|
| |
|
|

This text will be replaced |
About
Frank Salvato
Frank Salvato is the Executive Director
and Director of Terrorism Research for
BasicsProject.org
a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education initiative. His
writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee
and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention. His organization,
BasicsProject.org, partnered in producing the original national symposium series
addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism. He is a member of the
International Analyst Network
and has been a featured guest on al Jazeera's
Listening Post.
He also serves as the managing editor for
The New Media Journal.
Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel, and is a
regular guest on talk radio including on The Captain's America Radio Show,
nationally syndicated by the Phoenix Broadcasting Network and on NetTalkWorld
Global Talk Radio catering to the US Armed Forces around the world. Mr. Salvato
is also heard weekly on The Roth Show with Dr. Laurie Roth syndicated nationally
on the USA Radio Network. His opinion-editorials have been published by The
American Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times & Human Events and are
syndicated nationally. He is a featured political writer for
EducationNews.org and is occasionally quoted in The
Federalist. Mr. Salvato is available for public speaking engagements. |
|
|
|
Social Bookmarking
|
Past Articles
The
Consequences of Park51: The Cordoba House
The
United States, 2010: A Rogue Government
Yes, Mr.
Obama, Words Do Matter
When
Justice Serves an Ideology Instead of a Nation
Holder’s
Justice Department Has a Racism Issue
The
President Is Not Due ‘His Due’
It
Should Be Our Honor to Honor
It
Simply Cannot Return to the Status Quo
We Have
to Talk About Elena Kagan
First, He Was a Community Organizer
Denying
Reality Brings Us Closer to Nuclear Midnight
Demonizing the Tea Party the Chicago Way
The
Constitutional Crisis Started Long Ago
‘I
Will Support and Defend the Constitution’
We
Simply Can’t Afford Another Entitlement Program
How
Quick the Message Fades
Tough
Medicine for Getting Back to Good
Our
Federal Government’s Basic Purpose
The Tea
Party Movement, The GOP & Making It Work
The
Time Is Ripe for Divide & Conquer
The
Janus Face of the Progressive Democrats
At This Point It’s About Defining the
"Win”
American
Liberty v. Obama’s Social Engineering
Is the
Constitution Just a Grand Suggestion?
Have
Dems Been Marginalized within Their Own Party
Confronting
the Spin on the Fort Hood Massacre
Pretending
to Speak for an Entire Culture
When
Ideology Masks Ignorance
It's Time
to Pay Close Attention to the Politicians
The Only
Real Strategy for Afghanistan
Why Obama
Will Throw ACORN Under the Bus
"Please,
God, No...It's So Hot, I'm Burning Up"
Missing the
Larger Point on the Public Option
Challenging
the Status Quo
You Say You
Want a Real Solution
'You Have
Awakened the Sleeping Giant'
"Birther"
Label Overshadows a Real Issue
Reading
Legislation...It’s Your Job!
A
Government Run by Mrs. Kravitz
Instituting
a Safeguard Against Political &...Tyranny
Amid All
the Celebrity Deaths, A Reality Check
When In The
Course of Human Events...
Genocide or
Massacre, US Repeating Mistakes...
The Path to
the Future Requires a Return to the Roots
With All
Things, Facts & Truth Matter
Gitmo,
Liberals, Politics & Deceit
Obama, Cheney & The Bright Shiny Thing
Nancy Pelosi: Damaged Beyond Repair
Radical Islam By Any Other Name...
Celebrating the Exit of a RINO, Cheering as Rome...
Specter: An Opportunist Guilty of Political Treason
A Week for the Earth; A Day for the Constitution
Left Is Making a Mistake in Ridiculing the Tea Parties
Obama’s European Tour: Arrogance, Ineptness &...
The Two-Faced Brutality of Hope & Change |
Frank Salvato,
Managing Editor
The Consequences of Park51: The Cordoba House
August 6, 2010
In light of the decision by the
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission to allow for the
construction of a mosque and Islamic center just 500 feet from Ground Zero,
it can be successfully argued that political correctness has replaced
history as a basis for knowledge in the United States of America. If it
holds true that history does repeat itself – and I have no reason to believe
it won’t – then the culture of ignorant arrogance, so prevalent in the
nation today, will prove to be a contributing factor to the subjugation of
the great American experiment.
To summarize, radical American Imam
Feisal Abdul Rauf, founder, CEO and Executive Director of Cordoba
Initiative, has won approval – and support from the self-deprecating
Progressives elected and appointed to office in New York City – to construct
a $100 million, 13-story Islamic center, including a mosque that would
accommodate up to 2,000, just 500 feet from Ground Zero. Abdul Rauf – who
after the slaughter of innocents on September 11, 2001, said, ""I wouldn't
say that the United States deserved what happened, but the United States
policies were an accessory to the crime that happened,” and who has refused
to recognize Hamas or Hezbollah as terrorist organizations – is refusing to
divulge the revenue sources for the project. Abdul Rauf’s wife, "Daisy”
Kahn, is quoted as saying of the construction of a mosque in the shadow of
2,976 souls, "No big deal.”
