Vietnam Veterans are not "flocking” to
John Kerry’s campaign, as his camp would all have us believe. In
the South Carolina primary Kerry’s campaign made a big deal out of the
monumental support they received from Vietnam Veterans. But when all was
said and done, the Kerry campaign received only 33% of the veteran vote. In
other words, the veteran’s of South Carolina didn’t vote for him by a ratio
of 2:1. That’s a far cry from monumental support.
Kerry has been doing quite a bit of walking on both sides of the fence when
it comes to his military career and his anti-war activities. While he should
be appreciated for his service to our country, service that many others gave
their lives performing, his anti-war activities after his service are what
many are finding quite disturbing.
In testimony before Congress Kerry alleged of atrocities being committed by
American troops in the Southeast Asian country. He told of rapes and
mutilations, torture and murder. He spoke of these allegations, most of
which were never proven but for the massacre at My Lai and isolated
instances, as US service men and women were still fighting and dying in the
Vietnam rice fields, cities and jungles. While he was attending and speaking
at rallies here in the United States with the likes of Jane Fonda
and Donald Sutherland, people like Oliver North
and Senator John McCain were risking their lives in a military
action born of the Cold War, designed and implemented by Lyndon
Johnson and Robert McNamara. While he spotlights the
deeds that garnered him a chest full of medals, he broke the code of leaving
no one behind when he turned his back on those who were still fighting in
Vietnam after his return.
Oliver
North, the recipient of two Purple Hearts courtesy of his service in
Vietnam, told radio show host and co-host of FOX News’ Hannity & Colmes,
Sean Hannity, "The Vietnam Veterans Against the War encouraged
people to desert, encouraged people to mutiny - some used what they wrote to
justify fragging officers," and that "John Kerry has blood of American
soldiers on his hands." While some would disagree with this viewpoint still
others, many in number, would contend that this is the way they view Kerry’s
actions.
Still others believe that John Forbes Kerry was in it from the very
beginning to establish and further his political career. Back in his war
activist days Kerry’s anti-American stance didn’t sit well with voters from
his home state. He had outraged the families of POW’s being held in North
Vietnamese prisons with his military hate-speeches and sympathetic tone
toward the North Vietnamese government and he had drawn the ire of many of
his former Navy buddies. His allegations to Congress infuriated the
patriotic among his constituents and they sent him home defeated in his
first bid for a congressional seat.
In 1978 he would be quoted by a reporter from the Boston Herald American who
was goading him about which political office he would aspire to next as
saying, "If I had been calculating, I would have kept my mouth shut when I
got out of the service and run for office on my record.” Kerry was an
assistant district attorney in Massachusetts at the time. He continued,
"There I was, a decorated veteran, a Yale graduate—I could have gone the
traditional road and probably been in Washington now.” Hardly the genuinely
concerned image Kerry would like to have us remember now that he is on the
national scene 26 years later.
To their credit, some of his VVAW comrades knew it even then. In reviewing
Douglas Brinkley’s book Tour of Duty: John Kerry and the
Vietnam War, Jan Barry, a source for Brinkley’s book and
an VVAW organizer who worked with Kerry on the 1971 veterans’ march on
Washington, is quoted as saying, "Kerry’s Ivy League background and the
media spotlight he attracted irked many of his VVAW comrades, who resented
what they felt was a crass maneuver to launch a political campaign from the
righteous platform of their protest.” While Barry goes on to extol Kerry’s
virtues he overwhelmingly validates the contention that many saw through the
political maneuverings of John Forbes Kerry.
Couple all of this with a few little known facts and we can begin to see how
Kerry has manipulated the actualities of his past in order to tailor them
for his future.
Kerry’s tenure on his first swift boat, No. 44, left him with no honors but
rather some skeletons. While in command of Swift Boat No. 44, Kerry and crew
functioned without forethought in a ‘Free Fire Zone’ injudiciously firing at
targets of opportunity achieving a number of enemy kills along with some
civilian deaths as well. His body count included-- a woman, her baby, a 12
year-old boy, an elderly man and several South Vietnamese soldiers. He
freely admits enjoining in this type of activity and the casualties they
caused – even the civilian casualties.
Between December of 1968 and February of 1969 Kerry received two of his
three purple hearts, one for a minor injury to his arm and another for a
minor injury to his thigh.
He
then took command of a second swift boat, No. 94, which operated in the
Mekong Delta. Under his command they totaled 18 missions over a period of 48
days, a far cry from the many who completed full tours of duty there, Oliver
North and Sen. John McCain among this group. It was with this assignment
that he was awarded his Silver Star for killing a Viet Cong soldier who was
already pinned down and wounded in a "Hooch” courtesy of Kerry’s .50 caliber
gunner. It was also on swift boat No. 94 where he received his third Purple
Heart for once again receiving a minor wound from a mine that went off
adjacent to his swift boat. Later, when asked about the severity of the
combat injuries Kerry himself said that one of them cost him about two days
of service, and that the other two did not interrupt his duty. He classified
himself as "walking wounded.”
Keep in mind that John Forbes Kerry was the commander of his swift boats and
that as commander he was the one charged with citing people in his command
for commendations, an interesting fact to say the least.
In April 1969, having opted for early transfer out of the war zone courtesy
of his three minor wounds, Kerry returned state-side to a preferred
assignment as an aide to Rear Admiral Walter F. Schlech, Jr.
Later that year, in October, while he was still on active duty and still
assigned to Admiral Schlech, Kerry was transporting Adam Walinsky
(Robert Kennedy's former speech writer), around New York State
to deliver anti-war speeches. BY January of 1970, Kerry had become
"transformed” by Walinsky's anti-war sentiment and petitioned Admiral
Schlech, "to tell his boss that his conscience dictated that he protest the
war, that he wanted out of the Navy immediately so that he could run for
congress." Admiral Schlech consented and Kerry received an honorable
discharge from the Navy six months early.
While Kerry is quick to point out his chest full of medals from Vietnam, he
is not as quick to release his medical records from that same period,
records that would verify that his injuries were superficial at best. And as
Kerry pontificates on his war record while on the campaign trail, the vast
majority of those in the know have either refused to come forward with the
actualities of how he received his silver star, have recanted the stories
that have Kerry acting ineffectively and dangerously as a leader during his
command of swift boats 44 and 94 or when questioned on the matter spin their
way out of the question by referring to any and all who question Kerry’s
performance in Vietnam as unpatriotic and anti-veteran. It would behoove
Kerry to do the same thing that his surrogates pressed President Bush
to do – release all his records, both military and medical, so the American
people can be the judge of just how much of a hero he really is.
Like so many before us we too should be able to see the truth about the
"meritorious service” John Forbes Kerry performed in the name of his
country. One thing is for certain; John Forbes Kerry has no room to say that
President George W. Bush deceived anyone. His "war hero” status is hanging
by one of the threads his medals are hanging from.
Frank Salvato is a political media consultant, an
editor for The Washington Dispatch and the Managing Editor for The New Media Journal.us.
He is a contributing writer to OpinionEditorials.com, ChronWatch.com and
AmericanDaily.com. He has appeared as a guest on The O’Reilly Factor, The
Kevin Matthews Radio Show (Chicago) and The Brad Messer Radio Show (San
Antonio). His pieces are regularly featured in Townhall.com, GOP-USA, The
Iconoclast.com and the Free Republic Network. His pieces have been
recognized by the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention and are occasionally
featured in The Washington Times and The London Morning Paper as well as
other national and international publications.
 |