Pat Buchanan, the man who
some say contributed to the election of Bill Clinton by
challenging incumbent President George H. W. Bush, is trying
to screw things up again for the GOP. His statement that, "his [George W.
Bush’s] spending is making his father look like Barry Goldwater,
and my view is that domestic social spending is exploding.” Buchanan
continued, "He's not vetoed a single bill, he has gone south on affirmative
action. And I think he's gone AWOL on social and cultural issues." This type
of rhetoric is playing into the hands of the Democrats and Buchanan’s
intention, no matter how honorable, should be questioned.
On the issue of spending it can be argued that if Congress, and this
includes members of both parties, were to actually honor the sentiment of a
balanced budget the spending wouldn’t be nearly as out of control as it is.
Placing the blame at the feet of President George W. Bush is to overlook the
real culprits in this matter, those who propose, vote on and pass the bills
that cost all that money. The villain in the spending mess is the Congress
and to pass the buck onto the shoulders of President Bush is to ignore the
real problem. If we were to count how many times President Bush has
commented on the need for Congress to reign in its out of control spending
the tally would be approaching the hundreds.
On the issue of affirmative action it should be pointed out that the Supreme
Court is in actuality the governing body that had the final say on what
happened in Michigan not President Bush. As a conservative, Pat Buchanan
should be ultimately concerned with state’s rights yet he points the finger
of blame for the continued existence of affirmative action the way of the
federal government. I would ask, when Ward Connerly, the
University of California Regent who has championed the elimination of racial
bias in government and community, was running his Proposition 54 campaign in
the last election, where was Pat Buchanan? President Bush has been touting
equal opportunity for all while the leftists have been touting preferential
treatment for minorities. Buchanan’s accusation twists President Bush’s
words, intentions and deeds and Buchanan would be well served to clarify
that statement in defense of his reputation.
As
far as his contention that President Bush has gone "AWOL on social and
cultural issues,” I would ask him to once again clarify himself. While
teachers and school administrators wrestle with the complexity of No Child
Left Behind, a program geared toward raising the expectations of our
countries students instead of allowing the dumbing-down to continue, the
Bush Administration and in particular First Lady Laura Bush
are championing literacy in the classroom. President Bush has gone further
to make alternative fuel sources a reality than any other president in
history including Bill Clinton. The partnership between Shell Oil and GM in
bringing hydrogen-based fuel cells to the consumer market is proof enough of
that. For the first time ever there are limits set on the amount of mercury
that there can be in our water supply. All of these things directly affect
us yet Mr. Buchanan contends that the Bush Administration is AWOL on social
and cultural issues. I beg to differ.
It would be refreshing for the GOP, especially the far right in the
organization, to realize that harping on issues that polarize the party is
in effect championing the efforts of the Democratic Party. To be certain,
the only things that could possibly come out of Pat Buchanan’s statements
are a boost for the Democratic presidential candidates and a set of inane
talking points that garner no credibility whatsoever.
If Pat Buchanan wants to rail against those who have become today’s
spendthrifts, those who have aided in the racial division of this country
and those who have done nothing to make the country a better place to live
then he should he would be better served to take aim at those who actually
are doing the spending, creating the divide and sitting on their pork
barrels instead of having the courage to stand up for what our country
really needs. Here’s a hint, Pat, it isn’t the guy in the White House. Open
your eyes.
Frank Salvato is a
political media consultant and the managing editor for The New Media Journal.us. He is a
contributing writer for The Washington Dispatch, GOPUSA, OpinionEditorials,
Men’s News Daily, Canada Free Press & AmericanDaily. His pieces are
regularly featured in Townhall.com. He has appeared as a guest on The
O’Reilly Factor, The Kevin Matthews Radio Show (Chicago) and The Brad Messer
Radio Show (San Antonio). His pieces have been recognized by the Japan
Center for Conflict Prevention and are occasionally featured in The
Washington Times and The London Morning Paper as well as other national and
international publications.
|