February 8, 2005
- Any serious academic discussion about the issues
confronting K-12 and higher education needs to cover the following subjects
if it is to be considered comprehensive in nature and scope. These
controversial topics must be debated in order to arrive at tenable solutions
for the future solvency of our academic institutions.
The range of concerns is so vast that it is worthwhile to classify them
under three broad categories: Curriculum and Instruction, Academic
Standards, and Delivery System. Although there are many areas that can and
should be considered, for now, the following fifteen ideas are a suitable
starting point from which to start questioning generally accepted standards
of practice and begin thinking "outside the box” of traditional education.
Under the category of Curriculum and Instruction falls the following:
1. Civic Education/US Constitution versus global/politically correct ideas:
The current focus in our schools reflects a global/politically correct
agenda. The media reports more on whether or not cultural diversity is
embraced by our teachers and students than on their woefully inadequate
grasp of Civic Responsibility or knowledge of the US Constitution. It is not
of large concern to educators because student mastery in these areas isn’t
really considered when measuring academic progress. Examples of society’s
ignorance in our nation’s history abound.
"This is one of the most dangerous bills we've had before
us," said
Molly Spearman, executive director of the S.C. Association of School
Administrators. "It's abandoning a covenant our founding fathers made to
provide a public education for everyone."
"I think the founders of this country had it right in creating public
schools to level the playing field for all children," she said. (St.
Paul Superintendent Pat Harvey)
Nowhere is public education mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. "The
Founders wanted most aspects of life managed by those who were closest to
them, either by state or local government or by families, businesses, and
other elements of civil society.”
Read More:
Cato Handbook for Congress
2. "Balanced Literacy” versus "Direct Instruction in Phonics”: It matters
not that student progress has gone down in reading ever since schools of
education began indoctrinating their teacher trainees in "whole language”
reading methods, now called, "balanced literacy”. A recent development in
Rockford Illinois
exemplifies "Educracy’s” indifference to product versus process in the
school system. It was more expedient to transfer a principal who bucked the
system by espousing "direct instruction” methods in phonics; producing
superior reading scores and proving the merits of this teaching practice,
than fight the educational establishment’s endorsement of inferior methods
of teaching; in this case, reading.
3. Textbooks: Much has been written about the inadequacy of textbooks due to
publishers guidelines which "screen out topics and ideas that might be
considered traditional or controversial or offensive.”
Bulky, heavy texts which easily become outdated should be replaced with
"modular” curriculums. Chapter length books and first source materials can
and should be mixed and matched. Teachers can focus on the areas which they
feel are most important. These books can be written by experts in the field
and their opinions can be considered as an addendum to the information.
Students wouldn’t be weighed down by full backpacks that can result in
bodily injury, not to mention function as a deterrent to actually completing
homework.
4. Vocational versus Academic track:
By eliminating the Arts and other curriculum tracks, we have limited student
access to what might be a chosen profession. They are given the subliminal
message that these fields are less important and not a worthwhile
undertaking. Yet in the real world, many non academic vocations pay very
well and provide good benefits.
5. Liberal Professors are not fairly representing conservative viewpoints
and are penalizing students for speaking out against liberal ideas. Today,
many students are rebelling by becoming Conservatives. Students shouldn’t
arrive at a belief in any particular persuasion until they have a
satisfactory idea about what must be considered in every situation.
6. Mandatory Mental Health Testing is a frightening proposition considering
that it serves to further an agenda in which people learn not to take
responsibility for their individual actions and move on; but rather to
obsess over their past and blame their environment and genetics for their
decisions. What else can explain lawsuits against fast food enterprises for
obesity and hot coffee? Making excuses will not result in achievement or
accomplishment. Labeling people with disorders limits their choices and
takes away individual responsibility for their actions. Making excuses won’t
get a job done. Recently,
a family sued a school district for assigning homework over summer break
and spoiling what was supposed to be a mental break. School break was never
about rest. It was to allow children to help with the responsibilities on
the farm. Now it’s become a right?
It’s hard to believe a school can be sued for doing their job. But mental
health will become the excuse for every child who fails to learn.
Ayn Rand’s book, Atlas Shrugged, is great for clarifying the difference
between producers and takers in society. No matter how many labels are
thought up to describe what’s considered abnormal behavior, the bottom line
is it is up to every individual to overcome adversity and obstacles and
become productive respectable citizens. Otherwise, society will carry the
burden of every person. I believe that is called Socialism and the last I
heard, we were a Democratic Republic. Of course, those not properly educated
in our history and constitution wouldn’t know the difference.
