New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Social Bookmarking

Recent Articles
Bad Gifting as Metaphor
Obama’s Narrative & Afghanistan
Prostitution & The Healthcare Bill
The Viruses That Killed at Fort Hood
Prize Winner Perversity
Healthcare: Who Are the Know-Nothings?
Let’s Kill All the Tomatoes!
It's Not a War Against FOX News
Beware CBO Healthcare Estimates
(Let's Hope) We’re Not Gonna Take It Anymore
Hyperpartisanship, Propaganda & Hypocrisy
Afghanistan & Sherman's Legacy
Epistemology, Materialists & Morality
Cleaning Up the House
Worse Than the Stench of the Stable
Obama's Shameful Education Affair
Healthcare Reform: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Real (Audaciously Arrogant) Mob
News Anchor Uncles
Goldman Sachs America
Krugman & The Boiled Frog

American Aristocrats
Long After the Last Cow Has Come Home
Obama Being Obama
Liberals and The Big Hate
The Frog-Worship Scandal
Thomas Jefferson: Don’t Question a Supreme Court Nominee Without Him
I Never Knew That!
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine II
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine
Colin Powell Comes Up Small
Headlines, Torture & American Values
Something Very Deep and Dark
Miss California’s Unforgivable Mistake
The President in the Garden
Liberals & The Triumph of Reason
Messiah, Lincoln or Less?
Obama, Big Bangs & Selling Make Believe
Hostile Alien Case Exposes Danger of Activist...
The Age of Arrogance
Lenin Lite, Perhaps?
Where’s the Guilt?
In the Matter of Public v. Stimulus Bill
Bigger Than the Bacon Explosion
Where Bill O’Reilly’s Going Wrong
Dear Camille
Liberals, Israel & Wolves
Sarkozy, Israel & The Neurotic Mind
The Problem with Hope
The Winter Solstice & the Triumph of Reason
Bush & Obama: Slouching Us Toward Disaster...
Beware the Recovery Plan
New Deal Not Such a Big Deal?
Republicans & The Courts
That Flatulent Thing Called Experience
Can Obama Call Spirits from the Vasty Deep?
A Million Calls, Ten Million Voters
Liberals Boiling, Conservatives Not, But...
The Merely Human Messiah and the Sea
Fully Understanding the Bill Ayres "Distraction”
How McCain Can Deliver a Last Round KO
Obama & The English Language
Are Americans Really Open to Obama’s New Ideas?
Love Behind the Most Rotten Golden Parachute of All
McCain & Reagan’s Broad Shoulders
When Conservatives Behave like Liberals
Maddening Times at the Gray Lady

AJ DiCintio

Bad Gifting as Metaphor
December 11, 2009

In harmony with Christmas and Hanukkah and an assurance that only leftists will accuse me of giving a bad gift, I’m offering this piece-of-advice present...Read Virginia Postrel’s "” as often as you can.


"Thanks,” you say but quickly add that before you risk your valuable time surfing to and around Virginia’s site, you’ll need a testimonial.


Excellent, because I’ve been thinking to include one all along, specifically, one centered on "Gifts and the Knowledge Problem,” a recent blog post in which Ms. Postrel regales us with her acute perception as she discusses bad gifts and the idea of centralized government, beginning with Brad Pitt’s not-so-good present to the people of New Orleans’ Ninth Ward.


How could the actor be guilty of bad gifting? According to Postrel, because he gave "what pleases him rather than what the recipient wants.” (In this case, the recipient wants "comfortable, inexpensive, and quickly available houses,” not "cutting-edge architecture.”)


Providing us with more examples of gifts that "disappoint,” Postrel quotes from an article (Allure, December) by Cheryl Strayed, a woman who somehow got on the wrong side of the inscrutably fickle and sometimes downright nasty Goddess of Gifts:


My boyfriend gave me a 12-pack of Diet Coke for Christmas!


There were the used bath towels sent as a wedding present by an otherwise sane relative.


