New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Recent Articles
The Viruses That Killed at Fort Hood
Prize Winner Perversity
Healthcare: Who Are the Know-Nothings?
Let’s Kill All the Tomatoes!
It's Not a War Against FOX News
Beware CBO Healthcare Estimates
(Let's Hope) We’re Not Gonna Take It Anymore
Hyperpartisanship, Propaganda & Hypocrisy
Afghanistan & Sherman's Legacy
Epistemology, Materialists & Morality
Cleaning Up the House
Worse Than the Stench of the Stable
Obama's Shameful Education Affair
Healthcare Reform: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Real (Audaciously Arrogant) Mob
News Anchor Uncles
Goldman Sachs America
Krugman & The Boiled Frog

American Aristocrats
Long After the Last Cow Has Come Home
Obama Being Obama
Liberals and The Big Hate
The Frog-Worship Scandal
Thomas Jefferson: Don’t Question a Supreme Court Nominee Without Him
I Never Knew That!
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine II
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine
Colin Powell Comes Up Small
Headlines, Torture & American Values
Something Very Deep and Dark
Miss California’s Unforgivable Mistake
The President in the Garden
Liberals & The Triumph of Reason
Messiah, Lincoln or Less?
Obama, Big Bangs & Selling Make Believe
Hostile Alien Case Exposes Danger of Activist...
The Age of Arrogance
Lenin Lite, Perhaps?
Where’s the Guilt?
In the Matter of Public v. Stimulus Bill
Bigger Than the Bacon Explosion
Where Bill O’Reilly’s Going Wrong
Dear Camille
Liberals, Israel & Wolves
Sarkozy, Israel & The Neurotic Mind
The Problem with Hope
The Winter Solstice & the Triumph of Reason
Bush & Obama: Slouching Us Toward Disaster...
Beware the Recovery Plan
New Deal Not Such a Big Deal?
Republicans & The Courts
That Flatulent Thing Called Experience
Can Obama Call Spirits from the Vasty Deep?
A Million Calls, Ten Million Voters
Liberals Boiling, Conservatives Not, But...
The Merely Human Messiah and the Sea
Fully Understanding the Bill Ayres "Distraction”
How McCain Can Deliver a Last Round KO
Obama & The English Language
Are Americans Really Open to Obama’s New Ideas?
Love Behind the Most Rotten Golden Parachute of All
McCain & Reagan’s Broad Shoulders
When Conservatives Behave like Liberals
Maddening Times at the Gray Lady
Social Bookmarking

AJ DiCintio

The Viruses That Killed at Fort Hood
November 19, 2009

Two viruses caused the murders, wounds, and suffering at Fort Hood.


The first arises from the fact that although a capacity for evil is inherent in human nature, human beings have, as David Brooks recently observed, a "conscious say” regarding the commission of evil acts.


Therefore, the actual cause of the Fort Hood attack is the conscious choice by terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan to commit an act of horrific evil.


There is, however, a second virus that is a proximate cause of the murders, one that — irony of ironies that cry out to Heaven for redress — allowed a madman who openly gave signs of being a radical Islamist to remain an officer and a psychiatrist in the U.S. Army.


That virus is Political Correctness, to which shameless liberals assign zero percent of the blame for the murders, as evidenced by the following contemptible behaviors:


...Liberal ideologues, including President Obama, have labored mightily to keep the PC issue out of the national discourse by maintaining a perfectly stupid silence about the subject.


...Liberal commentators, such as Chris "That’s not a crime to call up al Qaeda, is it?” Matthews, have invoked perfectly stupid legalisms to distract the public from it.


...To cover it up, liberal members of the Political/Military/Intellectual Class have spewed perfectly stupid, rankly insulting non sequiturs that accomplish nothing good — except to put their mindless devotion to PC on full display.


"What happened at Fort Hood was a tragedy [emphasis added], but I believe it would be an even greater tragedy if our diversity becomes a casualty here.”


No need to wonder if General George Casey’s stream of consciousness would run along the same course if it were "Pearl Harbor” or "9/11” instead of "Fort Hood” because it would. After all, being possessed of a gnawing neurotic guilt that permits one to blame the victim while conferring victimhood upon the criminal is a sine qua non of what it means to be a liberal.


In contrast to the dangerous anti-intellectualism of liberals, other Americans, including conservatives who comprise the American "mob,” have been clear about the role PC played in the terrorist attack.   


In his commentary on the attack (, Mark Steyn comments on the shallowness of liberal dogma regarding "diversity” and "multiculturalism,” two pillars that support the PC agenda, before drawing this conclusion about the reality of the PC/Fort Hood connection:


What happened is not a "tragedy” but a national scandal, already fading from view.


David Brooks (NY Times) argues that liberals threw "a shroud of political correctness...over the [Fort Hood] conversation,” thereby corrupting and demeaning it by "[reducing] a heinous act to social maladjustment.”


Former FBI profiler Clint Van Zandt makes this observation ( about what enabled the terrorist to carry out his traitorously evil plan:


Political correctness has been called the handmaiden of terrorism, and in the case of Maj. Hassan[sic], she served him well.


The voting public also has its eyes, ears, and mind wide open, as revealed by the following data (Rasmussen, November 11, 2009).


76% believe the army should remove from duty all officers like Hasan who attempt to contact radical terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda.


While those intellectually honest reactions by commentators and landslide majorities of voters represent good news, the bad news is that a full national discussion about the moral and intellectual abomination called Political Correctness has not yet occurred — including a dialogue about how this cancer on our culture has metastasized to the extent that its malignancy exists even at the highest levels of our military.


With regard to the matter of discussing the "how,” Thomas D. Segel has provided the nation with an excellent starting point (


It started out as a mild virus initiated by the left of center intellectuals of academia. But, like every spread rapidly through schools, hospitals, civil service, the media, companies, governance and the armed forces. Political correctness has poisoned all of America.


Yes, a most excellent starting point — because only a few moments of serious thought are needed to confirm the aptness of Segal’s characterization of PC as a twist of DNA that begins its life innocuously but soon transforms into a virulent agent whose first kills are intellectuality and free speech.


Did we not, for example, believe that ridiculously meaningless nouns such as undocumented alien and undocumented worker would never ascend into widespread use?


Were we not absolutely certain that the viciously false adjective anti-immigrant would never become a widely used replacement for anti-illegal immigration and anti-open borders.


And did we not dismiss man-caused disaster (for terrorist attack) and overseas contingency operation (for war on terror) as mere hope-babble that would never carry weight with those who actually make decisions about defending our nation from enemies at home and abroad?


(How like glistening, brave lions did President Barack Obama and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano behave when they introduced the "nuance” of man-caused disaster into the American lexicon of public policy. And how predictably did those kings of the merely political jungle morph into dirty, cowardly mice when they meticulously avoided using that term with respect to the attack at Fort Hood.)


George Orwell, who fought the good fight against every perversion of language, would never have regarded PC as anything except an insidiously dangerous, death-dealing virus; for he knew that "if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.”


To his insightful observation, we can add this: Corrupt thought will eventually corrupt and destroy an entire culture.


That is the most important lesson the nation should learn from the virus that is a proximate cause of the terrorist attack at Fort Hood.


What remains after the lesson is whether we will dedicate ourselves to joining the battle against Political Correctness no matter how many times or where — from kindergarten to the workplace to the college classroom to the meeting room of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — we are called to the front.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal,, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media © 2011
A Division of

Dreamhost Review