Academic Standards
7. Social Promotion continues, even under the auspices of NCLB. How can this
be?
John
Chubb reports that, "NCLB requires that all public schools bring all
students to "proficiency" within ten years but leaves it to the states to
define proficiency. In recent years many states had set tough proficiency
standards, but with their schools now threatened with federal sanctions,
states are lowering their definitions of proficiency.
8. Teacher Training:
There has been a question of whether or not schools of education adequately
prepare teachers for the demands of the classroom. Whether or not any of the
methodology or classroom management courses are useful is important and
deserves attention. However, to base a teacher’s compensation solely on this
type of coursework and number of years in the classroom is not fair and does
nothing to ensure that students are getting a quality education. Merit pay
should be based on the number of graduates, academic scores of students, and
overall ranking of the school in which they work. Just as better quality
food and merchandise commands more dollars, so should better quality
education.
Poor performing schools should provide teachers with financial and other
incentives to bring up the quality of education and pay teachers
accordingly. Contracts between parents and teachers would require that
parents put in the necessary time with their children to assure that
homework is completed, and in a timely manner. Parents who do not comply
will give up their rights over the child during the school year and these
students would become wards of the state, for educational purposes.
Discipline would be more manageable and wayward kids would be assigned
mentors, to help them complete their education.
9. Lowering of Expectations:
In many colleges, the emphasis has been on bringing in the educational
dollars to maintain their institutions and less on requiring a certain
standard of proficiency in those who receive a diploma. Many students
graduate from college unable to present clear and logical arguments orally
or in the written form.
10. Meaningless Diplomas:
A degree of motivation should be given equal consideration to the level of
education attained when a job candidate applies for a job. This is
especially important since many businesses report that they have to
remediate those hired so that they are able to fill in basic business forms,
count back change, and make a good impression on clients. The unreliability
of a diploma is further complicated by the fact that there are many fake
degrees and certifications that can be purchased over the internet; which
lend more suspicion to what are supposed to be reliable certificates of
achievement.
Delivery System
11. School Choice versus Controlled School Choice:
True choice in education gives parents complete control over where they send
their children for school. This means that parents should not have to pay
twice if they decide on private or independent education. Controlled School
Choice mandates that parents pay taxes to receive a publicly funded
education –be it good or bad. Parents have limited choices, within the
public school system, for alternative education than the local school. There
may be a charter school option, a magnet school option, or a school that is
making adequate yearly progress in their educational goals, but that’s about
the extent of any choice they are afforded. They may not necessarily be
provided transportation, the school might be a significant distance from
home and the neighborhood, and they may not be picked if the number of spots
is limited for one of their choices. Competition for students would improve
the quality of education in any situation. Entitlement of educational
dollars removes incentives.
12. Internet Learning is a boon to anyone with the resources and initiative
to take advantage of the opportunity. Any school teacher that suggests that
the internet is an inferior source for research is not moving into the 21st
century. The web is the most comprehensive source of information available
and being able to navigate the web and separate the wheat from the chafe is
something to encourage instead of employing antiquated methods of research
using only books and encyclopedias from the local library. Accessing
information instantly via a hyperlink is infinitely more efficient than
hunting through volumes of stacks to acquire the same information and more
suitable for the direction in which our world is moving. It looks as though
we’ll have to drag the educational community kicking and screaming into the
21st century.
13. English Language Learners:
We need a common language and that language is English. We are hindering the
ability of immigrants to take advantages of a free, economically advantaged
society if we aren’t encouraging them to learn our language and customs. Our
form of government is the best in the world and aliens need to understand
the importance of maintaining our way of life.
14. If we are to maintain a public school system, perhaps it would be more
advantageous to do so through a sales tax rather than a property tax. The
funding formulas for education would be less complicated and everyone would
be responsible for the cost of an education, including illegal aliens and
non-homeowners.
15. We must end the litigation to fund appropriate education because there
is no research to date which proves conclusively that more money in the
system will ensure that it makes it to the classroom. As a matter of fact,
it’s likelier that school districts will use more money for administration
than students. Instead of requiring families to utilize the public schools,
which may or may not be the best option for the kids, money for cost of an
alternative education should be available to those who don’t want a
public education. Lawsuits which allege that the funding of education is
inadequate to the task would never be an issue.
The judiciary would not have an opportunity to
legislate from the bench.
This is a starting point for enlightened discussion about all the issues
that must be addressed in order to improve education in the United States.
Whether or not the reader agrees with this analysis is not the point. The
task ahead is to prepare future generations for the responsibility of
maintaining this great republic …for which it stands…and in that, we are
failing.
|