|
| |
|
|

This text will be replaced |
About
Frank Salvato
Frank Salvato
is
the Executive Director and Director of Terrorism Research for
BasicsProject.org
a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education
initiative. His writing has been recognized by the US House
International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for
Conflict Prevention. His organization, BasicsProject.org,
partnered in producing the original national symposium series
addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism. He is
a member of the
International Analyst Network.
He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal.
Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News
Channel, and is a regular guest on talk radio including on The
Captain's America Radio Show airing on AM1220 WSRQ and on the
Internet catering to the US Armed Forces around the world and on
The Roth Show with Dr. Laurie Roth syndicated nationally on the
USA Radio Network. His
opinion-editorials have been published by The American
Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times & Human Events and
are syndicated nationally. He is occasionally quoted in The
Federalist. Mr. Salvato is available for public speaking
engagements. |
|
|
|
Social Bookmarking
|
Past Articles
At This Point It’s About Defining the
"Win”
American
Liberty v. Obama’s Social Engineering
Is the
Constitution Just a Grand Suggestion?
Have
Dems Been Marginalized within Their Own Party
Confronting
the Spin on the Fort Hood Massacre
Pretending
to Speak for an Entire Culture
When
Ideology Masks Ignorance
It's Time
to Pay Close Attention to the Politicians
The Only
Real Strategy for Afghanistan
Why Obama
Will Throw ACORN Under the Bus
"Please,
God, No...It's So Hot, I'm Burning Up"
Missing the
Larger Point on the Public Option
Challenging
the Status Quo
You Say You
Want a Real Solution
'You Have
Awakened the Sleeping Giant'
"Birther"
Label Overshadows a Real Issue
Reading
Legislation...It’s Your Job!
A
Government Run by Mrs. Kravitz
Instituting
a Safeguard Against Political &...Tyranny
Amid All
the Celebrity Deaths, A Reality Check
When In The
Course of Human Events...
Genocide or
Massacre, US Repeating Mistakes...
The Path to
the Future Requires a Return to the Roots
With All
Things, Facts & Truth Matter
Gitmo,
Liberals, Politics & Deceit
Obama, Cheney & The Bright Shiny Thing
Nancy Pelosi: Damaged Beyond Repair
Radical Islam By Any Other Name...
Celebrating the Exit of a RINO, Cheering as Rome...
Specter: An Opportunist Guilty of Political Treason
A Week for the Earth; A Day for the Constitution
Left Is Making a Mistake in Ridiculing the Tea Parties
Obama’s European Tour: Arrogance, Ineptness &...
The Two-Faced Brutality of Hope & Change
The United States of America Is Not a Democracy
The ‘Give Obama a Chance’ Trial Period is Over
Recognizing the Reality of Radical Islam
‘Oh, God!’ It’s Bobby Jindal!
Determining the Intent of the Pres. Determination
It’s Not Obama’s "Stimulus” Bill
Time to Admit the Realities of Pakistan
Gaza & The One-World Media’s Propaganda
Illinois
Politics, Chicago Corruption...I Told You So
Barack
Obama: Neither Oblivious Nor Deceptive
Why the
POTUS Needs to Be a Natural-Born Citizen
A
Cornucopia of Gratitude
Giving
Marriage Back to the Church |
Frank Salvato,
Managing Editor
At This Point It’s About Defining the "Win”
December
18, 2009
Does anyone remember back to when the current healthcare reform
initiative began? What were the goals? What were the reasons for the
subject even being broached? Progressives and Democrats insisted
that the healthcare system was broken because there were millions of
people (figures varied, but averaged around 37 million) who were
uninsured and that those who had health insurance were subject to
continuously rising insurance premiums and diminished coverage. The
goal, Progressives and Democrats said, was to provide every American
with health insurance and lower healthcare costs for all...all by
the end of President Obama’s first term.
Today, as we approach the end of President Obama’s first term, the
House and Senate bills that are being presented to the American
people fail – miserably – to achieve these two basics goals.
Instead, they present as a wish list for special interest groups,
establish an unnecessary and additional government bureaucracy and
stand as testimony to the opportunistic ineptitude of today’s
Progressive controlled Democrat Party. The only saving grace is that
these bills will have to go through the reconciliation process
before they are presented to President Obama for his signature, at
which time the final product will become the law of the land...for
now, at least.
Interesting in all of this is how the target goals have changed.
One of the cornerstones of Progressive healthcare reform, as far
back as Hillarycare and as recently as the 2008 General Election,
was to provide healthcare – or more accurately, health insurance –
to each and every American, regardless of income demographic or
pre-existing condition. This critical element of the initiative
brought about debate and the eventual ruling out of a number of
ideas and one in particular; a government-run or government
administered public-option.
