New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Handicapping Outrage
EDITORIAL Frank Salvato
May 6, 2004

It seems that all the pundits and politicos are in an outrage over the abuse of the prisoners of war in Iraq and rightly so. The treatment of anyone, enemy combatant or not, should never drop to that of the lowest common denominator. To its credit, the United States military has brought charges against those responsible, have been conducting investigations and making arrests with regard to reports of abuse for well over a year. They are doing things by the book, by standard operating procedure, as it should be. But through all of this one thing has been blatantly obvious, there are two standards being employed when it comes to outrage both in the Middle East and throughout the free world. That double standard is alive here in the United States as well.

Ever since the CBS aired the pictures of the prisoners of war in Iraq, who they contend were abused at the hands of their US military captors, we have heard a steady litany of condemnation. We have heard how cruel and unacceptable it was for those prisoners to have been humiliated let alone disgraced throughout the Arab and free worlds. Pictures showing piles of naked Iraqi prisoners of war with their gleeful captors have engulfed the print and electronic media to the point that the late night talk shows have made them part of their monologs. President Bush has condemned as "disgusting” the events that took place at the Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad. Just about every politician has made a point of saying that they were sickened by what they saw. And Congress is kicking around the idea of convening yet another congressional commission to look into the actions that took place in the middle of the Iraqi war zone, this despite the fact the military has procedures for just such things and is conducting their standard investigations according to their rule of law.

What happened at Abu Ghriab, to say the least, is disturbing. But when all is said and done the prisoners in those photos are quite a bit better off than they could have been. They are alive, they are not marred in any way physically and the deepest wound they possess from the events that took place are psychological in nature. Some could argue that they would have experienced much worse at the hands of fellow inmates should they have been tried, found guilty and sentenced to federal prisons here in the United States. There, humiliating acts of degradation and horrific acts of violence, some ending in death, happen on a daily basis yet we hear no outrage about those events.

On March 31st of this year the mainstream media brought the horrific pictures of four murdered Blackwater Security Consultants in Fallujah to the people of the world. Americans, but for those pathetic creatures who cheer when our country suffers any kind of setback, were appalled and sickened to see the images of the four contractors as they were presented. Some but not all of us were outraged. They had been ambushed, yanked from their vehicles, stomped upon and set on fire. In one case the victim was still alive. While a crowd of cheering Islamic militants celebrated their "victory” in the streets the charred corpses of the murdered Americans hung from the support beams of the local bridge, cameras clicking, for the entire world to see. Al Jazeera and al Arabia broadcast the pictures of the burnt, mutilated bodies like NBC teases the finale of Friends.

People of the world expressed their consternation with the events that occurred in Fallujah that day. Most didn’t question the response when US troops moved to quell the activities of the barbarous few that perpetrated these crimes against humanity. But their dismay was just that, it wasn’t outrage. They shook their heads and talked about the humanity but there really wasn’t any outrage about the slaughter.

This lackluster dismay wasn’t just confined to nations other than the US either. There were those here in our country that touted the quasi-socialist line that the United States brought the atrocities upon itself with their actions in Iraq. These are the kinds of people who can find something wrong with anything that the United States does. They are Americans in name only, people consumed with a nationalistic self-loathing.

But the thing that is most disturbing about the response to the slaughter of the contractors in Fallujah was that people were more outraged by the broadcasts of the pictures than they were by the actual events that took place. People were more outraged that mainstream media outlets were publishing the pictures of the charred hanging corpses than they were with those who perpetrated the atrocities, atrocities that were committed in the name of a tyrannical status quo.

Now, the people of the Middle East, of the Arab world, want the rest of the world to understand their outrage over an act of humiliation.

Pardon me for not being politically correct but I can’t find it within myself to place someone’s humiliation ahead of savage butchery when it comes to outrage. The fact that anyone else can do so…well, I find it outrageous.

Frank Salvato is a political media consultant and the managing editor for The New Media Journal.us. He has appeared as a guest on The O’Reilly Factor, The Kevin Matthews Radio Show (Chicago) and The Brad Messer Radio Show (San Antonio). His pieces have been recognized by the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention and are occasionally featured in The Washington Times and The London Morning Paper as well as other national and international publications.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review