New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Nancy SalvatoLiberalism is Jousting with Windmills
Nancy Salvato
May 21, 2004
"If we want to save the whales, we call the Democrats. If we want to save the world, we call the Republicans."
--Tom Adkins


It’s a common trait of every generation to wax nostalgia about the way things were. Just last week my husband and I were pouring over a website called Tick Tock Toys-Archives and Galleries, a cavalcade of images and ideas http://theimaginaryworld.com/page4.html. We were having a lot of fun remembering Libby’s Fruit Float, Wacky Packs, Space Food Sticks, Frito Bandito erasers, and…well, I could go on and on.

For us, the 1970’s was a good time to be a kid growing up. We could walk outside at any given moment and find other kids who wanted to play. We’d be out all summer digging in sandboxes, building forts, and playing Running Bases. We’d spend whole afternoons at the pool diving into the water, playing Marco Polo, and doing underwater handstands until we had to come up for air. Evenings would slip into darkness as we ran around playing Flashlight Tag. Our socializing was only interrupted by the ringing of the dinner bell, and after eating with the family we’d be right back with our friends riding bikes, shooting baskets, and playing Hide N Seek,

Who could have imagined that today’s kids would have to arrange play dates and join organized sports in order to get together and have fun? Who would have thought that short cuts would have to be abandoned because child molesters would have the right, sanctioned by our courts, to be our neighbors?

Our society is changing and not all of the changes are for the better. Don’t get me wrong, there have been amazing technological advances of which I am the first to take advantage, but I’m not talking about this kind of difference. In an article Common Sense vs Experts, the author, Walter Williams, raises some concerns with which I concur.

He points out that before "there were hoards of school administrators, consultants and educational research spending”…kids who graduated from high school had a much higher achievement level than today. There's one estimate that a 1947 high school diploma was equivalent to today's college degree.”1

He remembers, "Before experts like Dr. Spock told us not to spank kids, kids didn't curse, shoot and rape teachers or fellow students.” And he recalls that it was only "after allowing experts to handle sex education” that teen promiscuity became pervasive leading to "record rates of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.”2

Experts decided, "Criminals were really victims of poverty, discrimination and broken homes. Instead of punishing them "with incarceration and execution”, they suggested trying, "rehabilitation, group counseling, probation and parole.” Yet, "every category of crime skyrocketed.”3

Wardens with degrees in Social Work tried out their theories of how criminals should be handled. The result was, "more prison riots and more guards and prisoners assaulted and murdered. Prison rape and sodomy are rife.” Now some prisons issue condoms to inmates "as a means to fight the spread of venereal disease.” 4 Experts said it was unfair that welfare recipients could not have "luxuries" such as a telephone, television, car and vacations. Welfare workers monitored recipients, sometimes unannounced. If you could afford those things you didn't belong on welfare. Today, people are entitled to welfare and to have children they can't afford. There is no stigma attached to welfare. Welfare has become a way of life.5 Mr. Williams opines that, "Society was far more civilized before (experts) took over our schools, prisons, welfare programs, police departments and courts.” 6

Benjamin Disraeli, back in 1872, gave voice to the following idea. "The tone and tendency of liberalism...is to attack the institutions of the country under the name of reform and to make war on the manners and customs of the people under the pretext of progress”.7 This indicates that Disraeli was ahead of his time in understanding that "Political Correctness” (PC) would make a mockery of our values and conventions.

If our society could turn back time, we could stop "Political Correctness” at its roots before it could tear apart our culture. What would be the correct way to forge ahead?

First, we need our childhoods back. Childhood is especially important because when we’re young we use our imaginations and act out adult behaviors when we "play” different rolls or scenarios. This is critical to our development because we learn empathy and understanding. Adult ideas of right and wrong are reinforced when "playing by the rules” in our games. At some point we stop these games of "make believe” when we’re old enough to take responsibility for our actions. We use our knowledge and experience to take on our real roles in society and become grown ups.

Society needs rules of morality and civil conduct; we have to be able to trust and get along with one another. According to Steven Yates, these rules are being replaced by a type of fascism, "exemplified in political correctness”8 which is trying to control our thinking through propaganda, "euphemism, and Orwellian subterfuge. Intolerance becomes tolerance, ideological conformity becomes diversity or inclusiveness, and perversion becomes an alternative lifestyle choice.”9

Furthermore, Yates believes that, "Liberalism is the ideology most responsible for abandoning the rules that must be in place if a society is to survive in the long run.” The politics espoused by liberalists embrace the notion of entitlement and have destroyed education, undermined our military capabilities, infiltrated businesses, and became a major source of income for lawyers.10

He hits the nail on the head when he says that, "Entire generations can lose sight of what actually sustains their world if they grow up privileged and overprotected.”11 I know he’s right because I had a very comfortable upbringing. I had a good education. And I identified as a liberal when I was in college and old enough to vote. I wanted to save the world.

I was a liberal during my first marriage when I spent more money than I contributed to our joint income. I still wanted to save the world. But after a divorce, I realized that it was up to me to do the caretaking. I actually had to grow up and rely on my income from teaching to survive with any level of comfort.

Now I am a Conservative. In my job I’ve had to deal with PC in the school system and I see first hand how it doesn’t work. My eyes were opened to the "real world”. I still want to save it, but differently. As I grew older I discovered that liberalism is for those who never grow up. I completely agree with Yates that "liberalism really is an ideology of let’s pretend.”12

Liberals pretend that Gun control will make our streets safer; that Affirmative Action programs really help blacks by lowering standards, and don’t discriminate in reverse against white men; and that men and women are interchangeable in combat situations.13

When children pretend, no one is affected on a grand scale. This is when mistakes can be made and experimenting is appropriate. Grown ups need to think through the long term results of their actions before they act on them. Conservatives ask themselves how our lives will be affected in the long run before they sign ideas into law. They are not impulsive, thus the name Conservative.

Conservatives question popular notions. In the real world, are government schools better at raising civilized children than their parents? Shouldn’t we save the institution of family? When children become teenagers, should we give them condoms to protect them from pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases? Wouldn’t abstinence make more sense? Will AIDS be cured by more Federal funds? Wouldn’t monogamy be a better choice? Is a stable marriage between one man and one woman really just one of many options? What is the definition of marriage? Do women have a Constitutional right to kill their unborn babies if they become inconvenient? When does life begin? 14

The liberal politics which evolve from PC or Let’s Pretend are what will destroy our society. Conservatives realize we cannot continue to pretend anymore. We have to see things as they are. The survival of our society depends on understanding that morality is not subjective and personal. What is real is that we need to protect our Constitution and acknowledge that it is based on Judeo-Christian values. We need to take responsibility for our actions and ourselves. We need to behave with civility. We need to be Conservatives.

1-7 Doctrinaire Liberalism: The ideology of Let’s Pretend
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/yates7.html

8-14 Common Sense vs Experts
http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/commonsense.htm


Nancy Salvato is a middle school teacher in Illinois and an independent contractor for Prism Educational Consulting. She is the Educational Liaison to IL Sen. Ray Soden and she works with national and local organizations furthering the cause of Civic Education. She is a columnist for American Daily, The Common Voice, GOP-USA, OpinionEditorials and The New Media Journal.us. Her writing has been recognized by the US Secretary of Education. She has been published in The Washington Times, The Washington Dispatch, Iconoclast, Free Republic Network & Townhall.com., as well as other nationally and internationally published media outlets.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review