|

Will Fitzhugh
Degree of
Difficulty
March 9, 2009
In gymnastics, performances are judged not just on execution but also on
the degree of difficulty. The same system is used in diving and in ice
skating. An athlete is of course judged on how well they do something,
but their score also includes how hard it was to do that particular
exercise.
One of the reasons, in my view, that more than a million of our high
school graduates each year are in remedial courses after they have been
accepted at colleges is that the degree of difficulty set for them in
their high school courses has been too low, by college standards.
Surveys comparing the standards of high school teachers and college
professors routinely discover that students who their teachers judge to
be very well prepared, for instance in reading, research and writing,
are seen as not very well prepared by college professors.
According to the Diploma to Nowhere report issued last summer by
the Strong American Schools project, tens of thousands of students are
surprised, embarrassed and depressed to find that, after getting As and
Bs in their high school courses, even in the "hard” ones, they are
judged to be not ready for college work and must take non-credit
remedial courses to make up for the academic deficiencies that they
naturally assumed they did not have.
If we could imagine a ten point degree-of-difficulty scale for high
school courses, surely arithmetic would rank near the bottom, say at a
one, and calculus would rank at the top, near a ten. Courses in Chinese
and Physics, and perhaps AP European History, would be near the top of
the scale as well.
When it comes to academic writing, however, and the English departments
only ask their students for personal and creative writing, and the
five-paragraph essay, they are setting the degree of difficulty at or
near the bottom of the academic writing scale. The standard kind of
writing might be the equivalent of having math students being blocked
from moving beyond fractions and decimals.
Naturally, students who have achieved high grades on their high school
writing, but at a very low level of difficulty, are likely to be shocked
when they are asked to write a 10-20-page research paper when they enter
college. They have never encountered that degree of difficulty in their
high school careers.
It would be as if math students were taking only decimals and fractions,
and then being asked to solve elementary calculus problems when they
start their higher education.
I was shocked to discover that even the most famous program for gifted
students in the United States, the Johns Hopkins Center for Talented
Youth, which began as a search for mathematically precocious youth, and
has very challenging programs for bright students in the summer, when it
comes to writing, has sponsored a contest for "Creative Minds” to have
students do "Creative Nonfiction.” This genre turns out to be like a
diary entry about some event or circumstance in the author’s life,
together with their feelings about it.
This may fit very well with the degree of difficulty in many if not most
high school English classes, but, even if is done well (and wins the
contest, for example) it falls very short of the expectations for
academic writing at the college level.
My main experience for the last thirty years or so, has been with high
school writing in the social studies, principally history. I started
The Concord Review in 1987, as the only journal in the world for the
academic papers of high school students. My expectation was that
students might send me their 4,000-word history research papers, of the
sort which the International Baccalaureate requires of its Diploma
students.
I did receive some excellent IB Extended Essays, and I have now
published 846 papers by secondary students from 44 states and 35 other
countries, but as time went by, the level-of-difficulty in submissions
went up, as did the excellence in their execution.
These students who sent me longer and better essays, did so on their own
initiative, inspired, by the chance for recognition, and the example of
their peers, to raise the degree of difficulty themselves, even as each
set of gymnasts, divers, and ice skaters do for the Olympics ever four
years. I began receiving first-class 8,000-word papers, then 13,000-word
papers from high school history scholars. The longest I have published
was 21,000 words, on the Mountain Meadows Massacre in Utah in 1857, by a
girl who had also taken time to be a nationally-ranked equestrian, an
activity which also features a degree-of-difficulty measure. Students
like the ones I publish find themselves mobbed when they get to college,
by their peers who have never had to write a research paper before.
We now
require too few of our high school students to read nonfiction
books—another failure in setting an appropriate degree of difficulty—and
we set the degree-of-difficulty level far too low when it comes to
academic writing. We should consider giving up this destructive practice
of holding the performance of our students to such a low standard, and
one that disables too many of them for early success in higher
education. Lots of our high school students can and will meet a higher
standard, if we just offer it to them. |