New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Nancy SalvatoKerry’s Game Remains the Same
Nancy Salvato
May 28, 2004
I remember in the early 1980’s when I was an undergraduate, there were a small number of students and faculty involved in an Organization on campus called LOSPES (I think the acronym stood for Loyola in Solidarity for the People of El Salvador). Those who belonged to this organization were against the Reagan administration’s policies toward Nicaragua and El Salvador. President Reagan wanted to defeat Soviet sponsored revolutionaries in the American hemisphere. His administration believed this was a threat to us because of our involvement in the Cold War against the spread of Communism and world dominance by the Soviet Union.

One of the faculty members involved in this organization was openly Socialist. Being young and easily influenced, I joined LOSPES for a brief period because I believed all that I was taught in the lectures given by these leftist faculty members with regards to U.S. foreign policy in Central America. I thought I was well versed in our government’s agenda.

During those LOSPES days, John Kerry was a leading opponent of President Reagan’s effort to squelch Soviet sponsored terrorism in Nicaragua through financing an anticommunist guerrilla army (Contras) to fight against the Sandinista National Liberation Front. "Kerry assailed Reagan’s anticommunist, pro-democracy policy as barbaric.”[1] He and Sen. Tom Harkin (D) went to Managua and held secret talks with Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega. He came back with a plan that didn’t include any dialogue with the unified democratic opposition. There was no commitment to national reconciliation.

Barry Goldwater (R) accused Kerry and Harkin of breaking the law by holding unauthorized negotiations with a foreign leader. Sens. Kennedy (D) and Byrd (D) praised Kerry and Harkin (no surprise). Kerry reminded everyone that he was a Vietnam veteran and was wounded in the conflict (what else is new?). [2]

It’s important to note that Secretary of State George Schultz admonished, "Just as the Vietnamese communists used progressive and nationalist slogans to conceal their intentions, the Nicaraguan communists employ the slogans of social reform, nationalism and democracy to obscure their totalitarian goals.”[3]

The House rejected aid for the Contras and the Sandinistas went to the U.S.S.R. for Soviet support. Kerry didn’t blame the Sandinistas for this development; he blamed Reagan for rejecting his alleged peace proposal. He said Reagan, "forced Ortega to look to the Soviets for help.”[4] That’s like saying that Bush started the war on terror rather than respond to the terrorist threat. Thank goodness we didn’t work through the United Nations; a corrupt organization who’s stalling tactics allowed Saddam to hide his weapons of mass destruction.

Kerry launched a campaign to discredit the Reagan administration and their support of the Contras. Evidence was based on information from a dead informant whom they never met. Hmm, that sounds familiar…kind of like the foreign support that Kerry claims during his current presidential campaign.

There were many allegations that Kerry’s staff bribed potential witnesses to testify against Contras. Kerry endorsed a group that included open supporters of the Sandinistas, the Cuban govt. of Fidel Castro, and FMLN guerillas of El Salvador. Kerry used Senate letterhead to praise this group and ask for help with their fundraising. This money was used to pay for the expenses of the disputed witnesses.

Kerry’s shenanigans faded to black in the face of the Iran-Contra scandal, when it was discovered that certain elements in the Reagan administration struck a deal to swap arms for hostages in Iran. During the investigation, "Bush accused Kerry of leaking unsubstantiated allegations that his office approved drugs-for-weapons deals to arm the contras.” [5] There was never any evidence to substantiate these claims, however, Kerry succeeded in muddying the reputations of a lot of people who couldn’t publicly testify to clear their names. Eventually, free elections were held in Nicaragua and the Sandinistas lost. The Communist insurgency in El Salvador collapsed.[6] Democracy triumphed.

Today, some of the players have changed but the game is the same. Now our enemy is Osama bin Laden and other terrorists. They want to achieve world dominance and we are their sworn enemies. There is a left wing element influencing the students in our major universities. The majority of professors in colleges across the country are registered Democrats. The National Education Association’s political committee has recommended Kerry’s endorsement for President.

Recently, students at The College of DuPage, a Midwestern college, made up of the Student leadership Committee; Campus Greens; Youth for Christ; Latino Ethnic Awareness Association; Newman Association; and Students for Democratic Foreign Policy, joined with the Faith based PEACE Coalition to call for an end to the war in Iraq and have a day of peace activities. Included in this was a screening of MoveOn.org’s (a liberal left 527 PAC which accepts money from George Soros who condones overthrowing sovereign governments) "Uncovered: the Whole Truth About the Iraq War,” and "Where We Stood; Chicago’s Resistance to the U.S. War In Iraq.”[7] It’s not LOSPES but the philosophy guiding their mission remains the same.

Kerry’s continued support for the United Nations (recently implicated in the oil for food scandal in Iraq) is reminiscent of his sympathy for Daniel Ortega. He still doesn’t understand when he is being hoodwinked by non-sympathetic organizations or dictators. Rather than put the security of our great nation first and foremost, he continues to allow those with their own best interests at heart to influence his decisions regarding the welfare of our country. His policies jeopardize the continued sovereignty of our country and our influence around the world.

John Kerry has been endorsed by the likes of Mahathir Mohamad and Hugo Chavez, yet the Democratic Party is trying very hard to paint him as a moderate.[8] John Kerry is a wannabe radical hiding in elitist clothing, still living in the 1960’s as evidenced by his comparison of all foreign policy to Vietnam.

6 Kerry and the Communists
www.aim.org/media_monitor_print/1390_0_2_0/

1-5 Kerry used enemy to win battle at home
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38529

8 National Review, Back in Sandinista Days pp.27-30
www.nationalreview.com

7 Weekend Edition Reporter/Progress Apr 30, May 1& 2 2004 p27
Peace Fair planned at COD


Nancy Salvato is a middle school teacher in Illinois and an independent contractor for Prism Educational Consulting. She is the Educational Liaison to IL Sen. Ray Soden and she works with national and local organizations furthering the cause of Civic Education. She is a columnist for American Daily, The Common Voice, GOP-USA, OpinionEditorials and The New Media Journal.us. Her writing has been recognized by the US Secretary of Education. She has been published in The Washington Times, The Washington Dispatch, Iconoclast, Free Republic Network & Townhall.com., as well as other nationally and internationally published media outlets.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review