Front Page           
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
American Fifth Column
Culture Wars             
Headlines                 
Analysis               
NMJ Radio          
NMJ TV               
Analysis Archive
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google


See blogs and businesses for USA
About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Recent Articles
Let’s Kill All the Tomatoes!
It's Not a War Against FOX News
Beware CBO Healthcare Estimates
(Let's Hope) We’re Not Gonna Take It Anymore
Hyperpartisanship, Propaganda & Hypocrisy
Afghanistan & Sherman's Legacy
Epistemology, Materialists & Morality
Cleaning Up the House
Worse Than the Stench of the Stable
Obama's Shameful Education Affair
Healthcare Reform: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Real (Audaciously Arrogant) Mob
News Anchor Uncles
Goldman Sachs America
Krugman & The Boiled Frog

American Aristocrats
Long After the Last Cow Has Come Home
Obama Being Obama
Liberals and The Big Hate
The Frog-Worship Scandal
Thomas Jefferson: Don’t Question a Supreme Court Nominee Without Him
I Never Knew That!
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine II
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine
Colin Powell Comes Up Small
Headlines, Torture & American Values
Something Very Deep and Dark
Miss California’s Unforgivable Mistake
The President in the Garden
Liberals & The Triumph of Reason
Fear
Messiah, Lincoln or Less?
Obama, Big Bangs & Selling Make Believe
Hostile Alien Case Exposes Danger of Activist...
The Age of Arrogance
Lenin Lite, Perhaps?
Where’s the Guilt?
In the Matter of Public v. Stimulus Bill
Bigger Than the Bacon Explosion
Where Bill O’Reilly’s Going Wrong
Dear Camille
Liberals, Israel & Wolves
Sarkozy, Israel & The Neurotic Mind
The Problem with Hope
The Winter Solstice & the Triumph of Reason
Bush & Obama: Slouching Us Toward Disaster...
Beware the Recovery Plan
New Deal Not Such a Big Deal?
Republicans & The Courts
That Flatulent Thing Called Experience
Can Obama Call Spirits from the Vasty Deep?
A Million Calls, Ten Million Voters
Liberals Boiling, Conservatives Not, But...
The Merely Human Messiah and the Sea
Fully Understanding the Bill Ayres “Distraction”
How McCain Can Deliver a Last Round KO
Obama & The English Language
Are Americans Really Open to Obama’s New Ideas?
Love Behind the Most Rotten Golden Parachute of All
McCain & Reagan’s Broad Shoulders
When Conservatives Behave like Liberals
Maddening Times at the Gray Lady

AJ DiCintio

Let’s Kill All the Tomatoes!
October 30, 2009

If we can correctly guess anything about the nature of the leftist mind, it’s that its neurons, in varying degrees, are rife with chemicals that give rise to the love of power, the love of being ruled, the love of hypocrisy, and the love of neurotic guilt — a quadruplet that explains perverse behaviors that leftists always characterize as resulting from a triumph of reason.

For example, when American liberals hear Shakespeare’s character say that to create a utopian society, “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers,” they don’t cheer a person who reveals an admirable thoughtfulness regarding what “Utopia” means.

Rather, liberals claim reason impels them to hiss, “Dick the Butcher is a racist, fascist troglodyte — like every member of today’s tort reform loving mob!”

To be honest about it, leftist perversity always gets the “let’s kill” thing wrong.

Such is the case regarding the bureaucrats of the Swedish National Food Administration, who, in their zeal to reduce Sweden’s “carbon footprint,” are trying to convince Swedes to do a lot of perfectly stupid killing.

What is this all about? Well, to understand it, one first needs to know that according to Elisabeth Rosenthal (NY Times), all Swedes may soon be confronted with new labels that list “the carbon dioxide emissions associated with the production of foods, from whole wheat pasta to fast food burgers.”

