New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Pelosi Worries About Politics
Over Needed Legislation

EDITORIAL Frank Salvato
January 11, 2004

With the sweeping immigration reforms proposed by President Bush out in the open one would think that a proposal that allows those who are fulfilling a need in the workplaces of our country, positions that American’s choose not to fill, that a proposal that allows them to remain doing so and that helps document millions of undocumented people who now exist in this country, would be a welcome thing. But House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) welcomes it only partially while she insists on injecting partisan politics into the fray. Once again, the Democratic leadership, the very same people who warned that a Bush victory in 2000 would produce a partisan administration and more ugly partisan politics, are leading the way in the ugliness they themselves suggested would exist.

In commenting on President Bush’s initiative Pelosi stated that although it was "welcome, it shouldn’t be presented in the window-dressing of election year politics.” With this comment it seems as though Pelosi would rather have the government come to a screeching halt so as to allow for the increase in the level of "global warming” through all of the politically charged hot air being emitted by many an election campaign instead of having them do the business that the populace actually elected them to do. Thus is the hypocrisy of the Democratic leadership; they would rather complain about others getting nothing done while they themselves set conditions on how and when things get done.

Whether an election year or not, immigration policy in this country was in dire need of attention. Our borders stood wide open to any and all who wanted to transverse the line, including good, bad and terrorist. President Bush, whether you agree wholeheartedly, in part or not at all with his plan has at least addressed the issue and tried to do the right thing by the American people, the American business owners and the people who have illegally come to our country to fill a void that the American people themselves created. To simply take issue with it because it has been proposed during an election year, to say that at any other time it would be welcomed, is to inject politics into the business of running the government and doing the will of the people. It is putting politics above the needs of the country and above the well being of the American people. It is politics not government.

The political climate in this country, admittedly affected by both major political parties, has become an unwelcome bedfellow of government. Where the actual job of governing this country, of administering to the needs of the people and the security and prosperity of our country, is pretty clear cut, the process has been complicated by politically narcissistic intentions and the simple vision has been blurred by politicians who have placed the health and well being of their political parties and political futures on an equal importance with the actual governing of our country.

At issue here is whether Nancy Pelosi is more concerned with how any particular piece of proposed legislation would affect the political climate of the country or whether she is more concerned with doing what is best for the American people and the country. By her statement it would be hard to believe that she is thinking about anything but how the proposed legislation would affect her political party. Because of this she has not only failed her constituents but she has failed the American people.

Frank Salvato is a political media consultant and the managing editor for The New Media Journal.us. He is a contributing writer for The Washington Dispatch, GOPUSA, OpinionEditorials, Men’s News Daily, Canada Free Press & AmericanDaily. His pieces are regularly featured in Townhall.com. He has appeared as a guest on The O’Reilly Factor, The Kevin Matthews Radio Show (Chicago) and The Brad Messer Radio Show (San Antonio). His pieces have been recognized by the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention and are occasionally featured in The Washington Times and The London Morning Paper as well as other national and international publications.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review