Aside from the fact that the Abdul Rauf’s insistence in building a mosque
500 feet from hallowed ground, consecrated by the massacre of almost 3,000
innocents by 19 Muslim barbarians, is, simply put, insensitive to every
other demographic but fundamentalist Islamists, self-deprecating
Progressives and the evil, it is callous, rude and ignorant. But most
importantly, it is antagonistic.
In order to understand just how deliberately abrasive the construction of
Park51 – or, as originally intended, The Cordoba House – in the shadow of
Ground Zero actually is, we must come to understand its inferred meaning and
to do that we must understand a period of violent Muslim aggression, circa
711AD, that established the Emirate and Caliphate of Cordoba. Remember, the
mosque project at Ground Zero was originally meant to be called "The
Cordoba House.”
History
In 711AD, during the first attempt at global conquest by Muslim leaders,
Tariq ibn-Ziyad, under the orders of the Umayyad Caliph Al-Walid I, brought
most of the Iberian Peninsula (what is now Spain, Portugal and Gibraltar)
under Muslim occupation in a campaign that lasted approximately seven years.
The Iberian Peninsula, for the most part, became part of the expanding
Umayyad Empire, under the name of al-Andalus.
The turning-point battle that brought the Muslims to power in Cordoba, the
Battle of Guadalete, was not a singular Muslim attack, rather, it was
the culminating event in a series of raids across the straits from North
Africa. During the initial raids, several southern Iberian towns,
predominantly Christian in nature, were pillaged by the Islamist forces,
which had been harassing the peninsula by sea since approximately 705AD. But
during the Battle of Guadalete, whole cities were razed and a grotesque
number of people were slaughtered in a general destruction that sent
non-Muslim civilians fleeing to the hill countries.
At first, al-Andalus was ruled by appointees of the Caliph, most holding
power for periods of approximately three years. But after a series of civil
wars between Muslim factions, exiled Umayyad prince Abd-ar-Rahman I
established himself as the
Emir of Córdoba. He refused to submit to the authority of the Abbasid
Caliph, who now held power, as forces under his control had butchered many
members of his family. Over a thirty year reign, he established a tenuous
rule over much of al-Andalus.
For the next century and a half, his descendants continued as emirs of
Córdoba, with nominal control over the rest of al-Andalus. Abd-al-Rahman
III, who came to power in 912AD, not only tightened his authoritative grip
on al-Andalus but extended it into western North Africa as well. In 929AD he
proclaimed himself Caliph, elevating the emirate to a prestigious position
competing with the Abbasid Caliph and the Shi'ite Caliph in Tunis—with whom
he was competing for control of North Africa.
Under the
Caliphate of Cordoba, non-Muslims were given the status of ahl al-dhimma
(or dhimmi, a non-Muslim subject of a sharia law state) and adults
paid a jizya (or tax). Then, as today, there were only three choices
afforded to dhimmis under sharia law: accept dhimmitude, pay
the jizya and exist as second-class citizens to all Muslims; convert to
Islam; or die.
And while apologists throughout history have tried to diminish the cruelty
of the Islamic culture toward non-Muslims in the many Caliphates, many
scholars have argued that it would have been both a "theological as well as
a logical absurdity" that Islam would have offered equality or even
pretended that it did. [Lewis, Bernard W (1984). The Jews of Islam,
p.4.]
Taking into consideration the history surrounding Cordoba where it relates
to Islam, the significance of the initial intention to name the Park51
project "The Cordoba House” cannot be ignored. Cordoba infers conquest. In
Abdul Rauf’s quest to erect an Islamic center and mosque in the shadow of
Ground Zero we can only be led to the conclusion that its existence would
signify conquest as well.
Rauf & Co.
In light of the history behind the name of Abdul Rauf’s organization –
the Cordoba Initiative – it is legitimate, and, in fact, necessary, to
scrutinize not only the intent behind his quest to build a monument to
Islamic conquest in the shadow of Ground Zero, but a moral obligation for
the non-Islamic world to inquire as to who and/or what organizations are
funding the construction of said monument.
For his part, Abdul Rauf says he wants to build the Islamic center and
mosque to promote interfaith understanding and tolerance, yet he has shown
little tolerance, understanding or sympathy for those who lost loved ones on
September 11, 2001; for Americans who watched their fellow citizens jump and
fall from the soon to collapse Twin Towers only to smash into the concrete
below; for the families of first responders who raced to their deaths if
only to save one life from the evils that radical Islamists perpetrated on
our country.
