Front Page           
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
American Fifth Column
Culture Wars             
Headlines                 
Analysis               
NMJ Radio          
NMJ TV               
Analysis Archive
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google


See blogs and businesses for USA
About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Recent Articles
It's Not a War Against FOX News
Beware CBO Healthcare Estimates
(Let's Hope) We’re Not Gonna Take It Anymore
Hyperpartisanship, Propaganda & Hypocrisy
Afghanistan & Sherman's Legacy
Epistemology, Materialists & Morality
Cleaning Up the House
Worse Than the Stench of the Stable
Obama's Shameful Education Affair
Healthcare Reform: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Real (Audaciously Arrogant) Mob
News Anchor Uncles
Goldman Sachs America
Krugman & The Boiled Frog

American Aristocrats
Long After the Last Cow Has Come Home
Obama Being Obama
Liberals and The Big Hate
The Frog-Worship Scandal
Thomas Jefferson: Don’t Question a Supreme Court Nominee Without Him
I Never Knew That!
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine II
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine
Colin Powell Comes Up Small
Headlines, Torture & American Values
Something Very Deep and Dark
Miss California’s Unforgivable Mistake
The President in the Garden
Liberals & The Triumph of Reason
Fear
Messiah, Lincoln or Less?
Obama, Big Bangs & Selling Make Believe
Hostile Alien Case Exposes Danger of Activist...
The Age of Arrogance
Lenin Lite, Perhaps?
Where’s the Guilt?
In the Matter of Public v. Stimulus Bill
Bigger Than the Bacon Explosion
Where Bill O’Reilly’s Going Wrong
Dear Camille
Liberals, Israel & Wolves
Sarkozy, Israel & The Neurotic Mind
The Problem with Hope
The Winter Solstice & the Triumph of Reason
Bush & Obama: Slouching Us Toward Disaster...
Beware the Recovery Plan
New Deal Not Such a Big Deal?
Republicans & The Courts
That Flatulent Thing Called Experience
Can Obama Call Spirits from the Vasty Deep?
A Million Calls, Ten Million Voters
Liberals Boiling, Conservatives Not, But...
The Merely Human Messiah and the Sea
Fully Understanding the Bill Ayres “Distraction”
How McCain Can Deliver a Last Round KO
Obama & The English Language
Are Americans Really Open to Obama’s New Ideas?
Love Behind the Most Rotten Golden Parachute of All
McCain & Reagan’s Broad Shoulders
When Conservatives Behave like Liberals
Maddening Times at the Gray Lady

AJ DiCintio

It's Not a War Against FOX News
October 22, 2009

Last weekend, the White House fired some of its biggest guns at FOX News. But tempted as we are, we cannot allow ourselves to speak of a war because the attack represents just one battle in a conflict whose scope is profoundly greater than the current administration’s attempt to crush a cable news channel it regards as an enemy.

 

Moreover, the actual war, which has as its object the imposing of liberal ideology upon the nation by using every social/political weapon except the ballot box, was begun in earnest more than fifty years ago by a group that represents 18% of the population but has nevertheless won victory after victory by the relentlessly employing a strategy that only minds possessed of a Gulliverian arrogance can love.

 

Think of it.

 

In the fifties, a corps of legal commandos began carrying out an insidious mission to achieve what FDR’s open blitz of 1937 could not, thereby beginning what would become the successful establishment of liberal judicial activism as a legitimate, constitutional practice of jurisprudence not just at the Supreme Court but in the public consciousness.

 

In the Presidential Campaign of 1964, liberal tacticians launched a missile called “Daisy Ad” to fire the first shot in a nationwide propaganda campaign that to this day — from kindergarten to higher education to the workplace to the nursing home — equates the word “conservative” with the idea of extremism.

 

Throughout the first half of the 20th century, devout liberal generals dogmatically quoted gobbledygook from the Bible of the Liberal Church when they were asked why mass murdering leftists such as Stalin and Mao, intellectual buffoons such as Marx, and pipsqueak gangsters such as Ché and Castro deserve praise that ought never be afforded a Hitler, Coughlin, or Pinochet.

 

Then, in ’68, those five-star leaders declared that their bible enjoins every liberal to extend the special treatment to all leftist ideologues, even uncommonly vulgar, suburban-born, bourgeois-bred punks.

 

In true goose step fashion, their perfectly obedient army of liberal salvationists immediately began defending the thugs as victims of “Gestapo tactics” carried out by “pigs” — until the generals decreed it is more effective to perform the filthy work underground and thus delegated it to the ACLU and liberal judges.

 

Finally, with ever increasing frequency since ’68, liberal politicians, media figures, professors, artistes, and Joe Blows have labored mightily not just to defeat but to annihilate perceived political enemies by viciously carpet bombing them with the latest bombe du jour — the most common among this fetid ordnance being racist, fascist, extremist, anti-intellectual, anti-immigrant, anti-Constitution, mob, evil-monger, and, supreme irony of ironies, anti-choice and un-American.

 

Those are the tactics employed in the war liberals have been waging since the fifties, a war that is actually unexceptional because it fits in quite commonly with every other anti-Jeffersonian crusade that ever spoke of the sanctity of “We the People” while simultaneously treating citizens as a bunch of ignorant slobs who need to be protected from themselves by “empathic” judges, politicians, and bureaucrats who scribble their dirty decrees from the level of government a million miles removed from Peoria.

 

Of course, all this doesn’t mean we ought to ignore the on-going assault on FOX News. In fact, we should pay close attention to the fight — but not for the reason advanced by most political commentators (Bernard Goldberg is an excellent exception), which is simply that the battle is counter-productive for Obama, his administration, and his political allies.

 

No, we need to heed what’s going on and speak out about it forcefully because from the moment the refusal of Democratic presidential hopefuls to debate in a forum sponsored by FOX News was not greeted with threats of a boycott by every other organization sponsoring a Democratic primary debate, liberals successfully opened a new front in their fifty year war.

 

And not just that, for in making maniacally ridiculous declarations such as the one in which White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel criticized FOX News as “not a news organization so much as [an outlet that] has a perspective” while conveniently remaining silent about the pervasive “perspective” of media such as MSNBC and the NY Times, the Obama War Room has put its Alinskyite weapons on parade for all to see.

 

From Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals:

 

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”

 

RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it...isolate the target from sympathy...direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.”

 

Not that this new battlefront has surprised those who know a thing or two about the Chicago Machine and its radical friends.

 

For instance, Frank Salvato shared this observation with the nation exactly four days before the Election of ’08. (For the record, he is this author’s editor at NewMediaJournal.us.)

 

From precinct captains, aldermen and community organizers to special interest activists, racially biased religious leaders and former Weather Underground terrorists, Illinois, because of the unyielding aggression of the Progressive-Left, has been transformed from a land where individual rights were guarded and constitutional liberty was valued at all costs — the Land of Lincoln — to the home of religious zealots like Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Fr. Michael Pfleger and the Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan and political opportunists like Jesse Jackson, Dick Durbin, Rod Blagojevich and Barack Obama.

 

“Unyielding aggression of the Progressive-Left” —

 

Let’s hope Obama’s assault on FOX News causes every common sense citizen to think about the full meaning of that warning.

Social Bookmarking
               

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The New Media Journal.us © 2010
A Division of BasicsProject.org