|
| |
|
A
Little Knowledge Is a Dangerous Thing |
Education
Nancy Salvato, Education
Editor
July 4, 2007 |
|
"A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the
Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers
us again."
-- Alexander Pope
Around this time last year I participated in the Center
for Civic Education’s National Academy, where Professor Will Harris led
a selected group of students in 21 days of intense study on the basic
issues of political theory, and the values and principles of American
constitutional democracy. Early on, the importance of gaining a "surplus
of mind,” as a crucial element of the democratic process, was discussed.
In order to become thinkers or problem solvers, our citizenry must be
taught by teachers who are ambitious in their learning goals. When
teachers over simplify learning objectives, this conditions our
citizenry to fail at more complicated tasks. Conversely, giving the
populace the tools to figure out the world’s complexity enables each
person to be more powerful and free. Moreover, this is a necessary
component of our system of government.
To elaborate further, a surplus of knowledge is
especially useful when dealing with unexpected situations. When weighing
the possible consequences of a decision, an intelligent person draws on
these reserves. The key to "intelligence” is a capacity to weigh the
variables that come into play when assessing individual situations. A
surplus of knowledge gives us a reasonable shot at being able to
anticipate short and long term repercussions of actions or inaction.
Indeed, as a colleague of mine recently noted, every choice comes with
regret.
Our country cannot continue to be powerful and free if our citizens are
fed portion controlled knowledge. Civically responsible citizens must
develop the ability to think
divergently
and
convergently.
Citizens must exercise the capacity of mind to imagine and see the world
as a whole, instead of seeing only the parts. On a more basic level,
people need to recognize how others are effected, not just themselves.
Still, knowledge has and continues to be made entertaining and simple.
This is condescending because it assumes that the American people are
not that smart, or capable. The result is that our citizenry has become
befuddled and bemused – instead of a source of power. The people are no
longer in control, our system of power has become inverted and the
people have become the object of governmental rule. (We
Blame the Politicians but we put them there)
A citizen is one who rules and is ruled in turn. Under
the law, there must be the capacity for both. Our society was and is
founded on our citizenry having sufficient commitment to government. A
really good constitution constrains the way you think – naturalizes
itself, we come to think that way, constitutionally. When this happens,
our disagreements fall under the rubric of our Constitution because we
aren’t really that different. American political discourse, however, has
been corrupted. Political discourse should not be about conservatives
and liberals; at issue is identifying "Constitutional Perspectives” By
doing so, we can argue principles, not ideology. One way to think
constitutionally is to understand that there is a pendulum which leans
in the direction of individual rights and the sacrifice of some to be
part of the greater community. The Constitution is there to hold people
accountable to each other as part of a larger community. The duty of
public office should be to uphold the Constitution.
Although I agree with most of what my husband Frank
writes in the piece cited above, that politicians are elected to
represent their constituents, I don’t necessarily agree that them not
feeling beholden to any ideology or political party as being the
problem. The problem as I see it is that they don’t understand the
constitution and the citizens who elect them don’t understand the
constitution. Jefferson said, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed
from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Being willing
to defend our constitution is what binds us together as a people and a
community. Not understanding the importance of it is what is tearing us
apart.
|
|
Nancy Salvato is the Senior Editor for The New Media
Journal and serves as the President of
Basics Project,
a non-profit, non-partisan 501(C)(3) research and educational project whose mission is
to promote the education of the American public on the basic elements of
relevant political, legal and social issues important to our country...
[read
more] |
|