|
With the Abramoff scandal prompting
Democrats to charge that the Republicans in Washington are mired in a
culture of corruption it is perhaps the wisest of the left who remain
silent, passively condoning the ultra-partisan activities of their
leadership. There are good reasons for many elected officials on the left to
choose to remain silent. One of those reasons is that one never knows when
something from the past is lurking in wait. One of those elected officials
from the Democratic side of the aisle is the junior Senator from New York
and former First Lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
That Clinton is positioning for a run at
the White House is a given. Her re-election to the Senate is almost a lock.
She has made such an obvious attempt at moving to the center – and in
concert with her husband, the ex-president, making statements that track him
moving more to the “progressive” left each time he opens his mouth – that it
would be surprising if she hasn’t already received a solicitation letter
from the Republican National Committee.
Senator Clinton’s position is furthered
along by the fact that she has been involved in so many scandals, both legal
and political, that any mention of impropriety or misconduct – especially in
light of the indictment of Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) and
the resignation of Randal “Duke” Cunningham (R-CA) – is viewed with a yawn
and a, “So What? That’s politics in Washington, isn’t it?” Hillary Clinton
has proven to be her party’s version of “the Teflon politician.”
Certainly each administration has the
opportunity, and the discretionary right for that matter, to hire, place and
promote those that they deem valuable to any given government entity over
which they have administrative authority. Many times these appointments and
promotions are executed as “rewards” for hard work during a political
campaign or for loyalty. Although such appointments are viewed as lacking
ethics and often times scrutinized by the mainstream media it is a reality
that only the naïve, those blinded by the purity of their ideology and the
politically partisan can deny.
It can be supposed, then, that the eight
years of the Clinton Administration allowed for time to effectively create a
legion of Clinton appointees who would be placed throughout the various
federal government agencies and departments. No doubt many of these
appointments were warranted by the merits of the individual. But where the
appointee’s job performance would ferret out those appointed without the
appropriate job skills, there is no filter, no safeguard to detect those
whose appointments were based exclusively on political loyalty, whether to a
political party or an individual politician.
Read more...
The
Fraudulent Senator...
The seven part series by Joan Swirsky,
Justin Darr,
A.J. DiCintio, Noel Sheppard & Frank Salvato that examines the 2000
senatorial campaign of Hillary Rodham Clinton, is now available in
paperback at
Lulu.com
The Fraudulent Senator is a new media
investigation into the political and criminal aspects surrounding a
star-studded fundraising event and concert coordinated, underwritten and
produced by West Coast businessman Peter Paul, an event the Federal
Election Commission has come to call "Event 39" in its documents of record.
As Hillary Clinton quests for the White
House, find out why she shouldn't even be in the Senate... |