New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Responsibility:
The First Amendment's Custodian

EDITORIAL Frank Salvato
May 22, 2003

The First Amendment. There was a reason why our Founding Fathers tackled the issue of freedom of expression first. For what is freedom if there is no free speech, no opportunity to agree, disagree, explain, debate, champion and even condemn? It is the essential building block for freedom and without it freedom cannot exist. But along with the freedom of speech comes an unwritten tenet to protect it through the application of responsibility. In the days of our Forefather’s honor, dignity and respect were virtues held in the highest esteem and free speech was one of the beneficiaries. Today the ideal of free speech, as our Forefather’s intended, is in crisis and the most egregious perpetrator of irresponsibility is our mainstream media.

As we start to unravel the web of deception that was weaved at the New York Times the importance of responsibility comes more into focus. Here we have a major publication, not only to New York, New England or the United States, but an important publication to the world, and it is revealed that one of their star reporters was fabricating the facts of his stories, stories the readers digested as the truth. ‘All the news that’s fit to print’ reigns on the Times’ banner but with one person’s irresponsibility the entire credibility of the newspaper comes into question. Through the abuse of his freedom of speech, Jayson Blair single handedly brought a credibility problem onto the head of ‘The Grey Lady’.

It is quite easy to employ the responsibility needed to champion free speech and The First Amendment. It is a very hard task to rectify the loss of credibility brought about by abusing the right of free speech through irresponsibility.

Partisan politics has tarnished many a publication’s reputation through the abuse of free speech. Editorialization of the news stories has erupted as the method of choice for many of the country’s news reporters, be they from the electronic or print medium. Through the editorialization of news stories many of the publications and news shows throughout the United States and the world have slanted stories for the good or the detriment of a political party. It has become a game of power overseen by the powerbroker that desires homage. Sacrificed daily is the public’s opportunity to gather all of the facts and/or accounts of any given event, devoid of the reporter’s outlook, in an effort to assemble an informed opinion of their own accord. The mainstream media has not been blind to the fact that today’s public has a taste for immediacy and like the heroin dealer who supplies to the demand, the mainstream media feeds the public its meal already chewed, swallowed and digested.

The responsibility required to assure the health of the First Amendment’s freedom of expression is situated on a two-way street. As much as it is the responsibility of the mainstream media to police itself and maintain the highest of standards in requiring that the facts be heard without editorialization, so too is it the responsibility of the public to demand that these standards be administered to.

Civic virtue, defined as people putting the common welfare above their own interests, is doing a slow fade to black in the United States today. The idea of doing what is right for the greater good is being replaced by the need to attain success in any given field. The truth is taking a back seat to ratings and the sensationalism that leads to their elevated numbers. They say, "if it bleeds it sells” and from this writer’s vantage point it looks as though if it isn’t bleeding enough the mainstream media finds it acceptable to make it bleed to their needs.

The First Amendment is in need of a few good custodians, people who will take it upon themselves to say to those who would bastardize its principle, "no more.” It is our responsibility, the American public’s, to express our dismay with the mainstream media’s biases and editorialization of the facts. If the New York Times doesn’t have the intestinal fortitude to provide the truth without innuendo then we need to stop buying it. If the big three television networks can’t refrain from calling elections before the polls are closed then we should change the channel. It is through our apathy in these instances that we enable the mainstream media to continue the destructive practices that are taking a toll on our First Amendment right to freedom of expression.

It is time that we extract ourselves from the quagmire of apathy and stand up for the rights that we have been afforded as Americans. A good way to start is by demanding that our mainstream media hold themselves to an elevated standard that embraces the principles of truth. If we, the American people don’t assume the role of caretaker to The Constitution of the United States who is supposed to do it?

Frank Salvato is a political media consultant and the managing editor for The New Media Journal.us. He is a contributing writer for The Washington Dispatch, GOPUSA, OpinionEditorials, Men’s News Daily, Canada Free Press & AmericanDaily. His pieces are regularly featured in Townhall.com. He has appeared as a guest on The O’Reilly Factor, The Kevin Matthews Radio Show (Chicago) and The Brad Messer Radio Show (San Antonio). His pieces have been recognized by the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention and are occasionally featured in The Washington Times and The London Morning Paper as well as other national and international publications.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review