New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google

This text will be replaced
About Frank Salvato
Frank Salvato is the Executive Director and Director of Terrorism Research for BasicsProject.org a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education initiative. His writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention. His organization, BasicsProject.org, partnered in producing the original national symposium series addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism. He is a member of the International Analyst Network. He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal. Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel, and is a regular guest on talk radio including on The Captain's America Radio Show, nationally syndicated by the Phoenix Broadcasting Network and on NetTalkWorld Global Talk Radio catering to the US Armed Forces around the world. Mr. Salvato is also heard weekly on The Roth Show with Dr. Laurie Roth syndicated nationally on the USA Radio Network. His opinion-editorials have been published by The American Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times & Human Events and are syndicated nationally. He is occasionally quoted in The Federalist. Mr. Salvato is available for public speaking engagements.

Social Bookmarking
Bookmark and Share

Past Articles
Denying Reality Brings Us Closer to Nuclear Midnight
Demonizing the Tea Party the Chicago Way
The Constitutional Crisis Started Long Ago
‘I Will Support and Defend the Constitution’
We Simply Can’t Afford Another Entitlement Program
How Quick the Message Fades
Tough Medicine for Getting Back to Good
Our Federal Government’s Basic Purpose
The Tea Party Movement, The GOP & Making It Work
The Time Is Ripe for Divide & Conquer
The Janus Face of the Progressive Democrats
At This Point It’s About Defining the "Win”
American Liberty v. Obama’s Social Engineering
Is the Constitution Just a Grand Suggestion?
Have Dems Been Marginalized within Their Own Party
Confronting the Spin on the Fort Hood Massacre
Pretending to Speak for an Entire Culture
When Ideology Masks Ignorance
It's Time to Pay Close Attention to the Politicians
The Only Real Strategy for Afghanistan
Why Obama Will Throw ACORN Under the Bus
"Please, God, No...It's So Hot, I'm Burning Up"
Missing the Larger Point on the Public Option
Challenging the Status Quo
You Say You Want a Real Solution
'You Have Awakened the Sleeping Giant'
"Birther" Label Overshadows a Real Issue
Reading Legislation...It’s Your Job!
A Government Run by Mrs. Kravitz
Instituting a Safeguard Against Political &...Tyranny
Amid All the Celebrity Deaths, A Reality Check
When In The Course of Human Events...
Genocide or Massacre, US Repeating Mistakes...
The Path to the Future Requires a Return to the Roots
With All Things, Facts & Truth Matter
Gitmo, Liberals, Politics & Deceit
Obama, Cheney & The Bright Shiny Thing
Nancy Pelosi: Damaged Beyond Repair
Radical Islam By Any Other Name...
Celebrating the Exit of a RINO, Cheering as Rome...
Specter: An Opportunist Guilty of Political Treason
A Week for the Earth; A Day for the Constitution
Left Is Making a Mistake in Ridiculing the Tea Parties
Obama’s European Tour: Arrogance, Ineptness &...
The Two-Faced Brutality of Hope & Change

Frank Salvato, Managing Editor

Denying Reality Brings Us Closer to Nuclear Midnight
April 16, 2010

There has been quite a bit of talk about nuclear terrorism as of late, thanks to the pseudo-summit hosted by President Obama regarding nuclear non-proliferation and the policing of weapons of mass destruction and nuclear weapons elements. I say pseudo-summit because although there was an "agreement” reached by each of the 47 countries in attendance, it was not binding and should not be misconstrued as any type of treaty. Still, shining the spotlight on unsecured nuclear material currently accessible by the black market is an important thing to do and in that respect I tip my hat to President Obama for his effort.

During the summit, President Obama stated:

"The single biggest threat to US security would be the possibility of a terrorist organization obtaining a nuclear weapon. This is something that could change the security landscape around the world for years to come."

Indeed, the thought of a terrorist produced nuclear event in an American city – or any major world city, for that matter – is nothing short of bone-chilling. Truth be told, a nuclear event in Manhattan would present a trophy for al Qaeda, Hezbollah or any number of militant radical Islamist terror groups , that would last generations. It is for this reason that Mr. Obama initiated the summit in the first place; to assure that terrorist organizations never attain nuclear capability.

