.12
An online
publication called Advantage, an industry brief on health care,
lists a multitude of ways in which the delivery of medicine is
changing in order to become more cost effective, easier to access,
and streamlined. The following are just some of the interesting
developments.
--Stores such as
CVS, Target, Cub Foods, and Wal-mart are testing non-urgent care
clinics, staffed by physician extenders (physician assistants and
nurses), to treat minor conditions such as colds and sore throats.
--Individuals can
store and manage their own electronic medical records online or on a
Medic Alert e-Healthkey, which is a key fob that both controls
access to network services and information and is a USB flash drive
patients can carry with them.
--For a fee,
medical billing advocates can help patients decode their hospital/
medical bills and suggest ways to make insurers cover out-of-pocket
charges and fight hospital overcharges.
--Employers are
offering preventive health screenings at work, such as blood
pressure checks, cholesterol tests, and online health screenings.
They are also offering wellness seminars.
--The AAMC proposes
raising medical school enrollment by 15 percent over the next 10
years, or 2,500 new medical school graduates each year.
--Physicians
groups have begun buying their own medical facilities, such as
"specialty hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers and diagnostic
imaging centers in a bid to gain greater control of their practices
and to provide alternate revenue streams in an increasingly
regulated industry.”13
--Consumer-directed
health plans are being offered by more and more employers. In such
plans, employees have the freedom to see any provider, but have the
benefit of lower out-of-pocket expenses by using preferred
providers.14
Consumer-Driven
Health Plans
A Health
Care Reimbursement Account (HCRA) or flexible spending account "is a
tax-exempt account funded by an employee or employer that the
employee uses to pay health care expenses. Employees cannot withdraw
cash from an HCRA to pay for things other than health care. The
employee decides in advance how much money to put into the HCRA and
loses any unspent money in the HCRA at the end of the year. This
creates a "use it or lose it" incentive for higher health care
spending toward the end of the year and prevents employees from
using the account to save money.”15
Employee
contributions to a Medical Savings Account (MSA) "are exempt from
federal income tax, social security tax and (in many states) also
state income tax. MSAs are accompanied by a high-deductible health
insurance policy, not a generous low-deductible insurance policy.
MSA funds that are unspent at the end of the year 'roll over' to
future years and are not lost. MSAs allow individuals to withdraw
funds for purposes other than health care (after payment of taxes
and a fifteen percent penalty). MSAs move with an employee if he/she
changes employers.”16
Health
Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA), "are not taxed, must be used for
substantiated medical expenses, are accompanied by a high-deductible
insurance policy, and accumulate unspent money for future years. The
IRS guidance also says that employees can use HRA funds for health
care after leaving an employer, but this is still evolving. Some HRA
plans create virtual accounts in which payments for health care are
controlled by an employee, but the money actually stays with the
employer. In these situations, unspent account money may stay with
the employer if the employee leaves.”17
Experts predict
more than forty million
health savings accounts
(HSAs) will be established in the next ten years, making them the
most popular form of health care financing available. With an HSA,
workers under age sixty-five can accumulate tax-free savings for
lifetime health care needs if they are part of a qualified insurance
plan (one with a minimum deductible of $1,000 for individuals and
$2,000 for families). Individuals with self-only policies can set
aside up to $2,600 in their HSA, while families can set aside up to
$5,150 a year. Health Care News reported that major drawbacks to the
accounts include high deductibles, higher employee risk than with
other plans and lack of consumer education about the accounts. It
has also been determined that thirty-five percent of patients with
an HSA avoided obtaining care due to cost compared to seventeen
percent of patients with traditional health insurance.18
Health Savings
Security Accounts (HSSAs), "could be accompanied by a
high-deductible insurance policy (minimum of $500 for individual or
$1,000 for family coverage), but need not be accompanied by
high-deductible insurance if an individual is currently uninsured.”19
In addition, "HSSAs
would allow an employer, individual (employee), or both to make
tax-deductible contributions to the account of up to $2,000 per year
for individual coverage or $4,000 per year for family coverage.
Money could be withdrawn from an HSSA for purposes other than
medical expenses after payment of income tax plus a fifteen percent
penalty. The tax deductibility of contributions to HSSAs decreases
for individuals with incomes over $75,000 and families with incomes
over $150,000. When an account holder turns sixty-five, they can
withdraw money from an HSSA for non-medical purposes after paying
taxes but no fifteen percent penalty. HSSAs would be portable when
an employee changes employers.”20
In the field of
health insurance, a fixed amount paid to an organization (such as an
HMO) to provide all types of care for an individual is called
"capitation" payment. A fixed amount paid to one type of provider
(such as a Pediatrician) to provide only the care need from that
type of provider is called "sub-capitation" payment because it only
covers a subset of needed services. With a Customized Sub-Capitation
Plan (CSCP), an individual is given a choice among providers of each
type and is shown the sub-capitation premiums that each provider
charges. The customized premium that the individual pays is the sum
of the sub-capitation rates for the providers the individual
selects.
Possible advantages
of CSCPs include: flexibility in selecting providers based on
quality, prices, and personal preference; and relatively complete
insurance coverage without the out-of-pocket coverage gap common
among most Consumer Driven Health Plans.21
Association health
plan legislation continues to be introduced. Senate Bill l955,
Health Insurance Marketplace Modernization and Affordability Act of
2005, would amend "the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 (ERISA) to provide for the establishment and governance of
small business health plans, which are group health plans sponsored
by trade, industry, professional, chamber of commerce or similar
business associations that meet ERISA certification requirements.”22
Although the doctor shortage raises great concern, the market seems
to be responding to the rising health care costs with innovative
solutions, which may help alleviate the additional financial stress
placed on the consumer. If the AAMC truly has the power to help
boost medical school graduates by fifteen percent over the next ten
years, that will help. However, until litigation caps are imposed in
the seventeen "crisis” states, there will still be shortages of
doctors in areas where medical liability premiums discourage
establishing a practice.