New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Educational Reform Must Include Transparency and Competition
Education/Nancy Salvato
May 27, 2005 - While it was somewhat surprising to read that preschoolers are being suspended from school at alarming rates, that teachers were having great difficulty managing these young children did not catch me unawares. For all the media coverage given to funding and accountability in the public school system, in general very little attention is paid to early childhood education. Private preschool centers are forced to hire the least qualified to instruct those under their care for the simple reason that they cannot afford to properly compensate their teachers.

Head Start is one of the only early childhood programs that requires education certification of instructors and compensates at the level of other professional teachers. Yet the one oasis where professional instructors are given care of our youngest children has suffered from serious financial abuse and irregularities. Lobbying from the Head Start community has impeded "greater transparency in the program" which would "enable the public and the media to more closely examine the ways in which federal Head Start funds are being spent" according to John Boehner, Chairman of the Committee on Education and the Workforce.

Recently, "House education committee leaders introduced legislation that would introduce greater competition into the federal Head Start early childhood program and use it to strengthen school readiness, increase the role of states and local communities in Head Start, and protect children and taxpayers against the abuse and mismanagement of federal Head Start funds." The Bush administration is not only attempting to bring accountability to K-12 education, but has thankfully remembered to concern itself with the most vulnerable – the youngest members of this generation.

Establishing complete transparency in how education funding is allocated in the public school system is one of the most urgent reforms necessary to assure accountability in education. Let me say that again. Knowing how the money is spent and who is spending it is the only way to ensure financial accountability in education.

But there is more. Representative Boehner and his committee believe there should be greater competition within the early childhood program. Notice the familiar ring to this reform measure. NCLB has already established this precedent by encouraging choice within the public school system. But the administration needs to take this reform farther. Choice needs to include the private sector. Available funds must be made available to independent providers. Free market competition must be allowed to break the monopoly of public education.

Hard working, responsible Americans have the freedom to choose their food, clothing, and shelter. Good consumers seek the best value for their money. Parents should not be forced to enroll their children in a sub-par educational institution when there are superior alternatives available. Good parents want to take advantage of every opportunity available to enhance the development of their children. Why shouldn't they have the same choices when it comes to their children's education?

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review