Front Page           
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
American Fifth Column
Culture Wars             
Headlines                 
Analysis               
NMJ Radio          
NMJ TV               
Analysis Archive
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google


See blogs and businesses for USA
About Lee Culpepper
Lee Culpepper is a Marine turned high school English teacher. Currently, he is writing his first book, "Alone and Unafraid: One Marine's Counterattack Inside the Walls of Public Education."
Past Articles
Dreams of “Our” Cowboy

Lee Culpepper
Dreams of “Our” Cowboy
April 16, 2009

As he rides along rounding up his vision of an egalitarian world, the president appears inclined to marshal the atrophy of America’s Judeo-Christian foundation. President Obama seems to believe the government has the power to redefine morality—often through political correctness—and he may be bent with enough audacity to attempt wrangling the nation’s hope from God. The president has wasted no time trying to cover America’s identity with his new brand of old, liberal ideas. His statement in Turkey regarding what “we” consider America today is a revised version of what he whistled in 2007:

 

“Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation. At least not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, and a Buddhist nation, and a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers." (That’s six nations in case you were wondering.)

 

Last Monday, the president made some progress—the one way he seems most capable—through long-winded rhetoric. In his revised speech, the sharp-shooting speaker aimed to reunify the nation. Only a few months into his presidency and America is no longer the six Balkanized nations he declared two years ago. As of last Monday, “America is a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.” The president habitually orates in vague, sweeping statements—and while he made an abstract reference to our “founding documents,” he failed to explain the specific ideals and values that bind us.

 

What his teleprompters did make consistently clear, however, was his principal objective: Divorce America from Christianity. To accomplish this goal would certainly wound our “founding documents.” Separating America from its Judeo-Christian heritage would diminish the following principles of The Declaration of Independence: Belief in Creator; God created us; God gives absolute moral laws; God establishes governments; God’s providence; and God’s judgment day.

 

John Adams warned:

 

“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” 

 

President Obama boasts knowing something about the dangers of diluting values. In France he stated:

 

“I don't believe that there is a contradiction between our security and our values. And when you start sacrificing your values, when you lose yourself, then over the long term that will make you less secure.”

 

The president was patting himself on the back for his decision to close Guantanamo. But how does his own sacred argument not apply to the perils regarding his vigor to distance America from its Judeo-Christian roots? America once placed her hope and faith in God and individualism. Today our president asks us to put our hope and faith in the government and him.

 

Driven by an ambition to separate the nation from Christianity, he may continue to modify his assertion of what we consider ourselves. Though a professed Christian himself, the president preaches the ideology of political correctness. And political correctness serves only to blur the line between right and wrong as it censors and oppresses our God-given freedom to speak and to think. His administration’s euphemisms concerning the Islamic terrorists’ war against America are blazing examples of the role political correctness will serve in trying to censor truths regarding morality and immorality.

 

Senator Chuck Schumer stated just the other day that “traditional values are a thing of the past.” Now, with the bridle of morality and religion hanging on Congress’s fence post, President Obama is proving to be his own type of cowboy president.
Social Bookmarking
               

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The New Media Journal.us © 2010
A Division of BasicsProject.org