Although I will admit that I am usually one to wait until the
trial is finished, the jury back and the verdict in, it would seem that
David Kay’s final report on the WMD situation in Iraq points out
one thing, there were no "massive piles of WMD, in Iraq immediately prior to
Operation Iraqi Freedom.” That being said, it appears that out of the myriad
of reasons presented to the American people for ousting Saddam Hussein
from power, only one of them was incorrect. In every other matter known to
mankind that is a damn good percentage.
The fact that the intelligence afforded to President Bush and
our legislators by the Central Intelligence Agency, which was corroborated
by intelligence organization from around the world, was exaggerated is an
alarming thing. When an agency charged with knowing the unknown cannot
accurately possess information purposely being kept from them one would
think the head of that agency would refrain from walking into the Oval
Office and stating unsubstantiated reports as fact. Of course George
Tenet didn’t do this but this brings me to a point, the information
that was used with regard to WMD was presented to the President and the
legislators of our country, including John Kerry, John
Edwards and Joe Lieberman, in good faith. For anyone,
including the three presidential contenders named, to point fingers in
hindsight is convoluted and hypocritical, especially when votes were cast
authorizing the use of force based on the information afforded to all.
The galling aspect of this entire situation is the fact that liberals in
this country, including anti-war protesters, Bush-haters, Democrats who find
themselves on the left side of their own party and seven presidential
candidates from the Democratic Party, are trying to paint George Bush as a
deceiver, a liar. Such a contention is libelous at the very least.
As Jonah Goldberg, an editor of National Review Online,
so succinctly pointed out in an article for Townhall, "the idea that the
president lied to the American people hinges on - at least - one almost
impossible fact: that George W. Bush knew for a certainty that the
intelligence agencies of America, Britain, France, Germany, Israel,
Australia, as well as the United Nations and countless independent experts
were all wrong.” This would be a big stretch for a man that the liberal left
claims is extremely unintelligent; in fact, it would be an incredible feat
for Stephen Hawking.
But
as we head into a presidential election, a time when Adolph Hitler’s
old adage, "If you repeat a slogan long enough, they will believe it,” comes
into play, we will no doubt hear about the incredible deception that was
practiced by George W. Bush and his administration in the days leading to
Operation Iraqi Freedom. These assertions can only be categorized as untrue
and politically motivated but for reasons only understood by the politically
spun mind, they will be promulgated anyway, true deception practiced
shamelessly.
If we are to be attentive to the needs of our country, remaining above the
fray, refusing to contribute to the volleys of half-truths, spin and
innuendo that most political campaigns engage in, we need to address the
fact that our intelligence community is listing aimlessly in the sea that is
clandestine knowledge. As I stated in an article titled,
The Intelligence
Problem Started 11 Years Ago, this handicap didn’t start with the
Bush Administration. In fact, one of the leading Democratic candidates
played a key roll in "gutting” our intelligence capabilities.
Throughout the 1990’s John Kerry, Senator from Massachusetts, asked this
question, as published in the Congressional Record on May 1, 1997, "Now that
[the Cold War] struggle is over, why is it that our vast intelligence
apparatus continues to grow…” In fact he produced several pieces of
legislation calling for reductions in funding for the American intelligence
community. In 1994 Kerry introduced S.B. 1826 that proposed cutting $1
billion from the budgets of the National Foreign Intelligence Program and
from Tactical Intelligence, and freezing their budgets. In 1995 he
introduced Senate Bill 1290 that would have "reduced the Intelligence budget
by $300 million in each of fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000,”
$1.5 billion overall. For John Kerry to be traipsing around the country
pointing fingers at George W. Bush for "deceiving” the American public while
the very reason our intelligence was compromised in the first place is
directly related to his actions is the height of hypocrisy and, quite
frankly, deceptive.
President Bush should come to the American public and address the matter. He
should state it very matter-of-factly and confront the accusations of his
accusers. The American people are not daft and they will in the long run
accept the position he and the legislators who voted with him were in. He
should spotlight the flawed intelligence not only from the CIA but also from
the other intelligence agencies from around the world including the United
Nation’s published reports on Hussein’s capabilities. But should President
Bush do this, his opposition should be forewarned that he should also
spotlight the truth as to why our intelligence community has become
second-rate. I am not too sure those on the left, John Kerry, Carl
Levin and Bill Clinton included, would enjoy that
information being shared with the American public.
Was the intelligence used to argue the matter of WMD inaccurate? Yes, it
was. Would that have changed the fact that Saddam Hussein was a threat to
the security of the world? No, it would not have. Is the world a safer place
now that Hussein is gone? Absolutely. But the one thing that cannot be said
is that George W. Bush is a liar. Anyone asserting that thought is being
deceptive, and someone who deceives is called a…
Frank Salvato is a
political media consultant and the managing editor for The New Media Journal.us. He is a
contributing writer for The Washington Dispatch, GOPUSA, OpinionEditorials,
Men’s News Daily, Canada Free Press & AmericanDaily. His pieces are
regularly featured in Townhall.com. He has appeared as a guest on The
O’Reilly Factor, The Kevin Matthews Radio Show (Chicago) and The Brad Messer
Radio Show (San Antonio). His pieces have been recognized by the Japan
Center for Conflict Prevention and are occasionally featured in The
Washington Times and The London Morning Paper as well as other national and
international publications.
|