|
Lee Ellis
The Unfair Fairness
Doctrine
November 8, 2008
Now that the
Left controls our government, thanks to the Nov 4, 2008 election, there
may well be a stronger effort made to stop the opposition from Talk
Radio, a plan to drive Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Laura
Ingraham, Glenn Beck and other conservatives off the air by reviving the
Fairness Doctrine. Thus, I think that once again we need to look at the
reasoning behind the original doctrine and why it was needed then, but
is unnecessary now.
Do you remember what
our media was like many decades ago? I am sure that many of you are too
young to go back more than two decades, so let me explain, and to remind
some people who might be older, what this broadcast veteran remembers.
Before television, our
radio stations were basically those that belonged to or were affiliated
with the networks, and so most of them carried dramas, called "soap
operas," during the day and celebrity shows all evening. These were the
days of Jack Benny, Fred Allen, Milton Berle, and dramas like
Gangbusters, and Gunsmoke. It was not until 1948, that I was able to buy
my first black and white TV set, with a screen size of only 10 inches.
In those days we did not have cable TV, nor computers, and thus, the
networks slowly switched all their nightly radio programs over to
evening television. However, to receive these programs, we had to
install huge antennas on our rooftops. If we lived in a major
metropolitan city, we might be able to see a maximum of three TV
stations; if we lived on the outskirts or in a suburb, we were lucky to
be able to receive just one TV station.
It was then, according
to the
Museum of Broadcasting, that the FCC took the view, in 1949, that
station licensees were "public trustees," and as such had an obligation
to afford reasonable opportunity for discussion of contrasting points of
view on controversial issues of public importance. The Commission later
held that stations were also obligated to actively seek out issues of
importance to their community and air programming that addressed those
issues. This was understandable back then, because it was feared that
broadcast owners could dominate the public with their own personal
political views.
The Museum of
Broadcasting further reminds us, "The fairness doctrine ran parallel to
Section 315 of the Communications Act of 1937 which required stations to
offer ‘equal opportunity’ to all legally qualified political candidates
for any office if they had allowed any person running in that office to
use the station. The attempt was to balance -- to force an even
handedness. Section 315 exempted news programs, interviews and
documentaries. But the doctrine would include such efforts. Another
major difference should be noted here: Section 315 was federal law,
passed by Congress. The fairness doctrine was simply FCC policy.”
This was not true as
far as newspapers were concerned. I can remember when the average home
would subscribe to as many as four newspapers per day -- -- -- two in
the morning and two in the late afternoon. Back then, they were only 2
cents each on a news rack. As a boy, my parents used to have four Boston
newspapers thrown on our front porch daily. When I came to LA, it had
four newspapers, too --- The LA Times, The LA Mirror, the LA
Herald-Express and the LA Examiner.
As TV grew rapidly and
matured with color, it began to take over the news, causing newspapers
to lose readers and advertisers. As this trend grew, newspapers shrunk
to only one per city.
Radio had almost died,
but then discovered "format radio” that appealed to what was called
niche or specialty groups. It started with "Top Forty” popular record
hits that became highly successful. This was followed by 24 hour news
radio stations as was pioneered by two LA radio companies ---KNX and
KFWB.
Finally, talk radio was
started with people like the late Joe Pyne. His daily taped, syndicated
radio program was heard in 254 markets and Pyne was also the number-one
morning guy in LA in 1966. He was so popular he was allowed to broadcast
the 6-10 a.m. program from his home. He also was the first outraged,
outspoken voice on national television, the father of modern
conservative talk shows; blazing a path for Morton Downey, Jr., Wally
George, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity, and
many others. Radio really grew and began to dominate the marketplace in
the daytime. Today there are 31 AM plus 49 FM --- a total of 80 radio
stations --- in just the city of Los Angeles, all with their own
specialty niche audience groups.
As Cable TV brought in
new channels such as CNN, MSNBC and Fox News, network news began to
slip. CBS, NBC and ABC began to substitute features for much of their
hard news, relegating most political news to headlines or just two
minutes of TV time. Between features and commercials, there was not much
time left in a half-hour news period.
And so, as both TV
stations and radio stations multiplied with even small towns being
supplied not only by many AM and FM radio stations but also by cable
suddenly bringing in hundreds of TV channels broadcasting all types of
viewpoints, this opened the door to stopping the so-called fairness
policy.
In 1985, the FCC issued
its Fairness Report, asserting that the doctrine was no longer having
its intended effect, might actually have a "chilling effect" and might
be in violation of the First Amendment. In a 1987 case, Meredith Corp.
v. FCC, the courts declared that the doctrine was not mandated by
Congress and the FCC did not have to continue to enforce it. The FCC
dissolved the doctrine in August of that year.
Jumping to 2007, what
was feared back in the 40s, when people had only one station to which
they could listen, had begun to happen as both Network news and Cable
news began to all echo the policies of the new Secular Progressives who
were intent on socializing the American government as had happened in
Europe. The only opposition voices came from the new talk radio.
Yes, Fox Cable News, had turned half of its views to
conservatives, but it was the lone TV network doing this. It was up
against the liberal views of CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, and
taxpayer supported, government sponsored NPR! It was also against the
new liberal blogs and Left-Wing web sites such as MoveOn.org on the
rapidly-growing Internet. Computers had become an essential part of
every home. And, of course, all far-left groups still had access to Fox
to counteract any views held by conservatives.
Yet, this was not
enough for the leftists. As of early 2007, Senator Bernie Sanders, along
with Representatives Dennis Kucinich, Maurice Hinchey and Louise
Slaughter had announced their support of legislation which would reverse
the 1987 FCC decision and restore the Fairness Doctrine. They were then
joined by Senators Dianne Feinstein, John Kerry and Dick Durbin. This
was a deliberate attempt to eliminate the remaining voice of the
Conservatives --- Talk Radio!
Now, in 2009, we can
expect this drive to be pushed again by the new Democrat majority and
the Democrat President in an effort to stop the loyal opposition whose
only voice may be limited to talk radio!
Remember that the
Democrats now seem to control and have access to all TV networks, blogs
and internet sites like MoveOn.org. They also seem to have the complete
support of almost all newspapers in the nation, especially large
metropolitan ones such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, The
Chicago Tribune, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The San Francisco
Chronicle and The Los Angeles Times.
We must also remember
the fact that the Fairness Doctrine was originally added by the FCC when
cities were limited to only one TV station owner per locale. Now, the
only private media that seems limited to just one outlet in each city is
the local newspaper. So if we apply the original reason for the need of
The Fairness Doctrine, then perhaps it needs to be applied to the print
media, not to the many radio stations broadcasting in each such area!
In most towns today,
the local newspaper is probably owned by a chain. While local news is
often well done by local reporters, almost all opinion columns and
national news comes from syndicated sources, mostly direct from The New
York Times Syndication Service or from AP (The Associated Press). In my
valley of nine cities, we have access to many radio stations ---both AM
and FM. Time-Warner Cable supplies us with both hundreds of TV channels
and broadband Internet for our computers, but we only have one local
daily newspaper! The only way to get the Conservative viewpoint is to
turn to just two of the local radio broadcast channels where we can
listen to the following all day: Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Sean
Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Glenn Beck.
Based on this desire
of some of our liberal government politicians for fairness, which medium
really needs a Fairness Doctrine applied? It is certainly NOT Talk Radio
---to do that would require the Unfair Fairness Doctrine! |