New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
About Ron Ewart
Ron Ewart, President, National Association of Rural Landowners, an organization dedicated to re-establish, preserve, protect and defend property rights. He maintains a website here.
Social Bookmarking
Past Articles
We're Out Spent, Out Legislated, & Out Lawyered
Tis the Season to Be Folly
Rising American Hostility & the Bell Shaped Curve
A Declaration of Individual Sovereignty
A ‘Peoples’ Temple Cocktail’, Anyone?
The Fraud That Is ‘Conservation’
Disgusting! Hollow! Samo-Samo!
The Fuggers, Rothschilds, The Fed & The...
Complexity: Enemy of Freedom, Harbinger of...
What If America Becomes a Third World Country?

Ron Ewart
We're Out Spent, Out Legislated, & Out Lawyered
February 27, 2010

There is a common phrase and is relevant to so many different situations: follow the money.

 

Take for example the man-caused global warming fiasco, or as we call it, the g/w scam? It has been reported that the federal government issues grants for so-called scientific climate research, to the tune of around $4 Billion a year. We say "so-called" scientific climate research, because it isn't science at all. This kind of "science" starts with an "outcome", that man is causing global warming and then "fudges", "fiddles" and "manipulates" the data to support the outcome. It's called Made-As-Instructed science. It isn't real science, but that is where the money is going. Because you see, those in power exploit the doctored science and use the "outcome" to make policy and to "lie" to the public by telling them that the science and the outcome are sound and the policy is absolutely necessary. "It's a dire emergency, you know."

 

Another case is the whole environmental movement itself, as promoted by national and international entities for the purpose of making global policy to implement the goals of third world social justice. (See Agenda 21) The international community, through the United Nations, (to which the U. S. Government is a willing partner) use radical environmental protection legislation and your guilty conscience, to facilitate the transfer of wealth and resources from the wealthy nations to the poorer nations, using the over-emphasized lie that man is "killing" the planet and must be reined in by global governance. The U. S. Constitution and American sovereignty are impediments to the global will and must be abolished, no matter how many Americans may spout freedom and liberty phrases.

 

So once again we say, "Follow the Money". National and international environmental groups are fully supported with billions of your tax dollars, which they use to lobby governments in pursuit of their radical agendas and they use for attorney's fees in court cases, with the sole purpose of making law (their law) by court decree, rather than by legislation. On top of government handouts to environmental groups, duped philanthropic organizations pour millions upon millions more dollars into environmental endeavors.

 

And boy has it worked. Environmental groups have been infamously successful and they have become filthy rich and powerful in the process. But their success has come at a great cost for the rest of us in lost freedoms and liberty, but especially the loss of constitutionally protected property rights.

 

This link goes to a YouTube video entitled "Going for the Green", prepared by Henry Lamb of Sovereignty International, a conservative group, on just where the money is going, how much these environmental groups earn in court settlements (which the taxpayers must pay) and how much these groups are worth in assets. If this information doesn't make you furious, you need your batteries recharged.

 

 

While freedom groups struggle to keep the lights on, environmental and social groups are literally "rolling in the doe", all the while being fully supported with your tax dollars, from an all-too-willing and complicit U. S. government and a totally naive, brainwashed and highly emotional public, who are conned by images of polar bears swimming in open waters, instead of walking on the ice pack.

 

The inescapable axiom is that money is power and "them's with the gold, rule". It's a high-stakes poker game and if you can't "pay", you don't get to "play". A freedom group without money is impotent. Oh yes, a freedom group can make a noise, but it will be like yelling into a deep canyon and the only sound it will hear, is its own echo.

 

So here's the reality. If freedom groups want to get in this high-stakes poker game and "play", they had better start getting sympathetic members to dig deep into their wallets and they had better get sympathetic corporate and philanthropic entities to fork over some of their profits or endowment funds, or these groups might as well fold up their tents and all go fishing, because freedom is lost.

 

However, if freedom is to be preserved without having to resort to revolution, there are only three (3) peaceful ways to accomplish it. At the ballot box, incessant lobbying, or using the courts, just as our "enemy" does. The ballot box is relatively painless. It only requires we be of one mind and willing to take the time to vote. But successful lobbying and the prosecution of constitutional principles in the courts, require bank vaults full of money to be effective.

 

Our organization, like so many others, is ready, willing and able to step into the "ring" and confront the perpetrators. We have the skill, the experience, the knowledge and the passion. But without the money, we are just yelling into a deep canyon and all we can hear...is our own pitiful echo.

 

The same is true for the Tea Party Movement, no matter how big they get. They can make all the noise they want, but without the money and gobs of it, along with an effective way to spend it, no one will take them seriously. The truth is, the Freedom Movement is being out spent, out legislated and out "lawyered" and the other side is thumbing their collective noses at them, because they know freedom groups don't have the necessary "table stakes" to get in the game.

 

The solution to the money problem is blatantly obvious. If the 58,000,000 people that voted conservative in the 2008 election, donated just $10.00 per month to a freedom group, ($120 per year) that freedom group would have just shy of $7 Billion at the end of the year. But say instead of just one freedom group, the same amount was spread out to 100 freedom groups. Each group would have $70,000,000 at the end of the year, year in and year out. Can you imagine how many constitutional lawsuits one freedom group could file with $70,000,000? Even at a thousand freedom groups, each group would have $7,000,000 to spend on defending freedom. Hopefully, you get the picture.

 

If we truly want to preserve freedom without bloodshed, then we must be willing to overwhelm the legislators, at all levels, and we must be willing to overwhelm the courts. Until the money starts flowing into the freedom movement's coffers, we are left out in the cold, without any clothes. If you want to put on some clothes and get "warm", you'll have to join an environmental group. That is where the "game" is being played and they are playing it to the hilt.

 

The old adage that, "you get what you pay for", is even more relevant when it comes to defending freedom.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review