Recent Articles
How Many Rights Are Democrats Willing to
Forfeit?
It’s Official...James Baker Has Lost His Mind
Lecturing Europe While Accepting...Brutality
Loyalty to Self Over Country
Once Again, It’s About Associations and Judgment
Click
here for more articles by Frank Salvato
Click here for most recent article
About
Frank Salvato
Frank Salvato is the Executive Director and Director of
Terrorism Research for
BasicsProject.org a non-profit,
non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education initiative. His
writing has been recognized by the US House International
Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict
Prevention. His organization partnered in producing the original
national symposium series addressing the root causes of radical
Islamist terrorism. He serves as the managing editor for The New
Media Journal. Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor
on FOX News Channel and is a regular guest on talk radio
including on The Right Balance with Greg Allen on the Accent
Radio Network and on The Captain's America Radio Show catering
to the US Armed Forces around the world. His opinion-editorials
have been published by The American Enterprise Institute, The
Washington Times & Human Events and are syndicated nationally.
He is occasionally quoted in The Federalist. Mr. Salvato is
available for public speaking engagements.
Click here to email
Frank Salvato |
|
 |

Frank Salvato
Managing Editor
Lecturing Europe While
Accepting the Social Structure of Brutality
July 25, 2008
New York Times columnist David
Brooks recently wrote, "The reason we have a democracy is that no one
side is right all the time. The only people who are dangerous are those
who can’t admit, even to themselves, that obvious fact.” Aside from the
glaring error in his declaration that we live in a democracy (the United
States is actually a Democratic Republic, not a democracy) his assertion
is spot on. In light of the logic in Mr. Brook’s statement, it would
seem that the woman slated to be Barack Obama’s "Muslim liaison” is
dangerous, especially to women.
While Barack Obama was lecturing tens of thousands of Germans during his
"fact-finding tour” – interesting that he declared he was going to the
Middle East and Europe to "listen” and ends up pontificating – his
campaign
created the position of "Muslim Liaison;” a position meant to serve
as a conduit between his campaign and the Muslim community. Presumably,
this position was created because his campaign realized that their
Islamophobia (he has yet to address a Muslim forum or talk at a Mosque)
was incredibly hypocritical and served to disenfranchise and
discriminate against the American-Muslim community.
The likely candidate for this position is Hiam Nawas, a
Jordanian-American who served in
a similar capacity for the ill-fated 2004 presidential campaign of
aspiring politician Wesley Clark (interestingly, for someone who served
in a recent presidential campaign the Internet is stunningly devoid of
any substantial biographical information on Ms. Nawas).
One of the things we do know about Ms. Nawas is that she has a fairly
nonchalant and cavalier attitude regarding the plight of women in the
Islamic culture.
In 2005, Nawas wrote that the Bush Administration should "nuance” its
approach toward addressing the cruelty and barbarity women face in the
Islamic culture:
"We need to recognize that the social structure in the Muslim world
is very different from America's...American women need to understand
that what is best for them is not necessarily what is best for Muslim
women. Advocacy of women’s rights in the Muslim world must show
sensitivity to local political realities."
Anyone who has spent even the smallest amount of time researching the
plight of women in Islamic society should be stunned, not only by the
depth of Nawas’ appeasement to the totalitarian and despotic attitudes
toward women in Islamic society, but for the fact that a presidential
candidate would be so callow as to find someone – let alone a woman –
possessing Nawas’ attitude acceptable to serve as a liaison to any
plurality.
As I outlined in a prior article,
Women in Islam: Suffering the Barbary of an Ideology, the
treatment of women in Islamic society can only be defined as barbaric.
While there are some locations throughout the Muslim World that are
making strides toward rectifying this situation – Saudi Arabia is
allowing women to drive now – this is overwhelmingly the exception
rather than the rule.
It is a verifiable and undeniable fact that women in the fundamentalist
Islamic world are relegated to the status of possessions. Women are
routinely sold into arranged marriages by their fathers who receive a
dowry for the "sale”; the dowry sometimes issued in the form of goats or
other forms of livestock. The practice of polygamy is widespread
throughout the Middle East. In countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia,
Egypt and Pakistan, to name but a few, women are subjected to despotic
cultural edicts where "offenses,” ranging from un-Islamic dress to being
"in the presence” of an unrelated male, are punished – justified under
Sharia Law – by whippings, beatings, stoning and death sentences. Honor
killings occur frequently and Islamic society accepts it with no form of
recourse, no justice for the victim.
And while Ms. Nawas is readying herself to espouse her indifference to
the plight of Muslim women in the name of Barack Obama’s candidacy, she
does so intimating that the problem of Islamic cultural inequity toward
women is a malady removed from American soil. This notion is a falsehood
of the highest order. Honor killings are taking place right here on
American soil.
Sarah and Amina Said, 17 and 18 respectively, were murdered by their
father
Yaser Said in Dallas, Texas, in February of 2008 because he felt
Western culture was corrupting the chastity of his daughters. He is
currently at large. Law enforcement believes he is being harbored by the
Islamic community in North Texas.
In Atlanta, Georgia,
Chaudhry Rashad, admitted to strangling his 25-year old daughter,
Sandela, saying he killed his daughter as a matter of honor, because he
felt her plans for divorce would have disgraced the family.
In Henrietta, New York,
Waheed Allah Mohammad stabbed his 19-year old sister, Fauzia, to
death because she was going to clubs, wearing immodest clothing and
planning to leave her family for a new life in New York City.
A superficial search of the term "honor killing” on the Internet results
in 2,440,000 entries, so it is impossible to say that the issue is
outside the mainstream.
While the instances of honor killings here in the United States are
being prosecuted the fact remains that women are considered and treated
as possessions in the Islamic culture, whether here in the US or abroad,
to the extent of being murdered. Meanwhile, Ms. Nawas says we need to
"show sensitivity to local political realities.” Muslim women are dying,
both overseas and on American soil, and Ms. Nawas believes we should
"nuance our approach” so as not to offend those maintaining the despotic
culture.
As Barack Obama finished his "fact-finding tour” speech (really, who
goes on a fact-finding trip and has the audacity to stage a speech for
tens of thousands)
he proclaimed:
"This is the moment we must help answer the call for a new dawn in
the Middle East."
It would seem that Barack Obama’s idea of a "new dawn” for women trapped
in the Islamic culture – in light of his pick for liaison to the Muslim
community – is one that includes a "nuanced approach” to the brutality
the Islamic culture inflicts on women each and every day. I’m sure
tossing them that bone will win him votes...cast right before they find
themselves in pools of their own blood for having had the audacity to
vote; for having had the "audacity of hope.”