New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Decreasing the Readiness Gap
Between Preschoolers
Education/Nancy Salvato
September 21, 2005 - There is a misguided movement throughout the country pushing for universal preschool and full day Kindergarten. The reasoning behind implementing such measures is to allegedly improve the school readiness of these pupils; however the evidence would suggest that there are no long term benefits to requiring this of our 3-5 year olds. "Without exception, little children are better off around their parents on a full time basis than they would be placed in early, formal public schooling.”

That being said, why do we have government funded early intervention programs such as Head Start? Who benefits from such a program? "Children from substandard or dysfunctional homes do better in early, formal public schooling.” It has been proven that, "Early, formal public schooling for other little children is "educationally insignificant.” Whether or not a disadvantaged child will benefit from Head Start comes down to the quality of that particular program.

Head start was developed to close the "readiness gap between Head Start children and their more advantaged peers when they enter Kindergarten.” But on balance, many children who go through the program still remain below the national average. This has been allowed to occur because of multibillion dollar financial abuses recently discovered in Head Start programs across the country.

What can be done about this? The Education & the Workforce Committee unanimously approved a bill authored by Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE) which would alleviate financial misuse of funds and improve the quality of the Head Start program. To begin with, the School Readiness Act would foster competition for grants within the Head Start system by requiring local operators to compete for funding unless they are a priority grantee. Grants could be terminated at any time during a five year grant cycle.

This "bill would strengthen Head Start’s academic standards by emphasizing cognitive development and the results of scientifically-based research in topics critical to children’s school readiness (including language, pre-reading, pre-mathematics, and English language acquisition).”  It would require Head Start operators provide documentation which proves they have hired well qualified financial personnel and that their administrative costs do not exceed 15 % of program costs. An annual report would have to be made available to the public and they would have to submit to an independent financial audit.

Head Start objectives would have to be aligned with state developed K-12 academic content standards. Organizations entrusted with federal Head Start funds would be required to demonstrate partnerships with local educational agencies and school districts. Head Start teachers must have adequately training; teachers will be required to have an associate’s degree in early childhood education or a related field and 50% of the teachers must earn a BA within three years.

Parents will be trained in skills to support their children’s educational development. Children in migrant or Indian Head Start programs must make sufficient progress in English language acquisition as well as other skills. There will be an increased emphasis on physical activity and healthy habits. Centers will be evaluated every three years on a child’s progress in key school readiness areas.

When it comes to doing what is right for their children, parents usually have their best interests at heart. But under certain circumstances, basic parenting skills may not be available for children who must rely on those who exhibit addictive behavior, may not have received substantial formal education, or where safety concerns can negatively affect basic care giving of children.

Barring exceptional circumstances, most parents have the wherewithal and skills necessary to prepare their children for formal schooling. But when basic needs are not met at home, programs such as Head Start can give a needed edge to disadvantaged youngsters. It is critical to pass the School Readiness Act to ensure that all children enter formal education with the necessary skills and preparation to succeed.

Related Reading:

Assessing Proposals for Preschool and Kindergarten: Essential Information for Parents, Taxpayers, and Policymakers
http://www.sjlpp.org/documents/proposals.pdf

School Readiness Act (H.R. 2123): Strengthening the Head Start Early Childhood Program http://edworkforce.house.gov/issues/109th/education/headstart/2123billsummary.htm


Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review