New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Once Again, The Perpetrators
Accuse Their Opponent

EDITORIAL Frank Salvato
August 13, 2003
Maybe it was working all those years as Ted Kennedy’s chief of staff but it would seem that the truth doesn’t matter much to Mary Beth Cahill. Cahill, the Kerry campaign’s chief of staff – gee I wonder how she got that job – recently accused the Bush campaign of launching a "vicious smear attack against John Kerry.” Of course, this is in comparison to the senator’s "demure” attitude toward the president during his own presidential campaign.

The issue at hand is the ad being run by the Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth (SBVT). Cahill, as do many of the others in the Kerry crowd, believes whole-heartedly that the Bush team is behind the Swift Boat veteran’s organization. They believe the Bush campaign is the driving force behind the ad because the Swift Boat veterans are, "led by a longtime Republican operative and financed by GOP contributors with strong tries to President George W. Bush." But to make this assertion based on those facts only opens up the door of hypocrisy for Cahill and her cohorts, a door that should be made revolving for their convenience.

For the record, the Bush campaign has repeatedly stated they have nothing to do with SBVT, a 527 group. They have repeatedly stated they do not question John Kerry’s military service and have requested that all 527 groups cease their activities this election cycle so that the two contenders can focus on the issues. Not surprisingly, Cahill conveniently ignores the Bush campaign’s denials – obviously chomping at the bit to call President Bush a liar once again – and absolutely overlooks any possibility of calling off the "independent” 527 groups that support John Kerry.

The larger outrage here is being overlooked completely, not only by the press but by the American people as well. Here we have Cahill, someone who is no stranger to calling someone a liar without proof – her former boss does it all the time – accusing the Bush campaign of not only being behind the Swift Boat veteran’s ad but of breaking the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law by doing so. In the face of the Bush campaign’s specific denials to any affiliation with SBVT Cahill is effectively calling President Bush and his campaign team liars. And she does so, in her "outrage,” as she panders for more financial support for the Kerry campaign.

But what else is new? The Democratic Party of late has had no problem embracing ideas and sentiments that are nowhere near being truthful.

Recently John Kerry made reference to people having been disenfranchised during the 2000 election in Florida. He also intimated that the Republicans stole the 2000 election via the Sunshine State. Both of these contentions are not only wrong, they have been proven to be so time and again, yet the Kerry campaign, run by Cahill, continues to lie, continues to mislead the American people, all in the pursuit of narcissistic power.

Several of the mainstream media outlets, including USA Today and the Washington Post, did extensive research into the Florida re-count. They tried tallying the votes in every fashion they could imagine. But no matter how hard they tried to manipulate the numbers George W. Bush always came out the winner, many times by more votes than were officially tallied. Yet today we still hear people like Cahill, Kerry, Edwards and Kennedy insisting that the election was stolen in Florida. This contention is not only disingenuous it is a lie. They are liars for perpetrating this myth and they are lying to us, the American people.

The same can be said about the alleged disenfranchisement of Florida voters during the 2000 presidential election.

In a recent article by Larry Elder, Peter Kirsanow, a sitting member of the US Commission of Civil Rights and an American-African, states that after exhaustive investigations by both the US Civil Rights Commission and the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, "There was absolutely no truth to any of those allegations…not one person who was intimidated…(or) had their vote stolen. There was no disenfranchisement…no truth to any of those allegations.”

In light of this expert and proven testimony one would think that leaders such as Kerry and Kennedy along with operatives McAuliffe and Cahill would be bound to tell the truth. Evidently we are grossly mistaken. Kirsanow continued to explain, "The problem here is that, from the very beginning, a number of myths flowed from the 2000 election. People who are in a position of authority and responsibility, who should be dispelling those myths, fan the flames even more.”

So, while Cahill and Kerry, Kennedy and Edwards "fan the flames” of divisiveness as they almost drunkenly stager back and forth across the line of truth we need to ask some questions of the Kerry campaign:

1) If the Bush campaign is breaking the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law by colluding with Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth why aren’t the DNC lawyers trying to intimidate them, as they are the Swift Boat veterans?

2) If Cahill believes that 527s are such an outrage then why doesn’t she call for all of them, both pro-Bush and pro-Kerry to cease their activities? Why doesn’t she condemn them?

The answers to these questions couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the fact that people like Harold Ickes and George Soros are knee-deep in 527 affiliations now would it?

Once again, the Democrats try to blame their opponents for the exact things they do.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review