New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Nancy Salvato"Not Bush” for President
Nancy Salvato
May 31, 2004
In reality, George Bush is running for re-election against a candidate aptly named, "Not Bush” which doesn’t say a lot for his competition. I have to confess that every time I hear the name "John Kerry” I find it very difficult to take at all seriously the idea that he is the Democratic candidate for president in the 2004 election. The man has no original ideas and he waffles on everything. No, he is more of a silhouette used when there is no photo available of a person that is the focus of interest. But lest we forget, he is a Vietnam War hero!

John Kerry has proven to be of great value to George Bush’s opponents because of the amount of money available to him to defeat the presidential incumbent. Those who support Kerry seem to have done so out of default. There is no one else. Certainly he is the antithesis to Howard Dean, yet Dean has come over to his side and brought his base of support with him. This is purely out of self preservation. Dean’s days are over as a favored candidate for the oval office. The next best thing would be to curry favor in the Kerry administration. Yes, it’s that obvious, Howard. It’s best that you "hone” your talk show banter. You’ll probably need it.

"Not Bush” has no platform to speak of except to complain about everything that George Bush and the majority of the GOP have implemented in the past four years. To those students who like to complain about my classroom agenda, I have a standing reply. I tell them, I will only listen to your complaint if you have a better suggestion and can justify why you think you have a point. Honestly, I’ve yet to hear any workable agenda from the Democrats or justification for their incessant whining that is supposed to pass for a solution to everything that is wrong in this world.

The Democrats need to face reality. We are at war and we have not chosen this fight. We did not instigate this confrontation. We have responded to it with the only solution that will allow us to win. We have decided to give the terrorists a badly needed spanking. As politically incorrect as it may sound, sometimes "because I say so” or a swift slap on the behind is what needs to be heard or done.

Speaking of which, all of this "political correctness” has seriously hampered our ability to understand the reality of the situation. It used to be important to learn vocabulary because with a command of the English language a person could better communicate their meaning. Political Correctness has blurred the preciseness of everything and left room to spin meaning ad infinitum.

Bottom line: the terrorists simply can’t go around bullying people. They can be equated with the kids that extort other kids’ lunch money. Hello…! Telling the students to handle it instead of having the adults take charge doesn’t work. Anybody remember Lord of the Flies? Unfortunately, we must make use of our armed forces against those who would harm us because they don’t respond to idle threats. Something of substance has to be held over their heads. How many U.N. resolutions were there?

When the Democrats get their heads out of the clouds and realize how our country puts the food on the table, perhaps they’ll have more respect for George Bush’s ability to respond to the terrorist challenge to our way of life with power and substance. Perhaps they’ll come up with a feasible plan of their own. Meanwhile, I pray the public is aware enough not to allow themselves to be spun into electing "Not Bush” in office come November.

Nancy Salvato is a middle school teacher in Illinois and an independent contractor for Prism Educational Consulting. She is the Educational Liaison to IL Sen. Ray Soden and she works with national and local organizations furthering the cause of Civic Education. She is a columnist for American Daily, The Common Voice, GOP-USA, OpinionEditorials and The New Media Journal.us. Her writing has been recognized by the US Secretary of Education. She has been published in The Washington Times, The Washington Dispatch, Iconoclast, Free Republic Network & Townhall.com., as well as other nationally and internationally published media outlets.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review