The United States
and governments of the West must use every means available to combat
Islamofascist aggression and expansion, both here in the West and in the
Middle East. One of the most critical aspects in the war against
Islamofascism is the war of ideas. This aspect represents the battle
between the Wahhabi, Salafist and radical factions of the Sunni and
Shi’ite sects of Islam and the ideology of inalienable rights as
embraced by Western Civilization.
If we in the West
are to neutralize the aggressive Islamofascist threat to our way of life
we must engage in the war of ideas; we must engage in a campaign of
disseminating accurate and honest information about the Western culture
to those who least understand our way of life, circumventing those who
spread propaganda.
There are several
avenues exploited by Islamofascists in the proliferation of the
extremist ideology, chief among them is the madrasah. Although the
literal translation of madrasah is "school,” for our purposes we will
focus on the madrasahs that engage in the teaching of the Islamic
religious dogma.
A typical madrasah
usually offers two courses of study: a hifz course (the
memorization of the Quran) and an 'alim course leading the
candidate to become an accepted scholar in the community. A regular
curriculum includes courses in Arabic, Quranic interpretation (Tafsir),
Islamic law (Shariah), recorded sayings and deeds of the Prophet
Muhammad (Hadith), logic (Mantiq), and Muslim history.
In a great many
madrasahs throughout the world – most notably Pakistan, Iran, Egypt and
Saudi Arabia – the teachings have a militant and agenda-driven bent and
include ideological and political indoctrination, a constituent of which
is promulgating hatred against the West and Western Civilization.
Another avenue for
indoctrination and the dissemination of radical thought are mosques,
both throughout the Middle East and in the West. Although traditionally
a place of worship for those of the Islamic faith, mosques have become
the centralizing entity for local Islamic communities.
In the 1980s, the
Saudi Arabian government began to finance the construction of mosques in
countries around the world. An estimated $45 billion has been spent by
the Saudis to finance the building and operational costs of mosques and
Islamic schools in foreign countries, including in North America.
Through the funding
of mosques and their operations Saudi Arabia is able to export their
Wahhabi, or Salifist ideology. In mosques financed by the Saudis it is
not unusual to find that the presiding cleric and doctrine have been
vetted by the Muslim Brotherhood.
One mosque used to
radicalize and indoctrinate members into jihadi organizations is the al
Farooq Mosque in Brooklyn, New York. This mosque helped to funnel
millions of dollars to al Qaeda and was a frequent place of worship for
many radicalized Muslims including those who bombed the World Trade
Center in 1993 and several of the hijackers that eventually brought down
the World Trade Center in 2001.
In the war of ideas,
perhaps the most effective method used by radical Islamists and jihadi
organizations to disseminate their propaganda and ideology is the media,
both in the Middle East in the form of al Jazeera, al Manar and al
Arabia and to a lesser extent in the West through the agendized
mainstream media.
To see some of the
extremist propaganda disseminated by Middle Eastern news agencies and
corporations one need only to logon to
MEMRI.org. This
organization is dedicated to translating the media publications and
broadcasts of the Middle East into English. Some of the writings and
programs illustrate the blatant indoctrination techniques used –
especially with Arab children – by those dedicated to spreading hatred
of the West and the United States in particular.
In the United
States, the mainstream media has become so agendized that the practice
of editorializing news items has become common place, so much so that
the practice is being taught in our schools of journalism.
Recent Pew Research
Center studies have proven time and time again that mainstream media in
the West – and in the United States in particular – are so politically
and ideologically slanted that a clear and untainted reporting of the
news is almost impossible to attain.
Further, Internet
information aggregators, such as Google and Yahoo!, have been
manipulating search results and search result placements. In China, for
example, Google and Yahoo! censor search results to exclude non
government friendly websites promoting democracy and Western ideology.
Recently, Google has
been disqualifying news and commentary websites critical of radical
Islam from their Google News aggregator. Although this is a blatant
manipulation of unfettered access to accurate, substantiated information
on one of the most critical topics of our times, because they are not a
government entity, because they are from the private sector, they are
not bound by the First Amendment political free speech constitutional
mandate.
Possible legal
action on behalf of those being censored by Google is currently being
considered by the Thomas Moore Law Center.
Finally, but
certainly not because of their lack of potency, are the so-called
Islamic civil rights organizations here in the United States.
One such
organization is the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR
is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial
currently underway in Dallas, Texas, and is directly affiliated with the
Hamas terrorist organization. CAIR is actively engaged in a propaganda
campaign aimed at pacifying the concerns of our government, its law
enforcement agencies and the American people.
One of the main
allegations against CAIR is that it attempts to suppress criticism of
Islamic terrorism and intolerance through accusations of racism and
anti-Muslim bias. CAIR is aggressively waging a campaign of what is
being termed "litigation jihad” against anyone and everyone who dares to
question the motives of those affiliated with radical Islamist activity
or Islamofascist organizations. A primary source for their legal
abilities comes in the form of financial aid from the Saudi government.
CAIR Chairman Emeritus, Omaer Ahmad, once said, "Islam
isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant,
that the Koran should be the highest authority in America, and that
Islam should be the only accepted religion on Earth.”
But the most startling revelation concerning our struggle
against aggressive Islamofascism is that the United States is not
engaged in the war of ideas. There hasn’t been one initiative or
program developed to engage the ideological forces of radical Islam. Our
enemy in the global war against radical Islam stands unopposed on the
ideological battlefield.
Recently, Sen. Joe
Lieberman (I-CT) queried senior US intelligence and security officials
on what was being done by our government to counter the radical jihadist
ideology both domestically and internationally.
FBI Director Robert
S. Mueller III responded that the FBI has no counter-ideology response
other than its "outreach" to Muslim-American communities so they
"understand the FBI." This "outreach program” explains the
inner-workings of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and little else.
Asked if the FBI had
a responsibility to wage a war of ideas, Mueller responded, "You put
that where I would say no, that it would not be our responsibility, for
any religion, to engage in the war of ideas."
The FBI's
responsibility, he said, is "to explain that once one goes over the line
and it becomes not a war of ideas but a criminal offense, this is what
you can expect, and to elicit the support of those in whatever religious
community to assist us in assuring that those who cross that line are
appropriately investigated and convicted."
Retired Vice Admiral
Scott Redd, head of the National Counterterrorism Center who has a
strategic operational role in countering terrorism, said one of the
"four pillars" of the US war strategy is the "war of ideas," but he
noted that there is no "home office" for that effort in the United
States.
Retired Vice Admiral
Mike McConnell, Director of National Intelligence, said the intelligence
community does not engage in any battle of ideas against domestically
located terrorists or their support nexus unless there is a foreign
connection.
Homeland Security
Secretary Michael Chertoff said nothing is being done domestically to
battle Islamist extremist ideas. The DHS Incident Management Team, he
said, is focused on civil rights or civil liberties — not fighting
terrorists' ideology.
In summary, the
United States of America is not engaged in the war of ideas in any way,
shape or form anywhere in the world including on our own soil. In
contrast, the enemy is fully engaged and succeeding in their mission.