About Dr.
Elaina George, MD Dr. Elaina George is physician in
Atlanta, Georgia. She is a medical correspondent and a
Contributor
to various multi-media outlets. Dr. George is a Forensic
Consultant with American Medical Forensic Specialists. She is a
keynote speaker with the American Enterprise Institute's
speakers bureau and a medical correspondent for
YourBlackWorld.com.
Dr. Elaina George, MD
Healthcare Reform: The Law of Unintended
Consequences
October 13, 2009
The debate on healthcare reform is in full swing,
but no one is paying attention to the long term
effects.
I am for universal healthcare in theory. As a physician, I believe that
it is a fundamental right. Unfortunately, the way the debate and pending
legislation has been crafted, the outcome will result in unintended
consequences.
As a physician in solo practice, I am in a unique position to see the
outcome if we continue on the path that Congress is proposing in HR
3200.
1) A single payer system that pays the same rate as Medicare or as the
bill stipulates (5% above Medicare) will lead to LESS choice. People are
overlooking the fact that most private physicians are currently NOT
accepting new Medicare patients because they can’t afford to do so and
stay open. There will be no reason for this to change if the
reimbursement scale adopted.
Unintended consequence: The network of private physicians would be
smaller and more patients will be placed in a system of fewer
physicians, less choice and longer waiting times to be seen. This would
have the opposite effect – what is the point of universal healthcare if
you don’t have quality physicians to provide it.
2) The proposed healthcare bill sets up a bureaucracy run by a National
health insurance commissioner and sets up an insurance "self regulatory
agency” – made up of national insurers, national agencies, and insurance
producers. There are no physicians or patient advocates.
Unintended Consequences: This works on the same model of the commercial
insurance companies and is at the heart of what is intrinsically wrong
with the system because doctor recommended care and patient rights are
not represented.
3) Commercial insurance companies will follow the rules of the public
option plan in order to compete. They will use the reimbursement rates
as their guide and that would lead to providers leaving the system
thereby setting up a parallel system – and by default a two-tier system.
Those with money will simply opt out while those in the system will
likely be subject to more restrictions and longer waiting times for
their care.
The goal of private insurance companies is to increase profits while the
goal of the government is to save money, but the end result is the same.
There will be a limiting of access and a rationing of care. The
government will have no competition that can stop it from continuing to
lower the bar – in both reimbursements to providers and hospitals, and
covered services for patients.
Taken to its logical extension patient care will be driven by a faceless
government entity that runs healthcare on algorithms (e.g., how long it
should take to treat a sinus infection and what drugs should be used,
whether or not surgery will be allowed under the guise of evidence-based
medicine). The art of medicine will be lost along with the innovations
provided by physicians who are able to think outside of the box, and the
practice of medicine will be irreversibly changed. The best and the
brightest will choose any other profession that doesn’t sap their
spirit.
It is time to turn the debate to the real culprit in the rise in health
care costs. A private insurance industry that profits by excluding the
sickest and limits care for its members; a pharmaceutical industry that
reaps windfall profits by setting up pharmacy benefit management
middlemen who keep prices artificially high while driving the medical
formulary; and a hospital system that is charging astronomical prices
under the guise of recouping costs incurred by treating the uninsured,
when in fact they get money from the government to do just that.
We have the power to revamp our health care system by removing and
regulating those entities that profit from disease. This will require
the guts to stand up to the lobbyists and corporations and say that
there has to be a limit to their greed. It will also require the
American people to really take a hard look at the choices they make that
contribute to chronic disease such as smoking, leading sedentary
lifestyle and eating an unhealthy diet.