To give us an idea of what the labels look like, Rosenthal explains that a set of guinea pig Swedish shoppers are already being “flummoxed” by the following pronouncement on a box of oatmeal (which this author has restated in the English system).

“Climate declared: 14 ounces CO2 per pound of product.”

Now, Swedes may be bewildered by the message, but Americans immediately perceive both its meaning and intent:

The information informs shoppers that nearly a pound of carbon dioxide was released into the atmosphere to produce a pound of the oatmeal.

Its purpose is to encourage Swedes to do their darnedest to kill one food and purchase another that is more carbon friendly —price be damned.

As sensible people will guess, the real plan is eventually to ditch the program’s Obama-sized portion of hope and replace it with governmental force that kills food choices.

But as things now stand, the Food Administration is simply counting on obedient subjects of the Swedish nanny state to love the most environmentally correct foods.

Yes, love them — even if, for example, the stuff has the taste and texture of stable bedding and is infinitely less nutritious than the steelcut havremjöl, which, topped with environmentally sinful sugar and banana and eaten for frukost on many a frozen morning, has, since childhood, warmed the little that remains of the Swedish heart and soul.

Swedes will also have to make other wrenching decisions as they turn from their shopping lists to read from “proposed new dietary guidelines” that take the environment into account.

Yes, every Swedish man and kvinna will be faced with deciding whether to stick with old favorites or obey bureaucrats who recommend eating carrots instead of greenhouse-grown tomatoes or beans in place of red meat.

“Never happen in the United States,” somebody might say, “because Carol M. Browner, Obama’s Energy Coordinator/Global Warming Czar, doesn’t have the stomach to attempt laying a culinary guilt trip on Americans.”

Too bad Mr./Ms. Somebody is fixated on the stomach because Czar Browner certainly has the mind for the job as revealed by Stephen Dinan (Washington Times) when he informed us that as soon as Barack Obama chose her for the post, her name disappeared from websites of a number of organizations.

Foremost among those groups is the Commission for a Sustainable World Society, a subsidiary of Socialist International that, according to Dinan, promotes the idea of “global governance” aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions — the economy be damned.

Yes, like every other good liberal, Ms. Browner would love to kill tomatoes and steak in favor of springing into life dinners of carrots and beans, all in the name of energy independence and a clean environment.

We know this to be true because during the Election of ’08, T. Boone Pickens labored as hard as he could on behalf of a plan that eschews killing tomatoes to build a bridge to America’s independent, environmentally sound energy future by erecting electricity producing windmills from North Dakota to Texas and drilling vigorously for natural gas on American soil.

During the campaign, Pickens was optimistic that liberals understood and would act upon his practicable proposal.

But soon after Obama assumed office, T. Boone learned that he who lives upon hope in liberalism will die worse than by fasting as liberals conveniently shoved him and his plan into the vortex of the common sense sucking, We the People devouring black hole that is politics in Washington, DC.

No, liberals won’t support practical, private sector plans that move toward achieving an energy independent, environmentally healthful America.

Neither will members of the “wealthiest Democratic group” (Pew Research) reach into their own deep pockets to cover millions of liberal rooftops with photovoltaic systems, a technology currently too costly for most Americans.

But in their insatiable pursuit of power, liberals will connive mightily to institute abominations such as “Cap and Trade,” a contrivance so mad Rube Goldberg couldn’t even imagine it but one nevertheless beloved by partners at Goldman Sachs as well as accountants at the DNC and IRS.

They will continue to jet fuel all the way to Ulan Bator for a vacation or to Tierra del Fuego to attend a conference on “Reducing CO2 Emissions.”

And having learned that Swedes are feeling guilty when they order their favorite burger, they will surely try to create a National Food Administration that issues “environmentally sensible” National Dietary Guidelines.

After all, according to the bible of the Liberal Church, wallowing in neurotic guilt or inducing it in others is one of the four main loves that make life worth living.

Social Bookmarking
               

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The New Media Journal.us © 2010
A Division of BasicsProject.org