New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
Massacre In The Congo Despite The UN
EDITORIAL Frank Salvato
July 24, 2003
Over 100 mutilated bodies in ten days and there wasn’t anything that could have been done about it. That was the brutal discovery of the French peacekeepers in Bunia and Tchomia in the African nation of Congo. The bodies were of refugees who were trying to flee the violence that has plagued the country for years. This is a perfect example of the impotency of the United Nations and their limited idea of mandated peacekeeping. And they want us in Liberia.

The UN mandate limits the French peacekeeper’s role to defending the city, or by our standards the village of Bunia amid the massacres of refugees in areas just outside the mandated area. This isn’t the only French peacekeeping force in Congo; this is an additional peacekeeping force inside the country under the command of the European Union. Curiously, the Congolese have not piled up any mutilated bodies at the French Embassy gates unlike what is happening in Liberia.

Meanwhile, the good Reverend Jesse Jackson has taken to his media pulpit preaching to his political flock. He is pontificating that the reason President Bush hasn’t sent our young men and women of the armed forces into action in Liberia is directly related to the issue of race in America. With the slaughters still fresh in the Congolese air we should look at that tragedy and take heed in understanding the lesson that it could teach us whether the good reverend likes it or not.

The Congo massacres spotlight the problem of intervening in African civil war. Even with two separate peacekeeping forces in the country the slaughter goes on. One has to ask why? One would have to ask whether the UN resolution mandating the peacekeeping action was a poorly written mandate as was the case in Iraq, whether the intervention was unwelcome but for one side of a struggle between a nations people or whether there is another mass murderer being allowed to remain in power by a counsel of dreamers whose solutions to major problems seems to be mired in fantasy and too little too late.

We learned a very painful lesson as a nation when we stood witness to the slaughter of our troops in Mogadishu. Heeding the call of the United Nations once again to be the world’s muscle while they employed another poorly thought out peacekeeping mandate, it became quite obvious that the warring factions in Somalia did not welcome our existence there. Armed with rules of engagement that wouldn’t even allow our troops to engage those who would murder villagers trying to access humanitarian food shipments we stood idly by witnessing the carnage while those under siege begged us to help. With each death they learned to hate the Americans. That hate was effectively placed onto Americans courtesy of the United Nations and their poorly thought out mandate. To make that mistake again would be to have not learned from a disaster experienced.

Perhaps we should insist that peace, or some semblance of it, actually be attained before we assume the role of peacekeeper (what a novel idea – peacekeepers keeping the peace instead of having to achieve the peace). It would be more palatable to subject our young men and women to a situation devoid of rag-tag rebels driving SUV’s and toting rocket propelled grenade launchers than it would be to insert them into a situation where both sides want to kill them because of who they are, no matter the reason of why they are there, all to satisfy a UN mandate that won’t work due to its limitations.
Either way, it looks as though the UN won’t be doing much of anything about it until at least September 1st when the current mandate expires. Never mind that hundreds more will probably die while the UN plods along on their diplomatic track, talking out the mundane as they feast on the culinary creations of New York’s eateries and exist among the beautiful people. They are quite the humanitarian group, the United Nations Ambassadors. I am sure they could explain it all to the families of those who were butchered outside of Bunia…that is until one of the family members puts a machete through one of their skulls for being an idiot!

Frank Salvato is a political media consultant and the managing editor for The New Media Journal.us. He is a contributing writer for The Washington Dispatch, GOPUSA, OpinionEditorials, Men’s News Daily, Canada Free Press & AmericanDaily. His pieces are regularly featured in Townhall.com. He has appeared as a guest on The O’Reilly Factor, The Kevin Matthews Radio Show (Chicago) and The Brad Messer Radio Show (San Antonio). His pieces have been recognized by the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention and are occasionally featured in The Washington Times and The London Morning Paper as well as other national and international publications.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review