New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Dr. Caroline Hoxby and
the Last Decade for Education Reform
Education/Nancy Salvato
September 16, 2005 - I’ve always enjoyed professors who could make their topic interesting and user friendly. They take a subject and discuss it in plain language that everyone can understand and they draw analogies so that students can better make sense of new information. In a good lecture, professors neatly summarize their ideas into a couple of talking points so that all the information that follows is organized logically. The best professors present their ideas in such a way that the listener has an epiphany and thinks, "Oh, now I see.”

Last evening at Chicago’s Heartland Institute, Dr. Caroline Hoxby proved herself a stellar professor as a key note speaker during the 21st anniversary dinner. She provided me with an epiphany. There are two reform movements which are taking place today in education. One is school accountability and the other is school choice. Experts are concerned with measuring results and parents are more holistic, concerned with the total learning environment. In good charter schools both of these concerns intersect producing the best results. It wasn’t until yesterday that I understood the unique role charter schools play because they must accommodate both movements.

In Dr. Hoxby’s study, The Impact of Charter Schools on Student Achievement, she investigated the impact on students lotteried-in or lotteried-out of the Chicago International Charter School. After only two years in the charter schools, students were 5-6 percentage points ahead (1/2 grade equivalent) of those who didn’t get lotteried-in. There have been similar results with voucher studies.

The evidence indicates that when regular public schools are forced to compete for students they produce better results. In 1998 in Milwaukee, vouchers expanded so that in some areas up to 95% of students could receive a voucher and choose another school (public or private). Knowing their students could leave, schools improved. Within three years, student scores improved 10-13 percentage points in math and science.

Vouchers and charters are a catalyst to improve curriculum, get back to basics, counsel poor performing teachers out of the system, reward teachers through contracts, and get rid of bad programs. In choice schools teacher contracts are more flexible and pay is based on student performance. It is hard to believe that charter schools enroll less than half the amount of home schooled children.

Charters and private schools are big innovators because they face pressure to perform and prove to parents that they are worth their tuition dollars. Charter schools are getting better over time. If they fail to perform, there is usually intervention. Bad charters close and that is important. They have led the pack in using technology to interact with parents. New Zealand, Australia, and the UK are especially interested in what charter schools are doing in this country.

Accountability generates information and makes the education market more professional and competitive. We can now estimate a teacher’s effect on student performance. New education management organizations with replicable school models allow parents the freedom to choose which model is best for their child.

Dr. Hoxby writes in, How School Choice Affects the Achievement of Public School Students, "There is obsessive interest in the question of "who wins” and "who loses” when choice is introduced. This obsession may turn out to be a mistaken application of energy. Choice need not make some students into losers and others into winners. It is at least possible that all students will be better off.”

Last evening Dr. Hoxby left her audience with the disturbing thought that this is the last decade to improve our education system and help our students to be able to compete with other students around the world for the best jobs. She presented evidence that suggests choice is the hybrid vehicle that will afford our students their last opportunity to compete on the world stage. And when the foremost expert on school choice makes a statement like that, the education community should all be sharing in this epiphany.

Related Reading:

The Impact of Charter Schools on Student Achievement
http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/hoxby/papers/hoxbyrockoff.pdf

How School Choice Affects the Achievement of Public School Students
http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/hoxby/papers/choice_sep01.pdf


Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review