While Progressives and Democrats claimed a public option would
promote "honest competition,” lower health insurance premiums and
provide health insurance coverage for every American, Republicans
and Conservatives pointed out that a government-run public option
would put private sector for-profit health insurance companies out
of business and lead to a single-payer government-run healthcare
system (something
President Obama has stated he desires) that would inflict
rationed care and diminished service while bankrupting the United
States of America.
As it stands now, Senate Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has all but
abandoned the idea of a public option and, as a result, has all but
abandoned the goal of providing health insurance to every
American...as it stands now.
Then there was the goal of lowering health insurance premiums for
all Americans. Progressive political action organizations and
community organizers launched an unsuccessful campaign that tried to
smear the health insurance industry as "big greedy corporations” out
to gouge each and every American through ever-expanding health
insurance premiums while increasing their denial of coverage so as
to maximize profits, even as Grandma lay dying on the street. But
this scheme backfired on the Progressive spin doctors because it was
revealed that several organizations promoting this notion, including
the AARP, were to benefit from
selling "gap insurance” to the general public.
The goal of reducing the cost of health insurance suffered
additional damage when the Congressional Budget Office released
report after report indicating that the cost of health insurance
under the House and Senate bills would lead to higher premiums,
rationing and an increased federal debt burden. The
latest report to be offered came from the Office of the Actuary
for the Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services, which states:
"The national healthcare
reform proposals in ‘America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of
2009,’ would make far-reaching changes to the health sector,
including mandated coverage for most people, ‘pay or play’
requirements for most employers, expanded eligibility for Medicaid,
Federal premium subsidies for many individuals and families, and a
new system of health insurance exchanges for facilitating coverage.
Additional provisions would...increase federal income tax revenues
through a surcharge on high-income taxpayers.
"Total national health expenditures in the US during 2010-2019 would
increase by about 2.1 percent. The additional demand for health
services could be difficult to meet initially with existing health
provider resources and could lead to price increases, cost-shifting,
and/or changes in providers’ willingness to treat patients with
low-reimbursement health coverage.”
So, the notion of reducing
health insurance costs has all but been abandoned, thus
extinguishing any hope for the achievement of the second goal of the
Progressive/Democrat healthcare reform initiative.
Meanwhile, Republicans and Conservatives have all but been
locked-out of any meaningful discussion on the issue of reforming
the health insurance industry, even though their suggestions would
reduce costs, making it more affordable for Americans and US
employers to acquire and provide health insurance by:
▪
Eliminating the anti-trust exemption currently enjoyed by health
insurance companies;
▪
Eliminating the restrictions on purchasing and marketing health
insurance across state lines:
▪
Eliminating industry restrictions that lead to denial of coverage
for those with pre-existing conditions;
▪
Medical liability tort reform.
By implementing these common sense reforms and applying them to the
health insurance industry – and by mandating that any company
selling health insurance enter into a cooperative agreement to
provide health insurance to those below an established income
demographic in exchange for tax breaks – we really could lower
health insurance costs and provide health insurance coverage to each
and every American.
So, some questions beg to be asked:
▪
Why are Progressives and Democrats ignoring – for the most part –
sound common sense proposals that would result in the achievement of
their critical goals?
▪
If the critical goals presented at the outset of the healthcare
reform initiative are not going to be realized, why are Progressives
and Democrats insisting on moving forward with inferior legislation?
▪
What have their goals morphed into that they are so desperate to
pass anything titled healthcare reform?
Admittedly, I have absolutely no idea what the answers are to the
first two questions. Perhaps arrogance of power explains why
Progressives and Democrats are moving forward with legislation that
all but abandons what they set out to do. Arrogance of power would
explain quite a bit of what they do and don’t do.
But the answer to the third question is clear. The goal of
healthcare reform has morphed from providing health insurance to all
and lowering premiums for those who do have health insurance to
chalking up a "W” in the win column for President Obama and the
Democrat Party before the 2010 State of the Union Address. It
doesn’t matter that none of their critical goals have been achieved.
It doesn’t matter that the massive government take-over of the
healthcare system (one-sixth of the US economy) eluded Progressives.
What matters is crafting legislation so that President Obama and
congressional Democrats can say they achieved something –
anything – over the past year; since they achieved overwhelming
majority status in US government.
Healthcare reform has morphed from something noble, to something
grotesquely political. It’s all about spinning another failure into
a perceived "win.” And that’s pathetic. |
|