About
Frank Salvato Frank Salvatois
the Executive Director and Director of Terrorism Research for
BasicsProject.org
a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education
initiative. His writing has been recognized by the US House
International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for
Conflict Prevention. His organization, BasicsProject.org,
partnered in producing the original national symposium series
addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism. He is
a member of the International Analyst Network.
He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal.
Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News
Channel, and is a regular guest on talk radio including on The
Captain's America Radio Show airing on AM1220 WSRQ and on the
Internet catering to the US Armed Forces around the world and on
The Roth Show with Dr. Laurie Roth syndicated nationally on the
USA Radio Network. His
opinion-editorials have been published by The American
Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times & Human Events and
are syndicated nationally. He is occasionally quoted in The
Federalist. Mr. Salvato is available for public speaking
engagements.
The Path to the Future Requires a Return
to the Roots
June 19, 2009
As President
Obama thunders ahead with his liberal agenda, unencumbered by any
significant opposition in either chamber of Congress, the focus for the
Right has been on how to re-invent the Republican Party so as to be
competitive in the 2010 and 2012 election cycles. This renewed and
urgent focus is more akin to a meeting of rival mafia families, each
faction unwilling to cede influence, power, control or status to
another, than it is a quorum of individuals dedicated to true and
original Republican principles. In light of this it is appropriate to
revisit the founding platform of the party.
In the immediate aftermath of the inaugural
1856 Republican Convention in Jackson, Michigan (the party was
founded in Ripon, WI, in 1854), the Republican Party declared as their
founding platform commitments and allegiances to:
▪ The Charters of Freedom and States’ Rights
▪ An anti-slavery doctrine including support of the Missouri Compromise
▪ The Right to Bear Arms
▪ The right to a speedy and public trial by a jury of one’s peers
▪ Protection from unreasonable search and seizure
▪ Due process
▪ The First Amendment Right to Free Speech
Further, it was resolved that:
▪ Kansas be admitted as a state immediately with her Free Constitution
intact
▪ A railroad reaching the Pacific Ocean be completed by the federal
government
▪ Maintenance and improvements to the river ways and harbors be
conducted by the federal government
And finally:
"That we invite the affiliation and cooperation of the men of all
parties, however differing from us in other respects, in support of the
principles herein declared; and believing that the spirit of our
institutions as well as the Constitution of our country, guarantees
liberty of conscience and equality of rights among citizens, we oppose
all legislation impairing their security.”
In summary – and to paraphrase – the platform stood for protecting
the rights of individuals as outlined in the Charters of Freedom, the
right to unfettered government recourse and due process in the event
those rights were challenged. Further, it embraced only specific and
limited measures that would provide opportunity for individual
achievement and advancement. And lastly, it set forth a welcome mat for
men of all ideas and affiliations who "believe in the spirit of our
institution as well as the Constitution of our country.”
In other words, the original platform of the Republican Party was one of
protecting the rights of individuals so that they could advance their
individual beliefs and causes in society. What it did not establish was
a platform of positions on special interest issues and litmus tests for
those who would be put into nomination to lead the party, both in
government and organization.
Today’s Republican Party has abandoned these founding platform
commitments. Instead, today’s GOP finds itself naively acquiescing to
false challenges put forth by our political opponent parties; taking
concrete positions on special interest issues that divide the electorate
into two camps. The Republican leadership of today has fallen prey to a
political tactic that forces declared positions on special interest
issues. Because of this the party has become a haven for special
interest groups instead of being a pure political organization that
protects the fundamental rights of all Americans, including special
interest groups.
The Republican Party was created to protect the rights of the individual
to champion their own special interests, to affect their own societal
change. It is not the job of the party to advocate for those special
interests, it never was. "Republicans” who don’t understand this basic
principle don’t, then, understand the original tenets of the
organization. Further , those who insist on acquiescing to the false
challenge of special interest politics, those who have usurped the
original intent of the party to "change” or "augment” or "cast their own
mark” on the party are the ones who have destroyed the party. Just as it
is wrong for a Catholic to "sometimes disagree” with the doctrine of the
Church and include non-Christian ideology into what he "believes” being
a Catholic is all about (and I use the religious issue as an example,
not an issue) so too is it wrong for "Republicans” to "interpret” the
founding principles of the party. Party members either adhere to
original principles set forth by the party’s founders and framers or
they are not "real Republicans,” instead existing as a hybrid Republican
designated so buy the mire fact of the founding principles.
The only thing that has to be done to re-establish the good name and
brand of the GOP with the American people is to return to the original
1856 platform and expunge all special interest political declarations.
In doing so the GOP would leave the Democrats as the only political
party pigeonholing itself with declared special interest positions, thus
limiting its numbers to those who embrace their declared ideology. This
would leave the Republican Party free to cast the "big tent” it so
desperately needs to regain meaningful influence in government without
compromising on its core principles.
This isn’t to say that the issues represented by special interest groups
aren’t significant. They certainly are. But if the Republican Party –
and those who comprise its membership – truly believes in civic and
individual responsibility then it must leave social advocacy to the
individuals who comprise the party and private organizations, and not
mandate that the political party advocate for their individual causes.
Republicans (and Conservatives) have preached individualism in
responsibility and enterprise for far too long without putting their
commitments into practice. In that respect, they have come to embrace
the essence of what the Democrat Party is all about, collectivism and
the "it takes a village” Marxist philosophy of "group think.” It is now
time that they understand the reality of how to practice the philosophy
they have been preaching but not employing by liberating the political
party from the shackles of special interest politics while expending
their individual energies to advocate for societal change on special
interest issues.
The Republican Party was created 126 years before Ronald Reagan was
elected President of the United States. The principles used to forge the
party were employed in its creation before President Reagan’s father was
born. In light of these facts, we must stop lamenting about the Reagan
years (prosperous and successful though they were) and instead embrace
the roots of the party so that it may serve the people of the United
States – and the world – once again.
The Republican Party was created to be a political organization that
fights for the individual’s right to fight, no matter what one believes,
to paraphrase Voltaire. That’s what the original tenets embody and what
the party needs to mandate a return to.
If
Republicans really believe in individual responsibility then this needs
to be enough. If Republicans really believe in limited government, then
this needs to be enough. If Republicans believe in life, liberty, the
pursuit of happiness and the societal balance needed to achieve those
ideas for all the citizens regardless of their political identity, then
this needs to be enough. If Republicans can’t see the brilliance of the
organization’s founding tenets and their exclusion of special interest
politics and litmus tests then our party is lost. I only pray that we
haven’t become so intellectually stunted as to abandon our championship
of the individual; to civic and individual responsibility.