New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Nancy SalvatoThere Should Be Taxes on the GOP Platform
Nancy Salvato
August 27, 2004
History has proven that decreasing taxes works to improve the economy. In the 1920s, early 1960s, late l970s, and early l980s Congress enacted tax-rate reductions which spurred, on average, economic growth of 3 ˝ to 5 percent a year.

Reforming the tax code would also stimulate the economy. Filling out a standard 1040 form takes over 13 hours and itemizing adds 5 ˝ more. Time is money. Paying the accountants is money, too. The current tax code is a product of politics, not reasoning. The tax code is more than 17,000 pages with 700 forms.

One suggestion for reform is the flat tax which would tax all income at one flat rate of 17 percent. There would include an exemption to protect low-income workers. This would provide a significant restraint on government growth. Also, compliance costs could drop 94 percent.

Another suggestion is a national sales tax that would use the money collected to replace all of the revenue from:

• individual and corporate income tax
• transfer taxes (A tax on the transfer of assets by gift or by death),
• excise taxes (A tax on the manufacture, purchase, or sale of a good or service)

A 15 percent flat-rate tax would be assessed on retail sales of goods and services. There could be a rebate awarded to all households on their purchases up to the poverty level. Low income households would then be exempted from the tax and all taxpayers could purchase life necessities tax-free.

Extra relief could be provided to lower income working families by abolishing the payroll tax for Social Security and Medicare, in addition to income tax, and raising the NST rate accordingly. Eliminating the payroll tax would shift the tax burden onto more affluent taxpayers. The Social Security payroll tax is regressive. It is imposed on the first dollar earned and is capped--at $62,700 of income (in 1996). The Medicare portion of the tax is imposed on all wages and is not subject to a cap. If the payroll tax were also replaced with the NST, the new tax-inclusive rate would rise to 21 percent (in 1995) and the tax-exclusive, if the rebate is issued, rate to 27 percent (in 1995).

Several congressional caucuses are working on tax reforms which would help pave the way for the eventual implementation of a flat tax or national sales tax. The Universal IRA Caucus seeks to eliminate taxes on all savings. The Zero Capital Gains Tax Caucus wants to eliminate taxes on investments. The End the Death Tax Caucus wants to eliminate taxes that survivors pay on the deceased. The Full Business Expensing Caucus wants businesses to deduct the entire cost of depreciation at once. This would lessen their tax liability and encourage investment projects and discourage capital formation which results in lower labor productivity and higher prices for goods produced. The AMT Abolition Caucus wants to abolish the Alternative Minimum Tax, which penalizes individuals and corporations that have deductions deemed "too high" compared to their income.

President Bush has made headway on tax reform with temporary tax cuts on investments and on the Death Tax. He recently said that abolishing the U.S. income tax system and replacing it with a national sales tax was an idea worth considering. While pondering this idea, remember that a national sales tax could force the underground economy, such as drug dealers, to pay their "fair” share.

Implementing a flat tax or national sales tax should be an idea explored, not just considered, by delegates at the Republican National Convention. Overhauling the tax code needs to become part of President Bush’s second term agenda.

Let’s not see the RNC make the mistake of focusing on Kerry and all of his negative campaigning. Instead, the focus should be on the positive accomplishments of President Bush and how to continue the progress he’s made first term. Serious tax reform should be a major part of the platform.

Bush: Sales tax in, income tax out?
http://money.cnn.com/2004/08/11/news/economy/election_bush_tax.reut/

Does Paying Taxes Have to be So Complicated?
http://www.freedomworks.org/informed/issues_template.php?issue_id=938

Emancipating America from the Income Tax: How a National Sales Tax Would Work
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-272.html

Making the Flat Tax a Reality
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/guest/2004/rdm_0217.shtml

Time to Act on the Lessons of History
http://www.freedomworks.org/informed/issues_template.php?issue_id=1922


Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review