December 27, 2005
- Written in the text of "We the People: The Citizen
and the Constitution” is something I believe with my heart and soul,
"Freedom requires us to live as self-reliant individuals, to think for
ourselves, to solve our own problems, to cope with uncertainty and change,
and to assist and respect others.” Only if those living under the
protection of our Constitution understand this, can we maintain our way of
life. This requires an educated citizenry that understands the
responsibilities inherent in a "Democratic Republic.” The WTP authors make
it clear that the Founders believed that good "Citizens are made, not born.”
Unfortunately, our public school system is not nearly as concerned with
creating good citizens as with making sure that our students don’t hold any
prejudice for classmates with different values or lifestyles. Governor Jeb
Bush wrote about this in "Virtuous
Reality: Character-Building in the Information Age” when he said,
Virtues, grounded in universal moral absolutes,
represent standards of behavior that are fixed and firm in any civilized
society. Values, on the other hand, refer to a system of individualized
beliefs and preferences. Everyone has values -- even Nazis and street gangs.
Overemphasizing values accentuates our differences, so that the values of
self-expression and individualism now trump the virtues of deferred
gratification, responsibility, and commitment to family.
While public policy over the last three decades focused
more on recognizing the differences between groups of people and their
competing value systems, it did little in the way of reinforcing the common
bonds between all peoples -- the moral absolutes that transcend politics,
race, and gender. Virtues, and the moral imperatives implied by them, were
either lost in the debate or they were mischaracterized as values --
subjective and relative, personal, and specific to a particular person or
group.
The fact is the public school system is
not turning out good citizens. According to William Lind, who writes about
this in "What
is Political Correctness” one reason for this is the agenda of
"Political Correctness” or "Cultural Marxism” which seeks to achieve "a
society not merely of equal opportunity, but equal condition.”
This vision contradicts human nature, "because people are different, they
end up unequal, regardless of the starting point – society will not accord
with it unless forced. Political Correctness takes over freedom of speech,
press, and thought.”
"Political Correctness” has been helped along by the nation's
courts, which have gone too far in taking religion out of public life.
Recently Brit Hume hosted a show on FOX, "Religion in America: Church and
State." in which he exposes the myth of the wall of separation. Rather than
Supreme Court Justices citing as precedent the two clauses in the First
Amendment which protect freedom of religion (The "establishment” clause
prohibits the federal government from establishing one or more official
religions or churches for the nation. The "free exercise” clause prevents
the government from putting unreasonable restrictions on particular
religious practices.), our justices cite the wall of separation coined by
Thomas Jefferson in a letter written
to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802 to answer a letter from them
written in October 1801.
According to a Melinda, a blogger on "The
Stand To Reason”,
It was a Supreme Court case in 1947 that
introduced this phrase from a letter by Thomas Jefferson - "church and
state" - into the modern debate. And, in fact, it has framed the debate in
a way that many Constitutional lawyers describe as a complete reversal of
what the First Amendment means. Instead of making no law, giving no favors,
it has come to be used to discriminate against religion, they argue. The
Supreme Court decision extended the amendment to apply not only to the
Federal government but state governments, and claimed that the "wall" should
be high and impenetrable. This has become the precedent for the last 60
years.
The attack on Judeo/Christian influence been
demonstrated time and again in attacks on public displays of religious
symbols, the phrase "under God” in the pledge of allegiance, and by taking
public prayer out of school, etc.
It used to be that we began learning to be citizens in early childhood. We
learned to think for ourselves in our homes and in the classroom. In "We
the People” students learn that the founders acknowledged the value of
organized religion in promoting virtue. They believed that,
Virtuous behavior, which enabled people to control their passions, would
produce upright, responsible citizens. The founders recognized the
importance of education to good citizenship. For the American experiment in
republican self government to succeed, each of its citizens had to be
schooled in ideals and principles upon which that experiment was based.
Formal schooling together with a free press became a priority in the early
years of the new republic.
The federal government is charged with protecting our way of life.
Producing the text "We the People: The Citizen and the Constitution” is one
way for the federal government to help ensure that the public schools help
create civically minded citizens, not "Politically Correct” socialists who
depend on others to decide what they think, how they will take care of
themselves, and what laws we live by. While I don’t believe that the
federal government should be in the education business (nor the teacher’s
unions for that matter), the federal government has a responsibility to
ensure that we maintain our way of life and if this textbook is what my
federal tax dollars are going to support, then I am in full accordance with
this legitimate use of public money. |
