New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Social Bookmarking
Bookmark and Share
Recent Articles
Paul Krugman, Politician
Celebrating the Fourth with Washington
The McChrystal Affair
Liberals Expose Themselves (And It's a Good Thing)
Epidemic of Foot-in-Mouth
Borders, Polls & Statistics Schmatistics
Blowing Up a Pornographic Boycott
Looking Like Europe
Car Bombs & The English Language
Slouching Toward Columbia & Belgium
Washing Out Dirty Mouths
A Dangerous, Unbeautiful Nanny
The TARP-Profit Lie
Stink Bomb Democrats
Dissing Emilia
War Irreconcilable
Lies, Damned Lies & Statistics
There Is Method in Obama's Healthcare Madness
Perverse Financial Elites
PIGS Flying Under the Radar
Hope Run Amok
Obama: No JFK
Stunningly Shameless
Massachusetts: Vote! For God's Sake, Vote!
Cowardice, Expediency, Language & Liberals
Max, Tax & Principles
Christmas Times Four
A Tax Snake in the Grass
Bad Gifting as Metaphor
Obama’s Narrative & Afghanistan
Prostitution & The Healthcare Bill
The Viruses That Killed at Fort Hood
Prize Winner Perversity
Healthcare: Who Are the Know-Nothings?
Let’s Kill All the Tomatoes!
It's Not a War Against FOX News
Beware CBO Healthcare Estimates
(Let's Hope) We’re Not Gonna Take It Anymore
Hyperpartisanship, Propaganda & Hypocrisy
Afghanistan & Sherman's Legacy
Epistemology, Materialists & Morality
Cleaning Up the House
Worse Than the Stench of the Stable
Obama's Shameful Education Affair
Healthcare Reform: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Real (Audaciously Arrogant) Mob
News Anchor Uncles
Goldman Sachs America
Krugman & The Boiled Frog

American Aristocrats
Long After the Last Cow Has Come Home
Obama Being Obama
Liberals and The Big Hate
The Frog-Worship Scandal
Thomas Jefferson: Don’t Question a Supreme Court Nominee Without Him
I Never Knew That!

AJ DiCintio

Paul Krugman, Politician
July 13, 2010

Paul Krugman has had all the advantages.

For example, he's a Yale man — Thurston Howell III's opinion about Yalies notwithstanding because among its other excellences, Yale offers its students the opportunity to learn that the world’s greatest creative spirits have been properly brutal in their estimate of politicians.

For instance, attentive Elis should know that the playwrights of ancient Greece heaped unspeakable tragedies on the heads and hearts of the most important politicians — though Sophocles et al. did allow that the hubris-infected big shots might return to favor among the gods if they accepted their punishment with humility and understanding.

Yale grads ought to know, too, that Dante and Shakespeare were not so kind, the former depicting politicians as prime candidates to suffer the hellish, eternal pain of the inferno and the latter regarding them as so profoundly incapable of redemption (or today’s "rehabilitation”) that he ended his plays by littering the stage with their bodies.

Yes, Yale men and women should know what great writers have always said about politicians, including the vitriol penned by satirists such as Juvenal, Swift, and Twain.

Perhaps, however, they don’t because for decades on end our colleges and universities have been exempting liberal/leftist politicians from truths written and spoken since antiquity.

(Anita Dunn, Obama’s former interim communications director and campaign "senior advisor,” is no professor. But she did her best to promulgate The Liberal View of Politicians when in June of ’09 she told graduates of St. Andrew’s prep school outside Washington that she considers the madman monster, mass murderer, and obese human rights hater Mao Zedong one of her "favorite political philosophers.”)

But whatever Paul Krugman learned or didn’t learn as a student, the fact remains that he could have chosen the career of honest, sensible economist (to the extent such a feat is possible for practitioners of the "dismal science”).

However, he didn’t, opting, instead, to become a politician economist, with all the ugliness the choice entails.

(How’s that for proving that advantage alone doesn’t even come close to making the man.)

Here’s the evidence:

Anyone who’s been reading Krugman lately knows he’s been relentlessly calling for enormous government borrowing and spending as the only true avenue to economic recovery.

In fact, the Princeton professor wanted the $800 billion slab of rancid, earmarked pork that is the "stimulus bill” to weigh in at over a trillion dollars, perhaps $1.2 trillion.

And today he certainly favors more "stimulus,” even in the form of welfare to states such as California, Illinois, and New York, all of which face astonishing deficits — through no fault of their own, according to liberal dogma.

In fact, Krugman gets so excited about the benefits of a nation’s borrowing its way out of hard times he recently gushed that "the long-term cost of servicing an extra trillion dollars of borrowing is [only] $17.5 billion,” as if the amount is a one-time cost (it’s annual and likely to last forever) and as if there’s no further price to be paid for the "inflation-protected” government bonds he expects China to buy.

Moreover, he has condemned Western European nations as Ultimate Scrooges for not increasing their borrowing and spending even though their citizens are straining to keep their noses above an existing ocean of national debt that reaches just to (and at times into) their nostrils.

However, while Krugman has called for huge, increased spending literally hundreds of times, he has only several times mentioned the need for fiscal responsibility in the future.

Worse, he speaks in exquisite detail about how much the U.S. ought to borrow and how it should spend the money (some of which initiates permanent government programs); yet he never gets specific about his ideas for what happens when the borrowing must end.

Incredible.

Is it possible a Nobel Prize winning economist finds himself unable to "do the math” regarding how much in tax increases or reductions in government programs will be necessary to put the nation’s fiscal house in order?

Is it possible he is completely flummoxed about the kind of taxes needed and how they will fall on the population?

It is possible he has not a single specific thought about the degree to which the new level of taxation will retard economic growth? Or how it may create a "new normal” in baseline unemployment? Or how it might keep young people living at home with their parents until they are 30 or 35?

Is it possible he cannot calculate the point at which a nation’s debt leads to disaster, a point at which even he declares "not a cent more”?

Is it possible he can’t determine how many dollars China must accumulate before it can purchase the 30 companies that comprise the Dow Jones Industrial Average, even as that nation holds sway over American workers and American culture as a result of the U.S. debt it holds?

Of course the answer to those questions is "no.”

Yet not a specific word from him about the size and consequences of the bill that the economic piper always lays on the table after the profligate have gorged themselves on debt.

That’s why Paul Krugman is a politician.

And not any politician but one who is not an iota different from his "enormously intellectual” kindred spirit who ran on promises of "hope” and "change” only to approve trillions for "stimulus” spending, healthcare "reform,” bailouts for Fannie, Freddie, and auto workers, and the hiring of at least 100,000 new federal bureaucrats to administer hundreds of new federal bureaucracies, on top of a current $1.5 trillion annual federal deficit — all without uttering a single specific word about the fiscal and social burden that his manic borrowing and spending will inevitably lay on the backs of the American people.

That’s why Paul Krugman and his deceitful, insidious alter ego fully deserve the bitter condemnations that, for millennia, humanity’s great truth-tellers have levied upon practitioners of possibly earth’s oldest but surely its filthiest profession.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review