New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Agreeing with Charlie Rangel? Get Out!
War on Terror/Frank Salvato, Managing Editor
December 22, 2004 - If anyone were to say that I would ever agree with Congressman Charlie Rangel I would normally offer up a half-hearted chuckle. I say normally because today I found myself in agreement with him. I have disagreed with the congressman on almost every aspect of Operation Iraqi Freedom. He is against the war. I understand why it was necessary. He stands in opposition to President Bush and I stand in support of our leader. But when it comes to how other countries in the Middle East aid us in the War on Terror I find myself in agreement with Mr. Rangel. Our Middle Eastern Allies are poor allies at best.

The United States contributes the largest part of the quarter of a million plus fighting force in Iraq. We do so with a modest contingent of true allies. Chief among those countries willing to join us in a job none too pleasant – dirty work that should have been dealt with long ago – are Britain, Australia, Italy, a contingent from Eastern Europe, as well as troops from over 30 more nations. The governments of France, Germany, Russia and China were a bit too busy stuffing billions of dollars of oil stained money in their pockets and trying to keep the cash cow that was Saddam Hussein in power to bother with the "nuisance” known as terror. Evidently, greed trumps human rights in their book. It is precisely for that reason I suggest we drop their designations as allies but then the Kumbaya crowd would whine for a month of Sundays because we weren’t reaching out to governments that cheer every time we experience a setback. But I digress.

With the exception of the Pakistani Army operating within their own border territories and those Iraqis the allies have trained, the list of countries putting boots on the ground in Iraq is stunningly devoid of anything Middle Eastern. There isn’t one soldier fighting to eliminate the terror born of the Middle Eastern culture who originates from a Middle Eastern country. While Saudi Arabia says it is "cracking down” on extremists in their country the effects from that "crack down” are negligible. Jordan, Egypt and Kuwait all "support us” in the War on Terror but their support is tantamount to "coat holding.” Syria and Iran say they are against terrorism but they are two of the biggest supporters – no pun intended – of the terrorist insurgents now waging jihad against the allied forces in Iraq. And Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi is walking around stunned that he wasn’t given a "reward” for giving up his WMD (Hey, Muammar, not having your country bombed back into the Stone Age was the reward).

Here is where I agree with Charlie Rangel, and believe me it isn’t easy to admit it. The United States needs to pressure these Middle Eastern countries into correcting the wrong they have been guilty of allowing to fester. They need to be held responsible for allowing and fostering the terror movement. Through their complacency they have become the terrorists’ ally.

Terrorism was born – and if not born certainly perfected – of the fanatical Middle Eastern culture. It was refined under their governments’ blind eye and allowed to spread like a cancer through their mosques and schools pervading and becoming acceptable throughout their societies. Where we in the free world would never think of strapping belts of explosives to our teenaged sons or daughters and taking pictures as if we were celebrating a graduation, parents in the Middle East see nothing wrong with celebrating the beauty of a suicide bombing. In fact, these families are revered. Where the families of Columbine killers Klebold and Harris bear the burden of their sons’ actions as a shocked community heals over time, Middle Eastern families – not all but an incredibly sizable amount – celebrate the martyrdom of these misguided children poisoned by their own parents to kill in the bastardized name of religion. It is these people who are guilty of allowing terror to prevail within their culture. So too should this culture provide the wind that snuffs out the flame of terror.

There are many ways to pressure these countries into picking up arms against those who they created and abetted. We can use all of the traditional avenues of diplomatic persuasion first of course. Employing these tactics against the trading partners of these countries may be a brilliant move as well. Perhaps a good place to start would be to threaten the withholding of all foreign aid to any Middle Eastern country that doesn’t actively join in the War on Terror. A creative mind would have a field day coming up with pressure tactics in order to make boots-on-the-ground Middle Eastern participation in the War on Terror a reality.

It’s time that the world community, including the Middle Eastern countries, realize that this war is not of a political nature but of something much more serious. Religious fanatics come in all shapes and sizes but the ones who smile as they fly airplanes into buildings bring the point home, that point being, terrorism is something that must be erased from the face of the planet for the good of all peoples. Allied troops are doing their job. It’s time everyone else did theirs.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review