And then there was the granddaddy of them all: a Weight Watchers gift certificate from my mother-in-law for my birthday when I was eight months pregnant.


Of course, we are much more than annoyed when we receive such gifts, a truth Postrel thoughtfully captures in her analysis of mother-in-law’s present:


But whatever the good intentions, the gift itself revealed that she knew little of her daughter-in-law’s own desires or how Strayed wished to be thought of by others. [The gift] wasn’t just wasteful . . . It actually hurt.


Yes, a bad gift causes much more than the financial harm Joel Waldfogel discusses in Scroogenomics: Why You Shouldn’t Buy Presents for the Holidays.


But however interesting the notion of bad gifting, Postrel (as usual) has bigger ideas to fry, as indicated by her perceiving a hugely important metaphor in the fact that gifts often disappoint or worse. And so it is that she coins an adjective from the name of a prominent 20th century economist to make the point:


The problem of buying good presents for other people, even people you supposedly know well, illustrates that old familiar Hayekian concept, the knowledge problem. If you can’t even give your loved ones the right presents, how likely is it that a central authority could make the right decisions for everyone?


(A staunch defender of the free market system, Friedrich von Hayek argued that socialism inevitably leads to totalitarianism.)


Why is this observation crucially important?


For one thing, it motivates us never to lose sight of the truth that the fundamental belief of American liberals, including the rabidly anti-Hayekian Barack Obama, is that the knowledge problem doesn’t exist with respect to centralized government (as long, liberals tell us, as they are in charge).


Moreover, it causes us to keep the following realities firmly in our minds:


Liberals love to use the meaningless euphemism "empathy” when they characterize the jurisprudential attitude of liberal activist Supreme Court justices. But that doesn’t change the truth that "activist” judges are insidious dictators who one day announce they are bound by the Constitution’s language, the next day base a ruling upon the undefined, capriciously invoked phrase, "evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society,” and the day after that put on their sorcerer’s robes as they explain they had no choice but to agree with the demands whispered by "penumbras” that were formed by "emanations” radiated by the Constitution’s words (see Roe v. Wade).


Liberals blatantly ignore the landslide will of the people which demands that Congress honestly and innovatively fix the healthcare system. Then, they stomp ahead with their true purpose, contained in a 2,000 page, trillion dollar (for starters,) tax-exploding, care-imploding monstrosity that fundamentally changes the existing system by dumping 16% of the nation’s GDP into the power and wealth gorging maw of the distant, unapproachable, heedless leviathan they love to call "Your Federal Government.”


Liberals turn a deaf ear and mind to those who denounce "Cap and Trade” as an environmental and economic fraud that "merely allows polluters and Wall Street traders to fleece the public out of billions of dollars” (see James Hansen, NYT). Why? Because their real interest lies in adding tons of blubber to the insatiably hungry leviathan as well as perpetuating the Money/Political Influence Cycle that endlessly circles from the fetid swamp of Washington to the foul morass of Wall Street, home to the lair of the remorseless, shamelessly predatory hydra whose grossest, ugliest head is called "Goldman Sachs.”


Those are but three of many examples that demonstrate how deep, hot, and dangerous is the liberal lust for a "central authority” that believes it possesses the knowledge to make "the right decisions for everyone.”


But they are sufficient to convince even the most demanding among us of the brilliance of Virginia Postrel, who warns that the object of liberal lust isn’t "just wasteful” but will "actually hurt.”


To which I humbly add this:


We Americans will suffer plenty of hurt if liberals succeed in causing the nation to lose its economic, social, and political vitality so that it "looks like” the stooping, dispirited, stagnant, sheepish societies of Western Europe.


However, as profound as that hurt will be, it will be doubly intensified by the excruciating moral pain that comes with the realization that we have only ourselves to blame for having allowed those who can’t stand democracy when it stands in their way to metamorphose the magnificent roar of the gift bequeathed to us more than 200 years ago into an emaciated, mousey squeak.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal,, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media © 2011
A Division of

Dreamhost Review