This being the case, isn’t it odd that the Obama Administration continues to insist that "dialogue” is the only effective way to confront Iran on their nuclear ambitions? That the policy of extending the "unclenched fist” toward a nation such as Syria is the most promising avenue to prevent them from advancing nuclear materials to terrorist organizations? That sending financial aid to corrupt terrorist entities like Hamas in the Gaza, is the only true way to dissuade violent Palestinian extremists from attaining nuclear capability?

While participating in summits on how to best thwart nuclear proliferation may produce great sound-bytes for the media and good press for political campaigns, and while it may even produce well-intentioned, yet non-binding, agreements that commit each participant to championing non-proliferation, without honestly identifying offending nation states and non-state actors, this "commitment,” this non-binding agreement reached at the end of the summit means nothing.

Iran has never kept its word, either to the world community or to its own people. It is a brutally totalitarian regime that is committed to expanding the radically fundamentalist doctrine of Sharia Law globally. They oppress political descent to the point of murdering people in the streets. They silence the press. They torture and execute pro-democracy advocates, homosexuals, Christians, women’s rights advocates and any other demographic that the mullahs consider a threat to their reign.

And as the Obama Administration continues to insist that dialogue and sanctions will prove to be the demise for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the mullah’s quest for nuclear capability, and thus recognition as a nuclear power, we should not forget that the terrorist group Hezbollah is born of the Iranian Islamic Revolution; born of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps. This is important because Hezbollah, the radical Islamist group responsible for more American deaths by terrorism before September 11th, 2001, than any other terrorist organization, has gained a powerful hold in southern Lebanon, a territory greatly influenced by the heavy hand of the Syrian government.

The Syrian government, complicit, if not wholly responsible for the assassination of Lebanese Premier Rafiq Hariri, has been found to have advanced Scud missiles to Hezbollah in the south of Lebanon. Additionally, Hezbollah has threatened to use these missiles against Israel. Even further, Hezbollah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah has repeatedly threatened to strike at American interests around the world and in the United States itself.

If this weren’t enough, as the Obama Administration continues to marginalize Israel’s relationship with the United States on the one hand, they are greeting the leaders of Hamas – a State Department recognized terrorist organization – with open arms. The Obama Administration, along with the United Nations, continues to turn a blind eye to the truth that aid monies sent to the Gaza are routinely diverted for use by the jihadis within the ranks of Hamas for paramilitary and terrorist operations, and to enrich the elite amongst them (all political correctness aside, if all of the aid money sent to Gaza was actually used for the welfare of Gaza citizens they would be some of the wealthiest people in the Middle East). It would appear – and stunningly so – that for the Obama Administration, the only prerequisite for Hamas being deemed a "partner in peace” where the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is concerned, is that they try to refrain from launching too many rockets into Israeli urban centers. Let’s not mention that the Hamas charter calls for the elimination of the Jewish State.

The facts, as they present today, a sobering. We know that Iran has possession of highly-enriched uranium. We know that Hezbollah takes orders from the Iranian regime. We know that Syria and Iran have a very close relationship, with government officials making multiple and reciprocated trips to each other’s countries. We know that Iran is trying to facilitate an enjoined effort between Hamas and Hezbollah to affect Israel’s demise. And we know that none of the aforementioned can be trusted to adhere to international treaties, UN sanctions, or to even keep its word, both to the world community or to its own people.

Every law enforcement and intelligence director at the federal level in the United States has declared that it is not a matter of if a high-profile terrorist attack will again take place on American soil, but when and of what variety. Some have gone so far as to implicate the southern border of the United States as an embarkation point for terrorists and their weapons of choice.

Given that it has been established that Hezbollah, Hamas and al Qaeda have engaged South American drug cartels for product dissemination and money laundering purposes, it doesn’t take a Rhodes Scholar to figure out that there is a good probability the next terrorist event on US soil will involve a dirty bomb, a radical Islamist operative who has entered across the southern border of the United States and a major American city...or two...or three...or eight.

In light of this logic – as raw, honest and politically incorrect as it is – it would be intelligent – and perhaps even more importantly, honest – for the Obama Administration to jettison the ideological blinders about radical Islamist terrorism and the Nation States that support and abet them, and finally accept the truth that should Iran become a nuclear capable nation, so, too, would terrorist organizations become nuclear capable. And no pseudo-summit, non-binding agreement can change that.

It’s three minutes to midnight...do you know where your protection against terrorist inflicted nuclear Armageddon is?

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review