The First Amendment. There was a reason why our Founding Fathers tackled the
issue of freedom of expression first. For what is freedom if there is no
free speech, no opportunity to agree, disagree, explain, debate, champion
and even condemn? It is the essential building block for freedom and without
it freedom cannot exist. But along with the freedom of speech comes an
unwritten tenet to protect it through the application of responsibility. In
the days of our Forefather’s honor, dignity and respect were virtues held in
the highest esteem and free speech was one of the beneficiaries. Today the
ideal of free speech, as our Forefather’s intended, is in crisis and the
most egregious perpetrator of irresponsibility is our mainstream media.
As we start to unravel the web of deception that was weaved at the New York
Times the importance of responsibility comes more into focus. Here we have a
major publication, not only to New York, New England or the United States,
but an important publication to the world, and it is revealed that one of
their star reporters was fabricating the facts of his stories, stories the
readers digested as the truth. ‘All the news that’s fit to print’ reigns on
the Times’ banner but with one person’s irresponsibility the entire
credibility of the newspaper comes into question. Through the abuse of his
freedom of speech, Jayson Blair single handedly brought a
credibility problem onto the head of ‘The Grey Lady’.
It is quite easy to employ the responsibility needed to champion free speech
and The First Amendment. It is a very hard task to rectify the loss of
credibility brought about by abusing the right of free speech through
irresponsibility.
Partisan politics has tarnished many a publication’s reputation through the
abuse of free speech. Editorialization of the news stories has erupted as
the method of choice for many of the country’s news reporters, be they from
the electronic or print medium. Through the editorialization of news stories
many of the publications and news shows throughout the United States and the
world have slanted stories for the good or the detriment of a political
party. It has become a game of power overseen by the powerbroker that
desires homage. Sacrificed daily is the public’s opportunity to gather all
of the facts and/or accounts of any given event, devoid of the reporter’s
outlook, in an effort to assemble an informed opinion of their own accord.
The mainstream media has not been blind to the fact that today’s public has
a taste for immediacy and like the heroin dealer who supplies to the demand,
the mainstream media feeds the public its meal already chewed, swallowed and
digested.
The responsibility required to assure the health of the First Amendment’s
freedom of expression is situated on a two-way street. As much as it is the
responsibility of the mainstream media to police itself and maintain the
highest of standards in requiring that the facts be heard without
editorialization, so too is it the responsibility of the public to demand
that these standards be administered to.
Civic virtue, defined as people putting the common welfare above their own
interests, is doing a slow fade to black in the United States today. The
idea of doing what is right for the greater good is being replaced by the
need to attain success in any given field. The truth is taking a back seat
to ratings and the sensationalism that leads to their elevated numbers. They
say, "if it bleeds it sells” and from this writer’s vantage point it looks
as though if it isn’t bleeding enough the mainstream media finds it
acceptable to make it bleed to their needs.
The First Amendment is in need of a few good custodians, people who will
take it upon themselves to say to those who would bastardize its principle,
"no more.” It is our responsibility, the American public’s, to express our
dismay with the mainstream media’s biases and editorialization of the facts.
If the New York Times doesn’t have the intestinal fortitude to provide the
truth without innuendo then we need to stop buying it. If the big three
television networks can’t refrain from calling elections before the polls
are closed then we should change the channel. It is through our apathy in
these instances that we enable the mainstream media to continue the
destructive practices that are taking a toll on our First Amendment right to
freedom of expression.
It is time that we extract ourselves from the quagmire of apathy and stand
up for the rights that we have been afforded as Americans. A good way to
start is by demanding that our mainstream media hold themselves to an
elevated standard that embraces the principles of truth. If we, the American
people don’t assume the role of caretaker to The Constitution of the United
States who is supposed to do it?
Frank Salvato is a
political media consultant and the managing editor for The New Media Journal.us. He is a
contributing writer for The Washington Dispatch, GOPUSA, OpinionEditorials,
Men’s News Daily, Canada Free Press & AmericanDaily. His pieces are
regularly featured in Townhall.com. He has appeared as a guest on The
O’Reilly Factor, The Kevin Matthews Radio Show (Chicago) and The Brad Messer
Radio Show (San Antonio). His pieces have been recognized by the Japan
Center for Conflict Prevention and are occasionally featured in The
Washington Times and The London Morning Paper as well as other national and
international publications.
|