|
September 16, 2005
- Now that the vitriolic finger pointing has started
to subside and Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco and New Orleans Mayor Ray
Nagin have admitted that maybe, just maybe, there might be some substance to
the assessment that the disaster response from their local and state
governments was practically non-existent, we can revisit news that the
mainstream media opted to bump from the limelight.
It was no surprise that the mainstream media chose to cover
the events taking place in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina 24/7. It
literally was the storm of the century, or at least the decade. The "if it
bleeds it leads” mentality makes mainstream news outlets predictable. While
there were many stories, both despicable and heroic, worth conveying to the
public the aftermath of the hurricane stopped being "breaking news” when the
typical viewer, after hours of repetitive coverage, became eligible for
course credit in the science of flood rescue.
Inevitably, when all of the mainstream
media is focused on "the big story,” lesser events, or perhaps less dramatic
events slip through the cracks. Many times this is a pity but sometimes
those involved in the "lesser stories” breathe a sigh of relief that the
media spotlight wasn’t shining on their situations. Such was the case with
Sandy Berger and the classified documents pilfered from the National
Archives.
While America was preoccupied with the
stories of widespread looting by people we can assume didn’t vote for
President Bush in the last election, inept local and state authorities who
chose not to implement their well designed emergency management plans and
hack politicians taking cheap shots at one of the most comprehensively
coordinated federal disaster management efforts on record, Sandy "The
Burglar” Berger was receiving a slap on the wrists for something an average
American would have been sent to prison for.
If you recall, Berger, a former National
Security Advisor under President Clinton, was arrested and charged with
stealing classified documents and handwritten notes referencing the
government's knowledge of terror threats to the United States. While he put
some of the classified documents in a leather portfolio that he carried into
and out of the National Archives and Records Administration Building in
Washington DC, he stuffed other documents in his pants and jacket. He is on
record as saying that his taking of the classified documents was an "honest
mistake” made in preparation for his testimony before the 9/11 Commission.
Of course, it is remarkable that a
former National Security Advisor – a position that requires an intimate
knowledge of how to handle classified documents – would consider stuffing
them, as well as the personal handwritten notes that correspond with those
documents, down his pants as an "honest mistake.” Anyone worth their salt in
Washington DC politics knows that an "honest mistake” as all encompassing as
Berger’s is about as rare as an intellectually stimulating conversation
between William F. Buckley and Snoop Dog.
For his "honest mistake,” Berger was
ordered to pay a $50,000 fine and to surrender his access to classified
government materials for three years. He was also sentenced to two years
probation and 100 hours of community service.
The mainstream media, except for a very
few publications, literally buried the story.
What should have the American people up
in arms is not the lenient sentence that Berger received, but the fact that
a former National Security Advisor would literally steal then destroy
documents directly related to terrorism threats to our country while
our country is engaged in a war against terrorists!
It is loathsome that the liberal left is
playing politics with the war against terrorism. It truly exposes the
narcissistic mentality of those politicians who would put their political
agendas ahead of the safety, and in fact, the very existence of our country.
What is worse yet is when shyster politicians commit crimes against our
country while literally aiding the enemy in order to protect a former
president’s legacy and a current senator’s political aspirations.
Sandy Berger is guilty of more than
pilfering some inconsequential documents from the National Archives. He is
guilty of putting his politics before his country. He is guilty of
protecting a political legacy before protecting our troops in the
battlefield. He is guilty of committing an obstruction of justice;
sabotaging information directly related to the war against terrorism.
Although the judge in Berger’s case went
beyond the government’s recommendation when imposing his sentence, his
punishment falls short of the seriousness of his crime given the fact that
al Qaeda terrorists are still threatening US cities and killing Americans
all over the globe.
The fitting punishment for Berger’s
selling of his country down the river to protect a political legacy should
have included a period of time where he was walking the halls of a federal
prison asking, "Are those documents in your pants or are you just glad to
see me?”
Related Reading:
Berger fined for taking papers
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050909-122225-2387r.htm
|