Truth be told, I suspect that Abdul Rauf, deep down inside, sees his Cordoba
House as a mark of conquest over America; a monument to the Islamist quest
for a global Caliphate. I suspect that Abdul Rauf, and all those who are
helping to fund his "initiative,” would dance with glee at the prospect of
the United States Constitution falling prey to sharia law. Of course, this
is my opinion, but I am familiar with the Abdul Rauf’s of the world and
there is nothing understanding, tolerant or inclusive about them. They are
arrogant elitists hell-bent on domination, and in this particular case, the
domination of a hallowed site by a monument to radical Islamist aggression
surrendered by the ignorant, the uninformed and those possessing a less than
noble agenda.
In 2008, at an event in Dallas, Texas, which, in-part, constituted the
original symposium series on the root causes of radical Islamist aggression,
co-produced by our organization,
BasicsProject.org, a young Islamist confronted one of our speakers,
Robert Spencer of
JihadWatch. I listened as he questioned Mr. Spencer and then again as
Mr. Spencer picked-apart his logic with facts, completely dismantling the
young Islamist’s argument. In the end, vanquished on the field of factual
and ideological battle, the young Islamist declared, "You will all live
under sharia before the end of your days.” This is exactly the mentality of
Abdul Rauf...that we will all live under sharia before the end of our days.
That is why it is obvious, at least to this observer, that his declaration
of interfaith understanding rings hollow and that his core intention in
constructing The Cordoba House within line-of-sight to Ground Zero is
intended to mark the location of a modern day Islamist conquest of "the
infidel.”
A Line in the Sand for So-Called Moderate Muslims
To his credit, Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a tireless campaigner for the
eradication of political Islam and the divorce of violence from the
religion, founder of the
American Islamic Forum for Democracy and a gentleman who has always been
cordial to me during our few encounters, strongly opposed the construction
of The Cordoba House at Ground Zero, saying:
"For us, a mosque was always a place to pray, to be together on
holidays—not a way to make an ostentatious architectural statement. Ground
zero shouldn’t be about promoting Islam. It’s the place where war was
declared on us as Americans.”
And
Hossein Kamaly, Fanny Brett de Bary Term Assistant Professor of Asian &
Middle Eastern Cultures at Barnard College, Columbia University,
said:
"After all, it was 19 Egyptian and Saudi Arabian thugs calling themselves
Muslims who perpetrated this heinous crime on September 11th. They want to
send a message of friendship, but building a mosque where there wasn't one
before, is not the most nuanced way of doing that.”
Sadly, these voices of reason are but muted whispers in a wind that
howls with the disingenuous voices of the politically correct who ignorantly
call for "tolerance” and "understanding” in the face of naked and violent
Islamist aggression. Certainly it cannot be denied that the overwhelming
majority – and, in fact, almost all – of violent aggression in the name of
religion today comes at the hands of Islamists executing their crimes
against humanity in the name of "Allah” and "Muhammad.”
And yet, so-called moderate Muslims across the United States and throughout
the world respond to outrages such as the construction of a mosque in the
shadow of Ground Zero with a deafening silence. So-called moderate Muslims
from around the world react to the horrors of terrorism perpetrated in the
name of their religion and through the hands of barbarians with grotesque
indifference. And, instead of taking the lead in expunging radical elements
from within their own religious community, instead of calling for a
reformation of the Islamic religion to exclude all violent, anti-Semitic and
dominant language in an effort to embrace the peaceful tenets of the Islamic
dogma, so-called moderate Muslims do nothing but hide behind the
disingenuous spin of organizations run by closeted fundamentalists like the
Council on American-Islamic Relations.
It is well past time that the so-called "moderate Muslims” step up to do
what they know deep down is correct. It’s time for them to choose sides and
live with their choices. Moderate Muslims either condemn the violence and
deceit, the subjugation of women and the crusade against all other religions
or they side with the aggressor jihadists in their quest for the
establishment of a global Caliphate; a quest to rule the world under sharia
law. From this day forward their silence must be interpreted as siding with
the aggressor Islamists.
There can be no turning back, no further delay. The grace period that began
on September 12, 2001, for non-Muslims to exercise understanding and
tolerance of the Islamic religion, to explore the meaning behind the
aggression, is over. The non-Muslim population of the world has been
intensely exposed to Islam for almost a decade now and that is long enough
for us to understand that in its current form – especially its current
fundamentalist form – Islam is not symbiotic with freedom or liberty, not
compatible with the 21st Century, and antithetical to the United States
Constitution.
We in the free world, who understand that liberty and freedom come to us as
inalienable rights from the Creator, will not acquiesce to an ideology that
oppresses its own women, that celebrates the conquest of other cultures, and
which is so indignant of other philosophies and ideologies that it would
allow for the use and rationalization of "violent jihad” in pursuit of
global subjugation.
There is no retreat from this moment in time, this "line in the sand,” as it
were. So-called moderate Muslims must choose: peaceful symbiotic
co-existence or a confrontation of cultures.
For those truly moderate Muslims who choose to demonstrate a desire to
co-exist in peace, standing against the "trophy mosque of conquest” – The
Cordoba House – would be an excellent opening gesture. |
|