New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
About Frank Salvato
Frank Salvato is the Executive Director and Director of Terrorism Research for a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education initiative. His writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention. His organization,, partnered in producing the original national symposium series addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism. He is a member of the International Analyst Network. He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal. Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel, and is a regular guest on talk radio including on The Captain's America Radio Show airing on AM1220 WSRQ and on the Internet catering to the US Armed Forces around the world and on The Roth Show with Dr. Laurie Roth syndicated nationally on the USA Radio Network. His opinion-editorials have been published by The American Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times & Human Events and are syndicated nationally. He is occasionally quoted in The Federalist. Mr. Salvato is available for public speaking engagements.
Past Articles
The Path to the Future Requires a Return to the Roots
With All Things, Facts & Truth Matter
Gitmo, Liberals, Politics & Deceit
Obama, Cheney & The Bright Shiny Thing
Nancy Pelosi: Damaged Beyond Repair
Radical Islam By Any Other Name...
Celebrating the Exit of a RINO, Cheering as Rome...
Specter: An Opportunist Guilty of Political Treason
A Week for the Earth; A Day for the Constitution
Left Is Making a Mistake in Ridiculing the Tea Parties
Obama’s European Tour: Arrogance, Ineptness &...
The Two-Faced Brutality of Hope & Change
The United States of America Is Not a Democracy
The ‘Give Obama a Chance’ Trial Period is Over
Recognizing the Reality of Radical Islam
‘Oh, God!’ It’s Bobby Jindal!
Determining the Intent of the Pres. Determination
It’s Not Obama’s "Stimulus” Bill
Time to Admit the Realities of Pakistan
Gaza & The One-World Media’s Propaganda
Illinois Politics, Chicago Corruption...I Told You So
Barack Obama: Neither Oblivious Nor Deceptive
Why the POTUS Needs to Be a Natural-Born Citizen
A Cornucopia of Gratitude
Giving Marriage Back to the Church

Frank Salvato, Managing Editor

The Path to the Future Requires a Return to the Roots
June 19, 2009

As President Obama thunders ahead with his liberal agenda, unencumbered by any significant opposition in either chamber of Congress, the focus for the Right has been on how to re-invent the Republican Party so as to be competitive in the 2010 and 2012 election cycles. This renewed and urgent focus is more akin to a meeting of rival mafia families, each faction unwilling to cede influence, power, control or status to another, than it is a quorum of individuals dedicated to true and original Republican principles. In light of this it is appropriate to revisit the founding platform of the party.

In the immediate aftermath of the inaugural 1856 Republican Convention in Jackson, Michigan (the party was founded in Ripon, WI, in 1854), the Republican Party declared as their founding platform commitments and allegiances to:

▪ The Charters of Freedom and States’ Rights

▪ An anti-slavery doctrine including support of the Missouri Compromise

▪ The Right to Bear Arms

▪ The right to a speedy and public trial by a jury of one’s peers

▪ Protection from unreasonable search and seizure

▪ Due process

▪ The First Amendment Right to Free Speech

Further, it was resolved that:

▪ Kansas be admitted as a state immediately with her Free Constitution intact

▪ A railroad reaching the Pacific Ocean be completed by the federal government

▪ Maintenance and improvements to the river ways and harbors be conducted by the federal government

And finally:

"That we invite the affiliation and cooperation of the men of all parties, however differing from us in other respects, in support of the principles herein declared; and believing that the spirit of our institutions as well as the Constitution of our country, guarantees liberty of conscience and equality of rights among citizens, we oppose all legislation impairing their security.”

In summary – and to paraphrase – the platform stood for protecting the rights of individuals as outlined in the Charters of Freedom, the right to unfettered government recourse and due process in the event those rights were challenged. Further, it embraced only specific and limited measures that would provide opportunity for individual achievement and advancement. And lastly, it set forth a welcome mat for men of all ideas and affiliations who "believe in the spirit of our institution as well as the Constitution of our country.”

In other words, the original platform of the Republican Party was one of protecting the rights of individuals so that they could advance their individual beliefs and causes in society. What it did not establish was a platform of positions on special interest issues and litmus tests for those who would be put into nomination to lead the party, both in government and organization.

Today’s Republican Party has abandoned these founding platform commitments. Instead, today’s GOP finds itself naively acquiescing to false challenges put forth by our political opponent parties; taking concrete positions on special interest issues that divide the electorate into two camps. The Republican leadership of today has fallen prey to a political tactic that forces declared positions on special interest issues. Because of this the party has become a haven for special interest groups instead of being a pure political organization that protects the fundamental rights of all Americans, including special interest groups.

The Republican Party was created to protect the rights of the individual to champion their own special interests, to affect their own societal change. It is not the job of the party to advocate for those special interests, it never was. "Republicans” who don’t understand this basic principle don’t, then, understand the original tenets of the organization. Further , those who insist on acquiescing to the false challenge of special interest politics, those who have usurped the original intent of the party to "change” or "augment” or "cast their own mark” on the party are the ones who have destroyed the party. Just as it is wrong for a Catholic to "sometimes disagree” with the doctrine of the Church and include non-Christian ideology into what he "believes” being a Catholic is all about (and I use the religious issue as an example, not an issue) so too is it wrong for "Republicans” to "interpret” the founding principles of the party. Party members either adhere to original principles set forth by the party’s founders and framers or they are not "real Republicans,” instead existing as a hybrid Republican designated so buy the mire fact of the founding principles.

The only thing that has to be done to re-establish the good name and brand of the GOP with the American people is to return to the original 1856 platform and expunge all special interest political declarations. In doing so the GOP would leave the Democrats as the only political party pigeonholing itself with declared special interest positions, thus limiting its numbers to those who embrace their declared ideology. This would leave the Republican Party free to cast the "big tent” it so desperately needs to regain meaningful influence in government without compromising on its core principles.

This isn’t to say that the issues represented by special interest groups aren’t significant. They certainly are. But if the Republican Party – and those who comprise its membership – truly believes in civic and individual responsibility then it must leave social advocacy to the individuals who comprise the party and private organizations, and not mandate that the political party advocate for their individual causes.

Republicans (and Conservatives) have preached individualism in responsibility and enterprise for far too long without putting their commitments into practice. In that respect, they have come to embrace the essence of what the Democrat Party is all about, collectivism and the "it takes a village” Marxist philosophy of "group think.” It is now time that they understand the reality of how to practice the philosophy they have been preaching but not employing by liberating the political party from the shackles of special interest politics while expending their individual energies to advocate for societal change on special interest issues.

The Republican Party was created 126 years before Ronald Reagan was elected President of the United States. The principles used to forge the party were employed in its creation before President Reagan’s father was born. In light of these facts, we must stop lamenting about the Reagan years (prosperous and successful though they were) and instead embrace the roots of the party so that it may serve the people of the United States – and the world – once again.

The Republican Party was created to be a political organization that fights for the individual’s right to fight, no matter what one believes, to paraphrase Voltaire. That’s what the original tenets embody and what the party needs to mandate a return to.

If Republicans really believe in individual responsibility then this needs to be enough. If Republicans really believe in limited government, then this needs to be enough. If Republicans believe in life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness and the societal balance needed to achieve those ideas for all the citizens regardless of their political identity, then this needs to be enough. If Republicans can’t see the brilliance of the organization’s founding tenets and their exclusion of special interest politics and litmus tests then our party is lost. I only pray that we haven’t become so intellectually stunted as to abandon our championship of the individual; to civic and individual responsibility.

Social Bookmarking

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal,, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media © 2011
A Division of

Dreamhost Review