About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on
the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up.
Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and
polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Last weekend, the White House fired
some of its biggest guns at FOX News. But tempted as we are, we cannot allow
ourselves to speak of a war because the attack represents just one battle in
a conflict whose scope is profoundly greater than the current
administration’s attempt to crush a cable news channel it regards as an
enemy.
Moreover, the actual war, which has as its object the imposing of
liberal ideology upon the nation by using every social/political weapon
except the ballot box, was begun in earnest more than fifty years ago by
a group that represents 18% of the population but has nevertheless won
victory after victory by the relentlessly employing a strategy that only
minds possessed of a Gulliverian arrogance can love.
Think of it.
In the fifties, a corps of legal commandos began carrying out an
insidious mission to achieve what FDR’s open blitz of 1937 could not,
thereby beginning what would become the successful establishment of
liberal judicial activism as a legitimate, constitutional practice of
jurisprudence not just at the Supreme Court but in the public
consciousness.
In the Presidential Campaign of 1964, liberal tacticians launched a
missile called “Daisy Ad” to fire the first shot in a nationwide
propaganda campaign that to this day — from kindergarten to higher
education to the workplace to the nursing home — equates the word
“conservative” with the idea of extremism.
Throughout the first half of the 20th century, devout liberal generals
dogmatically quoted gobbledygook from the Bible of the Liberal Church
when they were asked why mass murdering leftists such as Stalin and Mao,
intellectual buffoons such as Marx, and pipsqueak gangsters such as Ché
and Castro deserve praise that ought never be afforded a Hitler,
Coughlin, or Pinochet.
Then, in ’68, those five-star leaders declared that their bible enjoins
every liberal to extend the special treatment to all leftist ideologues,
even uncommonly vulgar, suburban-born, bourgeois-bred punks.
In true goose step fashion, their perfectly obedient army of liberal
salvationists immediately began defending the thugs as victims of
“Gestapo tactics” carried out by “pigs” — until the generals decreed it
is more effective to perform the filthy work underground and thus
delegated it to the ACLU and liberal judges.
Finally, with ever increasing frequency since ’68, liberal politicians,
media figures, professors, artistes, and Joe Blows have labored mightily
not just to defeat but to annihilate perceived political enemies by
viciously carpet bombing them with the latest bombe du jour — the
most common among this fetid ordnance being racist, fascist,
extremist, anti-intellectual, anti-immigrant,
anti-Constitution, mob, evil-monger, and, supreme
irony of ironies, anti-choice and un-American.
Those are the tactics employed in the war liberals have been waging
since the fifties, a war that is actually unexceptional because it fits
in quite commonly with every other anti-Jeffersonian crusade that ever
spoke of the sanctity of “We the People” while simultaneously treating
citizens as a bunch of ignorant slobs who need to be protected from
themselves by “empathic” judges, politicians, and bureaucrats who
scribble their dirty decrees from the level of government a million
miles removed from Peoria.
Of course, all this doesn’t mean we ought to ignore the on-going assault
on FOX News. In fact, we should pay close attention to the fight — but
not for the reason advanced by most political commentators (Bernard
Goldberg is an excellent exception), which is simply that the battle is
counter-productive for Obama, his administration, and his political
allies.
No, we need to heed what’s going on and speak out about it forcefully
because from the moment the refusal of Democratic presidential hopefuls
to debate in a forum sponsored by FOX News was not greeted with threats
of a boycott by every other organization sponsoring a Democratic primary
debate, liberals successfully opened a new front in their fifty year
war.
And not just that, for in making maniacally ridiculous declarations such
as the one in which White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel criticized
FOX News as “not a news organization so much as [an outlet that] has a
perspective” while conveniently remaining silent about the pervasive
“perspective” of media such as MSNBC and the NY Times, the Obama War
Room has put its Alinskyite weapons on parade for all to see.
From Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals:
RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and
become a positive.”
RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize
it...isolate the target from sympathy...direct, personalized criticism
and ridicule works.”
Not that this new battlefront has surprised those who know a thing or
two about the Chicago Machine and its radical friends.
For instance, Frank Salvato shared this observation with the nation
exactly four days before the Election of ’08. (For the record, he is
this author’s editor at NewMediaJournal.us.)
From precinct captains, aldermen and community organizers to special
interest activists, racially biased religious leaders and former Weather
Underground terrorists, Illinois, because of the unyielding aggression
of the Progressive-Left, has been transformed from a land where
individual rights were guarded and constitutional liberty was valued at
all costs — the Land of Lincoln — to the home of religious zealots like
Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Fr. Michael Pfleger and the Nation of Islam’s
Louis Farrakhan and political opportunists like Jesse Jackson, Dick
Durbin, Rod Blagojevich and Barack Obama.
“Unyielding aggression of the Progressive-Left” —
Let’s hope Obama’s assault on FOX News causes every common sense citizen
to think about the full meaning of that warning.